Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAcademic pediatrics

An ACEs Life Course Health Development Framework to Guide Prevention and Mitigation

  1. 1Center for Healthier Children, Families & Communities, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
  2. 2Department of Pediatrics, Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
  3. 3Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA

Abstract

Prevention of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and mitigation of their impacts on lifelong health and wellbeing are public health priorities. Current prevention and mitigation efforts lack a comprehensive, actionable and widely adopted conceptual framework to guide research, policy and practice. To address this shortcoming we propose an ACEs Life Course Health Development (ACEs LCHD) framework that integrates Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Model, the Family Stress Model, the Stress Continuum and other relational development theories. A life course framework is especially pertinent because it explains and specifies mechanisms linking early life adversity and later life physical and mental health challenges. It incorporates intergenerational and historic cultural factors including parents' own life histories that can play a powerful role in either perpetuating and compounding or resisting adversity. It demonstrates how ACEs occur in the context of developmental ecosystems - multi-layered family, community and societal milieu in which children live, learn, play and grow. Strengths and vulnerabilities in each level of these ecosystems across the life course can either buffer or amplify the effects of adversity. Unlike previous ACEs or trauma informed frameworks, the ACEs LCHD framework unites developmental timing, intergenerational influences and ecological context within one integrative systems approach. It points to four action-step priorities: 1) Create developmental ecosystems maps and apply a complex systems science approach to their analysis; 2) Address root causes and mitigate the impact of ACEs on health development trajectories; 3) Identify and act on leverage points; and 4) Enable collaborative action. Child health providers cannot do all this alone but can contribute to local cross-sector coalitions to co-develop interdisciplinary multi-level action, advocate for trauma informed practice and connect children and families to evidence-based interventions to prevent and mitigate ACEs.

Related

  1. Association of life course type 2 diabetes duration with adverse cardiac structure independent of current glycaemia in the British MRC National Survey of Health and Development Birth Cohort
    Lamia Al Saikhan, Nishi Chaturvedi, Arjun K Ghosh +2
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossref
  2. Development and evaluation of an elective course on digital health in pharmacy curriculum
    Elsy Ramia, Maya Zeineddine, Reine El Khoury +1
    BMC Medical EducationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  3. Development of a multimodal health education module for dementia prevention in at-risk rural Indian elders: a SMRUTHI INDIA initiative
    Kritika Sharma, Aditi Dubey, Shubham Gupta +57
    Frontiers in dementiaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Patient-centered access to mental health care at selected life-course stages: a scoping review using the Levesque framework
    Jan Christopher Cwik, Moritz Hess, Claudia Kardys +7
    BMC Health Services ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  5. Development of a multidisciplinary service-delivery framework for venous thromboembolism prevention in hospitalized medical patients with lung cancer: a mixed-methods modified Delphi study
    Yanhong Meng, Sijia Zhong, Yuhang Ding +4
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{kinsey2026aces,
  title = {{An ACEs Life Course Health Development Framework to Guide Prevention and Mitigation}},
  author = {Jane Kinsey and Shirley Ann Russ and Adam Schickedanz and Neal Halfon},
  journal = {Academic pediatrics},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.acap.2026.103444},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2026.103444},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - An ACEs Life Course Health Development Framework to Guide Prevention and Mitigation
AU  - Jane Kinsey
AU  - Shirley Ann Russ
AU  - Adam Schickedanz
AU  - Neal Halfon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
JO  - Academic pediatrics
DO  - 10.1016/j.acap.2026.103444
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2026.103444
AB  - Prevention of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and mitigation of their impacts on lifelong health and wellbeing are public health priorities. Current prevention and mitigation efforts lack a comprehensive, actionable and widely adopted conceptual framework to guide research, policy and practice. To address this shortcoming we propose an ACEs Life Course Health Development (ACEs LCHD) framework that integrates Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Model, the Family Stress Model, the Stress Continuum and other relational development theories. A life course framework is especially pertinent because it explains and specifies mechanisms linking early life adversity and later life physical and mental health challenges. It incorporates intergenerational and historic cultural factors including parents' own life histories that can play a powerful role in either perpetuating and compounding or resisting adversity. It demonstrates how ACEs occur in the context of developmental ecosystems - multi-layered family, community and societal milieu in which children live, learn, play and grow. Strengths and vulnerabilities in each level of these ecosystems across the life course can either buffer or amplify the effects of adversity. Unlike previous ACEs or trauma informed frameworks, the ACEs LCHD framework unites developmental timing, intergenerational influences and ecological context within one integrative systems approach. It points to four action-step priorities: 1) Create developmental ecosystems maps and apply a complex systems science approach to their analysis; 2) Address root causes and mitigate the impact of ACEs on health development trajectories; 3) Identify and act on leverage points; and 4) Enable collaborative action. Child health providers cannot do all this alone but can contribute to local cross-sector coalitions to co-develop interdisciplinary multi-level action, advocate for trauma informed practice and connect children and families to evidence-based interventions to prevent and mitigate ACEs.
SN  - 1876-2859
SN  - 1876-2867
ER  -