Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,125 studies31 sourcesUpdated 25 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Service-oriented reallocation and value-added intensity in China’s sport industry, 2018–2024: A longitudinal accounting analysis

  1. 1School of Physical Education, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  2. 2School of Management, Qujing Normal University, Qujing, Yunnan, China
  3. 3School of Physical Education, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan, China

Abstract

China’s sport industry expanded while its composition shifted toward services during 2018–2024, but both the accounting mechanisms behind this change and the robustness of the pattern to the COVID-19 disruption and relative-price movements require careful qualification. We analyze annual national sport-industry accounts published by the National Bureau of Statistics of China and the General Administration of Sport. The analysis combines value-added shares, value-added intensity, a descriptive service-to-manufacturing value-added ratio, shift-share decompositions, alternative time windows, a proxy-based price sensitivity analysis, and crisis–recovery indicators. The service share of sport-industry value added increased from 64.8% in 2018 to 72.0% in 2024, while the manufacturing share declined from 33.7% to 26.5%. Aggregate value-added intensity rose from 37.9% to 41.7%. For 2018–2024, the decomposition assigns +2.50 percentage points to changes in category output weights, + 1.44 points to within-category intensity changes, and −0.13 points to their interaction. The between-category contribution remained positive in all alternative multi-year windows, although it was not always larger than the within-category contribution. Under the specified price-proxy scenario, the between-category contribution remained positive. Co-located services fell by 16.2% in value added in 2020 and rebounded by 24.6% in 2021, ending 4.4% above their 2019 level; education/training and media/information services did not contract in 2020. The published accounts therefore document a service-oriented reallocation over the observed period, alongside substantial post-shock within-category change and heterogeneous exposure across service activities. Because the series uses current-price data and crosses a 2023 census-benchmark break, the results should be interpreted as descriptive accounting patterns rather than causal estimates of productivity, policy effects, or pandemic mechanisms.

Related

  1. Is the End-Exercise Potentiated-Twitch Decrement a Regulated Variable? A Mechanism-Oriented Review of Muscle Fatigue During High-Intensity Aerobic Exercise.
    Arnulfo Ramos-Jiménez, Mariazel Rubio-Valles, Marina Trejo-Trejo +5
    Muscles (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Electroencephalographic gamma correlates with pain intensity attenuation in a prospective longitudinal study using an AI-powered digital device for pain self-management
    Bihua Bie, Maria L. Rosén Klement, Samer Ghosn +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  3. Longitudinal Associations of Cigarette Smoking, Smoking Intensity, and Smoking TrajectoriesWith Emergency Room Utilization Among U.S. Adults
    W. Guo, X. Yan, C. Tatsuoka
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  4. Decoupled but reconcilable: a nutrition-feasible global reallocation lowers dietary inflammation and environmental footprints simultaneously in every country
    S. Huang, X. Wang
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNutritionmedRxiv
  5. Adjuvant therapy and survival in children under three years with brain tumours: accounting for guarantee-time
    Nezihe Köker Özer, Ercan Yılmaz, Didem Tatar
    Egyptian Journal of NeurosurgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textHuman geneticsDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{peng2026serviceoriented,
  title = {{Service-oriented reallocation and value-added intensity in China’s sport industry, 2018–2024: A longitudinal accounting analysis}},
  author = {Qiuyuan Peng and Minglin Wu and Qiang Feng},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0354049},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354049},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Service-oriented reallocation and value-added intensity in China’s sport industry, 2018–2024: A longitudinal accounting analysis
AU  - Qiuyuan Peng
AU  - Minglin Wu
AU  - Qiang Feng
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0354049
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354049
AB  - China’s sport industry expanded while its composition shifted toward services during 2018–2024, but both the accounting mechanisms behind this change and the robustness of the pattern to the COVID-19 disruption and relative-price movements require careful qualification. We analyze annual national sport-industry accounts published by the National Bureau of Statistics of China and the General Administration of Sport. The analysis combines value-added shares, value-added intensity, a descriptive service-to-manufacturing value-added ratio, shift-share decompositions, alternative time windows, a proxy-based price sensitivity analysis, and crisis–recovery indicators. The service share of sport-industry value added increased from 64.8% in 2018 to 72.0% in 2024, while the manufacturing share declined from 33.7% to 26.5%. Aggregate value-added intensity rose from 37.9% to 41.7%. For 2018–2024, the decomposition assigns +2.50 percentage points to changes in category output weights, + 1.44 points to within-category intensity changes, and −0.13 points to their interaction. The between-category contribution remained positive in all alternative multi-year windows, although it was not always larger than the within-category contribution. Under the specified price-proxy scenario, the between-category contribution remained positive. Co-located services fell by 16.2% in value added in 2020 and rebounded by 24.6% in 2021, ending 4.4% above their 2019 level; education/training and media/information services did not contract in 2020. The published accounts therefore document a service-oriented reallocation over the observed period, alongside substantial post-shock within-category change and heterogeneous exposure across service activities. Because the series uses current-price data and crosses a 2023 census-benchmark break, the results should be interpreted as descriptive accounting patterns rather than causal estimates of productivity, policy effects, or pandemic mechanisms.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -