PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
Selective Replay Under Incomplete Dependency Information: An exploratory benchmark of correctness and audit cost
- 1Magnexis
Abstract
A reproducible exploratory computer-science preprint on selective workflow replay under incomplete dependency information. The accompanying source archive contains two executed dependency-free Python experiments: a 480-scenario in-memory DAG study and a 96-scenario controlled file-processing study using generated temporary files. The evidence rejects the assumption that sparse random auditing alone makes incomplete dependency tracking safe; it does not prove general workflow correctness or deployed-system performance. Version 1.0 is not peer reviewed.
Related
- The Distribution of Lexical Information Within Dependency Spans: Cross-Linguistic Evidence from 22 Languages
- Scheduling with Bounded Information: Correctness, Progress, and Near-Optimal Performance in DTA
- Learning and Steering in Incomplete-Information Games
- Dependency, Compression, and Synergy: A Unified Information-Theoretic View of Multimodal Learning
- Partial-field inferability of galaxy overdensity structure: An information-geometric account of incomplete sky coverage
BibTeX
@misc{looney2026selective,
title = {{Selective Replay Under Incomplete Dependency Information: An exploratory benchmark of correctness and audit cost}},
author = {Matthew Looney},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23545812},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23545812},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Selective Replay Under Incomplete Dependency Information: An exploratory benchmark of correctness and audit cost
AU - Matthew Looney
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23545812
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23545812
AB - A reproducible exploratory computer-science preprint on selective workflow replay under incomplete dependency information. The accompanying source archive contains two executed dependency-free Python experiments: a 480-scenario in-memory DAG study and a 96-scenario controlled file-processing study using generated temporary files. The evidence rejects the assumption that sparse random auditing alone makes incomplete dependency tracking safe; it does not prove general workflow correctness or deployed-system performance. Version 1.0 is not peer reviewed.
ER -