Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Delay-Certified Readiness Barriers for Overactuated Multirotor Allocation Without Lipschitz Constants

Abstract

Overactuated multirotors can produce the same wrench with many rotor-speed combinations, some of which leave the vehicle unable to change its wrench quickly, e.g., to reject a gust. Readiness barriers keep this ability, the readiness, above a floor, but only in continuous time; with sampled commands and varying speed-controller delays, the available robustness bound covers less than one millisecond. We remove this limit by exploiting the structure of the problem: each rotor responds monotonically and in closed form to its own torque, so the speeds reachable under uncertain switching times lie in a cheaply computed box, and the lowest readiness over that box sits at a corner known in advance. This yields a Lipschitz-free test that a command keeps the readiness above its floor until the next sample, plus a fallback torque that keeps the vehicle on a certified plan. In hexarotor simulations with 2--40~ms delays and ±2~ms jitter, the filter never violated the floor. At 10±2~ms, it matched a delay-compensating predictor within the design envelope and cost 2--30\% more tracking error beyond it, where the predictor alone violated the floor in 2 to 16 of 16 missions.

Related

  1. Readiness Barrier Functions: Forward-Invariant Control Authority for Overactuated Multirotor Allocation
    Giuseppe Silano
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Experimental validation of robust full-pose tracking for fully and overactuated multirotors
    Mohamad Hachem, Clément Roos, Thierry Miquel +1
    Control Engineering PracticePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  3. Swarmlet: a GPU-resident reformulated vortex particle method for coupled multirotor aerodynamics and flight dynamics
    Wyatt James Horne
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingFluid dynamicsarXiv
  4. Low regularity maps on Lipschitz manifolds: lifting, pullback of forms, and approximation
    Antoine Detaille, Kai Xiao
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  5. Limit theory for Lipschitz-localized statistics in random geometric models
    Bartlomiej Blaszczyszyn, D. Yogeshwaran, J. E. Yukich
    HALPreprintLicence not statedFull textGeneral mathematicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{silano2026delaycertified,
  title = {{Delay-Certified Readiness Barriers for Overactuated Multirotor Allocation Without Lipschitz Constants}},
  author = {Giuseppe Silano},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.03490},
  eprint = {2611.03490},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03490},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Delay-Certified Readiness Barriers for Overactuated Multirotor Allocation Without Lipschitz Constants
AU  - Giuseppe Silano
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.03490
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03490
AB  - Overactuated multirotors can produce the same wrench with many rotor-speed combinations, some of which leave the vehicle unable to change its wrench quickly, e.g., to reject a gust. Readiness barriers keep this ability, the readiness, above a floor, but only in continuous time; with sampled commands and varying speed-controller delays, the available robustness bound covers less than one millisecond. We remove this limit by exploiting the structure of the problem: each rotor responds monotonically and in closed form to its own torque, so the speeds reachable under uncertain switching times lie in a cheaply computed box, and the lowest readiness over that box sits at a corner known in advance. This yields a Lipschitz-free test that a command keeps the readiness above its floor until the next sample, plus a fallback torque that keeps the vehicle on a certified plan. In hexarotor simulations with 2--40~ms delays and ±2~ms jitter, the filter never violated the floor. At 10±2~ms, it matched a delay-compensating predictor within the design envelope and cost 2--30\% more tracking error beyond it, where the predictor alone violated the floor in 2 to 16 of 16 missions.
ER  -