Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

From Type to Token: Petri Nets, Individual Token Philosophy, and Individualized Causal Effects

Abstract

Structural Causal Models and Bayesian Networks are the dominant framework for representing causal relations. They are fundamentally type-level formalisms since their estimands, Average Treatment Effects and Conditional Average Treatment Effects, are properties of distributions over populations, not of individual units. When treatment effects exhibit unbounded heterogeneity, these estimands collapse. What persists is the structural, token-level core of causation. We argue that Petri Nets under the Individual Token Philosophy are the natural representation of these token-level causal structures. We develop a formal translation from Bayesian Networks to Petri Nets, providing a two-layer account of individualized causality. The PN layer provides a structural representation of causal mechanisms that does not rest on distributional assumptions. In turn, a conformal prediction layer quantifies causal effects with finite-sample coverage guarantees. Together they constitute a complete account of individual causal effects.

Related

  1. Local conformal prediction for individual causal effects
    Fernando Delbianco, Fernando Tohme
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. lepidoptera: A Domain-Agnostic Engine for Causal Simulation with Mixed Variable Types, Vine Copula Dependence, and Individual-Level Counterfactual Propagation
    Danilo Augusto Sarti
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Mixed-effects two-stage residual inclusion methods for individual patient data meta-analysis: A methodological framework for causal inference in survival analysis
    Heather Hufstedler, Alexander M. Danzer, Valentijn Marnix Theodoor de Jong +1
    Research Synthesis MethodsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsPMC
  4. Universal Properties of Petri Net Unfoldings
    Serge Lechenne, Hugo Paquet
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. Group Petri Nets: Structural and Algebraic Models for Finite Groups and Their Subgroups
    Girish K P
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{delbianco2026from,
  title = {{From Type to Token: Petri Nets, Individual Token Philosophy, and Individualized Causal Effects}},
  author = {Fernando Delbianco and Fernando Tohmé and Gustavo Bodanza},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.05703},
  eprint = {2611.05703},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05703},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - From Type to Token: Petri Nets, Individual Token Philosophy, and Individualized Causal Effects
AU  - Fernando Delbianco
AU  - Fernando Tohmé
AU  - Gustavo Bodanza
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.05703
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05703
AB  - Structural Causal Models and Bayesian Networks are the dominant framework for representing causal relations. They are fundamentally type-level formalisms since their estimands, Average Treatment Effects and Conditional Average Treatment Effects, are properties of distributions over populations, not of individual units. When treatment effects exhibit unbounded heterogeneity, these estimands collapse. What persists is the structural, token-level core of causation. We argue that Petri Nets under the Individual Token Philosophy are the natural representation of these token-level causal structures. We develop a formal translation from Bayesian Networks to Petri Nets, providing a two-layer account of individualized causality. The PN layer provides a structural representation of causal mechanisms that does not rest on distributional assumptions. In turn, a conformal prediction layer quantifies causal effects with finite-sample coverage guarantees. Together they constitute a complete account of individual causal effects.
ER  -