Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
178,970 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDHealth economics review

Firm structure, organisational capacity, and employer health insurance provision in Oman: a cross-sectional mediation study.

  1. 1University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Al Mussannah, Oman. [email protected].
  2. 2University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Al Mussannah, Oman.
  3. 3Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman.

Abstract

Background

Employer mandates are a central mechanism for expanding universal health coverage (UHC). In Oman, the Dhamani platform a national digital health-insurance system mandates private-sector coverage under Capital Market Authority Resolution 78/2019. Full national rollout commenced in 2025, creating an urgent need for pre-implementation employer-readiness evidence.Objective

To describe formal employer health-insurance provision rates across Omani private-sector firms, to identify firm structural factors independently associated with provision, and to assess whether organisational resource capacity mediates the firm size-provision relationship.Methods

Cross-sectional employer survey (n = 222) conducted prior to full Dhamani enforcement, using stratified purposive sampling by firm size and sector. Multivariable logistic regression (Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration, ROC AUC discrimination, VIF multicollinearity checks, Box-Tidwell linearity test, Firth penalized sensitivity analysis) and bootstrapped mediation analysis (5,000 resamples; bias-corrected 95% CI as primary inferential result) were used.Results

Formal provision was 36.5% overall (95% CI: 30.2-43.1%), ranging from 10.8% among micro-enterprises to 81.0% among large firms (Cramér's V = 0.573, p < 0.001). Organisational resource capacity was the strongest independent predictor (AOR = 31.51, 95% CI: 11.82-84.01, p < 0.001). The bootstrapped indirect effect of firm size on provision through capacity was 0.413 (bias-corrected 95% CI: 0.189-0.687), representing 30.3% of the total association. Model discrimination was good (ROC AUC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93) and calibration was acceptable (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.45). A post-stratification weighted estimate adjusting for micro-enterprise oversampling was 21.9% (95% CI: 17.0-26.8%). The most common barriers among non-insuring firms were absence of a legal mandate (51.8%) and high premium costs (49.6%).Conclusions

Firm size and organisational resource capacity are strongly associated with formal health-insurance provision. Phased Dhamani enrollment targeting large firms first, premium subsidies, and administrative support for micro- and small enterprises are the evidence-indicated policy responses.

Related

  1. Maternal critical care infrastructure and organisational preparedness in Türkiye: a national analysis of the MaCriCare cross-sectional survey
    Dudu Berrin Günaydın, Selin Erel, Miray Gözde Özdemir +4
    Annals of medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Associations between early antidepressant exposure, affective states, and subjective sleep quality among euthymic depressive-onset bipolar patients: a cross-sectional parallel mediation analysis
    Jing Ma, Shiming Liang, Mingjin Wang +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  3. Association between physical activity and quality of life among breast cancer survivors in China: a cross-sectional mediation analysis
    Yingjie Yao, Qinqin Cheng, Andy S K Cheng +4
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textOncologyCrossref
  4. Analysis of the subject-object effects and chain mediation of psychosocial factors in couples during late pregnancy on depression: a cross-sectional study of pregnant women and their spouses
    Yunhui Shi, Han Wang, Wenhui Han +1
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Regarding Dental Insurance among Dental Professionals in Bengaluru City: A Cross-sectional Survey
    Syeda Rabiya Iqbal, Shweta Somasundara Yale, C. N. Aruna +1
    Journal of Indian Association of Public Health DentistryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{kwatra2026firm,
  title = {{Firm structure, organisational capacity, and employer health insurance provision in Oman: a cross-sectional mediation study.}},
  author = {Neetu Kwatra and Nihad Al Zadjali and Sultana Al Sabahi and Zuhair Al Sulti},
  journal = {Health economics review},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s13561-026-00831-y},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900267},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Firm structure, organisational capacity, and employer health insurance provision in Oman: a cross-sectional mediation study.
AU  - Neetu Kwatra
AU  - Nihad Al Zadjali
AU  - Sultana Al Sabahi
AU  - Zuhair Al Sulti
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Health economics review
DO  - 10.1186/s13561-026-00831-y
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900267
AB  - Background  Employer mandates are a central mechanism for expanding universal health coverage (UHC). In Oman, the Dhamani platform a national digital health-insurance system mandates private-sector coverage under Capital Market Authority Resolution 78/2019. Full national rollout commenced in 2025, creating an urgent need for pre-implementation employer-readiness evidence.Objective  To describe formal employer health-insurance provision rates across Omani private-sector firms, to identify firm structural factors independently associated with provision, and to assess whether organisational resource capacity mediates the firm size-provision relationship.Methods  Cross-sectional employer survey (n = 222) conducted prior to full Dhamani enforcement, using stratified purposive sampling by firm size and sector. Multivariable logistic regression (Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration, ROC AUC discrimination, VIF multicollinearity checks, Box-Tidwell linearity test, Firth penalized sensitivity analysis) and bootstrapped mediation analysis (5,000 resamples; bias-corrected 95% CI as primary inferential result) were used.Results  Formal provision was 36.5% overall (95% CI: 30.2-43.1%), ranging from 10.8% among micro-enterprises to 81.0% among large firms (Cramér's V = 0.573, p < 0.001). Organisational resource capacity was the strongest independent predictor (AOR = 31.51, 95% CI: 11.82-84.01, p < 0.001). The bootstrapped indirect effect of firm size on provision through capacity was 0.413 (bias-corrected 95% CI: 0.189-0.687), representing 30.3% of the total association. Model discrimination was good (ROC AUC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93) and calibration was acceptable (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.45). A post-stratification weighted estimate adjusting for micro-enterprise oversampling was 21.9% (95% CI: 17.0-26.8%). The most common barriers among non-insuring firms were absence of a legal mandate (51.8%) and high premium costs (49.6%).Conclusions  Firm size and organisational resource capacity are strongly associated with formal health-insurance provision. Phased Dhamani enrollment targeting large firms first, premium subsidies, and administrative support for micro- and small enterprises are the evidence-indicated policy responses.
SN  - 2191-1991
ER  -