Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,785 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

Enhancers require an active resetting phase after transcriptional activation

  1. 1NATIONAL CENTRE FOR BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, BANGALORE, INDIA

Abstract

Signal-responsive enhancers must activate transcription and then return to a competent but inactive state, yet whether this transition is passive or actively driven has remained unresolved. We define this process as enhancer resetting and identify the androgen receptor (AR) as the factor that executes it as an endogenous response to estrogen signaling, independent of exogenous androgen. As estrogen receptor- (ER) undergoes ligand-induced proteasomal degradation during late-phase signaling, AR progressively accumulates in the nucleus and preferentially occupies highly active, persistent ER enhancers in a transcriptionally silent manner. This late-phase AR binding evicts the pioneer factor FOXA1 from chromatin while preserving baseline accessibility, a handoff mechanism that decouples chromatin openness from active transcription. Conversely, augmenting AR activity by DHT treatment or AR overexpression accelerates FOXA1 eviction, while disrupting AR chromatin binding, either by AR knockdown or a DNA-binding-deficient mutant, prevents it, leaving enhancers in an aberrantly permissive state that drives amplified ER rebinding and transcriptional hyperactivation upon subsequent estrogen stimulation. These findings establish active enhancer resetting as a mechanism safeguarding the fidelity of repeated transcriptional responses. Failure of this mechanism may underlie the transcriptional dysregulation that drives tumor progression and endocrine therapy resistance in ER-positive breast cancer, where estrogen signaling is chronic and cyclic.

Related

  1. Mega-enhancers compartmentalize transcriptionally active long genes in the brain
    Ziyu Zhao, Omar A. Payán Parra, Shin-ichiro Fujita +5
    Nature Cell BiologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text7 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlexPMC
  2. A Structural Model of Transcriptional Activation by Mediator
    A. Feklistov, R. D. Kornberg
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  3. NDFIP2 Suppresses Colorectal Cancer Metastasis Through DDX3X‐Dependent R‐Loop Remodeling and GNG13 Transcriptional Activation
    Enjian Zhang, Yanfang Li, Jiaxin Shu +10
    Advanced SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  4. O-GlcNAc Modification of CEBPB Promotes Astrocytic Pyroptosis by Activating NLRP3 Inflammasome Through Transcriptional Activation of IKKβ
    Xunhu Gu, Yufeng Chen, Lili Zheng +6
    Experimental NeurobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  5. Seven amino acids gate transcriptional activation by a minimal MarA Helix turn-helix DNA-binding domain
    M. Corbella, A. Serrano, R. Bello-Madruga +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{najar2026enhancers,
  title = {{Enhancers require an active resetting phase after transcriptional activation}},
  author = {A. H. Najar and R. Mann and S. Indra and D. Soota and P. Kundu and S. Nidharshan and R. N. Vadnala and D. Notani},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.19.752844},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.19.752844v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Enhancers require an active resetting phase after transcriptional activation
AU  - A. H. Najar
AU  - R. Mann
AU  - S. Indra
AU  - D. Soota
AU  - P. Kundu
AU  - S. Nidharshan
AU  - R. N. Vadnala
AU  - D. Notani
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/19
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.19.752844
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.19.752844v1
AB  - Signal-responsive enhancers must activate transcription and then return to a competent but inactive state, yet whether this transition is passive or actively driven has remained unresolved. We define this process as enhancer resetting and identify the androgen receptor (AR) as the factor that executes it as an endogenous response to estrogen signaling, independent of exogenous androgen. As estrogen receptor- (ER) undergoes ligand-induced proteasomal degradation during late-phase signaling, AR progressively accumulates in the nucleus and preferentially occupies highly active, persistent ER enhancers in a transcriptionally silent manner. This late-phase AR binding evicts the pioneer factor FOXA1 from chromatin while preserving baseline accessibility, a handoff mechanism that decouples chromatin openness from active transcription. Conversely, augmenting AR activity by DHT treatment or AR overexpression accelerates FOXA1 eviction, while disrupting AR chromatin binding, either by AR knockdown or a DNA-binding-deficient mutant, prevents it, leaving enhancers in an aberrantly permissive state that drives amplified ER rebinding and transcriptional hyperactivation upon subsequent estrogen stimulation. These findings establish active enhancer resetting as a mechanism safeguarding the fidelity of repeated transcriptional responses. Failure of this mechanism may underlie the transcriptional dysregulation that drives tumor progression and endocrine therapy resistance in ER-positive breast cancer, where estrogen signaling is chronic and cyclic.
ER  -