Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Plant Science

Metabolic memory in fruit ripening: bidirectional crosstalk between metabolism and epigenetic regulation

Abstract

Fruit ripening is a complex developmental process traditionally viewed as being regulated by hormones, transcription factors, and epigenetic modifications in a largely unidirectional manner—with epigenetics acting upstream and metabolism downstream. However, emerging evidence challenges this linear paradigm, revealing that key metabolic intermediates function not merely as outputs of ripening but as critical inputs that shape the epigenetic landscape. This review synthesizes recent advances demonstrating that S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), acetyl-CoA, and NAD+ serve as core metabolic “fuels,” with ethylene and polyamines acting as downstream branches and feedback amplifiers within the SAM hub that directly modulate the activity of DNA methyltransferases, histone acetyltransferases, and sirtuin deacetylases, while epigenetic marks may reinforce metabolic states through positive feedback loops. Recent studies have further revealed that metabolic intermediates function as nexus points bridging phytohormone signaling and epigenetic regulation, with SAM, acetyl-CoA, and NAD+ serving dual functions in both hormone biosynthesis and epigenetic modifications. We propose that this metabolic–epigenetic bidirectional crosstalk may constitute a “metabolic memory”-like mechanism that contributes to the irreversibility of fruit ripening, rather than providing a fully established explanation. In this review, we operationally define fruit-ripening metabolic memory as a self-reinforcing regulatory state in which metabolic intermediates alter epigenetic marks, and these marks persist beyond the initial metabolic signal and feed back to stabilize metabolic and ripening gene expression programs. Recent transgenic tomato studies engineered to overaccumulate spermidine and spermine provide evidence consistent with this model: metabolic activity was revived even at late developmental stages, with reactivation of cellular programs underlying nitrogen: carbon signaling, energy and glucose metabolism. However, we distinguish direct mechanistic evidence, functional evidence, and correlative evidence throughout the review, and we present the integrated model as a testable framework. By integrating findings from tomato, strawberry, apple, banana, peach, and grape, we present a unified framework in which metabolism and epigenetics operate as an interconnected regulatory network rather than as separate hierarchical layers. We also identify critical knowledge gaps and outline future directions, including the need for real-time metabolic flux analysis coupled with epigenomic profiling, single-cell resolution studies, and exploration of transgenerational inheritance of ripening-related metabolic memory.

Related

  1. Mitochondrial metabolism and epigenetic crosstalk drive SASP
    Hélène Martini, Jodie Birch, Francisco Madeira Marques +26
    NaturePeer-reviewedCC BY16 citedCell biologyPhysiologyOpenAlex
  2. Multidimensional regulation of hepatic macrophages in chronic liver disease: from metabolic reprogramming to intercellular and interorgan crosstalk
    Che Xu, Xin-Yu Zhu, Hai-Na Xie +3
    Frontiers in immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMC
  3. CTR1-mediated copper uptake orchestrates metabolic-epigenetic regulation of pathogenic TH17 cells in autoimmune disease
    L. Noyer, L. Wang, M. Jishage +7
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textImmunologybioRxiv
  4. Lactate metabolism and lactylation in uveal melanoma: from metabolic adaptation to immune regulation
    Yingluan Wang, Zhan Cao, Dawei Sun +1
    Frontiers in immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMC
  5. Cellular Crosstalk at the Gut-Liver Interface in Liver Cirrhosis: Epithelial Barrier Failure, Bacterial Translocation and Immune Activation as a Bidirectional Network.
    Thomas N Nitsotolis, Stelios F Assimakopoulos, Eleftheria Mastoridou +8
    CellsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCell biologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{yang2026metabolic,
  title = {{Metabolic memory in fruit ripening: bidirectional crosstalk between metabolism and epigenetic regulation}},
  author = {Zhi Yang and Chuanjiang Zhang and Lihu Wang and Minjuan Lin and Zhenlei Wang},
  journal = {Frontiers in Plant Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fpls.2026.2003849},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.2003849},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Metabolic memory in fruit ripening: bidirectional crosstalk between metabolism and epigenetic regulation
AU  - Zhi Yang
AU  - Chuanjiang Zhang
AU  - Lihu Wang
AU  - Minjuan Lin
AU  - Zhenlei Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - Frontiers in Plant Science
DO  - 10.3389/fpls.2026.2003849
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.2003849
AB  - Fruit ripening is a complex developmental process traditionally viewed as being regulated by hormones, transcription factors, and epigenetic modifications in a largely unidirectional manner—with epigenetics acting upstream and metabolism downstream. However, emerging evidence challenges this linear paradigm, revealing that key metabolic intermediates function not merely as outputs of ripening but as critical inputs that shape the epigenetic landscape. This review synthesizes recent advances demonstrating that S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), acetyl-CoA, and NAD+ serve as core metabolic “fuels,” with ethylene and polyamines acting as downstream branches and feedback amplifiers within the SAM hub that directly modulate the activity of DNA methyltransferases, histone acetyltransferases, and sirtuin deacetylases, while epigenetic marks may reinforce metabolic states through positive feedback loops. Recent studies have further revealed that metabolic intermediates function as nexus points bridging phytohormone signaling and epigenetic regulation, with SAM, acetyl-CoA, and NAD+ serving dual functions in both hormone biosynthesis and epigenetic modifications. We propose that this metabolic–epigenetic bidirectional crosstalk may constitute a “metabolic memory”-like mechanism that contributes to the irreversibility of fruit ripening, rather than providing a fully established explanation. In this review, we operationally define fruit-ripening metabolic memory as a self-reinforcing regulatory state in which metabolic intermediates alter epigenetic marks, and these marks persist beyond the initial metabolic signal and feed back to stabilize metabolic and ripening gene expression programs. Recent transgenic tomato studies engineered to overaccumulate spermidine and spermine provide evidence consistent with this model: metabolic activity was revived even at late developmental stages, with reactivation of cellular programs underlying nitrogen: carbon signaling, energy and glucose metabolism. However, we distinguish direct mechanistic evidence, functional evidence, and correlative evidence throughout the review, and we present the integrated model as a testable framework. By integrating findings from tomato, strawberry, apple, banana, peach, and grape, we present a unified framework in which metabolism and epigenetics operate as an interconnected regulatory network rather than as separate hierarchical layers. We also identify critical knowledge gaps and outline future directions, including the need for real-time metabolic flux analysis coupled with epigenomic profiling, single-cell resolution studies, and exploration of transgenerational inheritance of ripening-related metabolic memory.
SN  - 1664-462X
ER  -