PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv
The Covering Radius of the Reed--Muller Code RM(1,9) is 242
Abstract
What is the covering radius of the Reed--Muller code RM(1,9) ? This is a long-standing open problem in cryptography and coding theory. In this paper, we resolve this problem, and prove that the covering radius of RM(1,9) is 242. We exclude nonlinearity 244 by obtaining a cubic Boolean function achieving a sharp Walsh ℓ1 bound. Its equality cases reduce either to an impossible cubic hyperplane restriction or to two homogeneous cubic forms in the Brier--Langevin classification. To exclude nonlinearity 243, we deduce the inequality ‖ Wg‖ 1+2|Wg(0)|≤ 10368, and then reduce either to a spectrum bounded by 24 or to the same expression to be at least 10496.
Related
- The Covering Radius of the Reed--Muller Code \texorpdfstring{RM(3,8)}{RM(3,8)} is 56
- The covering radius of the first-order Reed-Muller code in nine variables is 242
- The Projective Reed-Muller Code from Quartic Curves in the Projective Plane
- Covering Radius and Deep Holes of Hyperderivative Reed-Solomon Codes under the NRT Metric
- Common zeros of homogeneous polynomials and the weight hierarchy of projective Reed-Muller codes
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026covering,
title = {{The Covering Radius of the Reed--Muller Code RM(1,9) is 242}},
author = {Qichun Wang and Yueying Lou and Zifan Wang},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.17871},
eprint = {2610.17871},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17871},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The Covering Radius of the Reed--Muller Code RM(1,9) is 242
AU - Qichun Wang
AU - Yueying Lou
AU - Zifan Wang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/13
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.17871
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17871
AB - What is the covering radius of the Reed--Muller code RM(1,9) ? This is a long-standing open problem in cryptography and coding theory. In this paper, we resolve this problem, and prove that the covering radius of RM(1,9) is 242. We exclude nonlinearity 244 by obtaining a cubic Boolean function achieving a sharp Walsh ℓ^1 bound. Its equality cases reduce either to an impossible cubic hyperplane restriction or to two homogeneous cubic forms in the Brier--Langevin classification. To exclude nonlinearity 243, we deduce the inequality ‖ W_g‖ _1+2|W_g(0)|≤ 10368, and then reduce either to a spectrum bounded by 24 or to the same expression to be at least 10496.
ER -