Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Personal preference or system role? Battery swapping among UK electric vehicle users

Abstract

Battery swapping replaces a depleted EV battery with a charged one, reducing waiting time and enabling off-peak charging. Evidence on acceptance, however, remains concentrated in Asian markets, and most studies examine individual adoption intentions. This study asks whether current UK EV users judge swapping differently as a purchase option and as a technology for the transport system. Using Behavioural Reasoning Theory, an integrated choice and latent variable model, and latent class analysis, we analyse perceived usefulness, energy-system concerns, practical barriers, and satisfaction with current charging. Usefulness and energy-system concerns relate more strongly to expectations about the system. Battery compatibility and station coverage relate more strongly to personal preference, while spare battery costs relate to expectations about network viability. User groups differ in how they balance benefits, barriers, and satisfaction with existing charging. Policy should address driver barriers and network viability as distinct but connected priorities.

Related

  1. Designing battery swapping and charging networks for electric freight transport under demand uncertainty
    Yujia Xu, Walid Klibi, Benoit Montreuil
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Optimal Control of a Non-Stationary Inventory-Queue, with Applications to EV-Battery Swapping
    Hanyu Cheng, David Yao
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Probabilistic Forecasting of Electric Vehicle Charging in a Time-varying Hierarchical Infrastructure
    Guillaume Principato, Yvenn Amara-Ouali, Yannig Goude +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Carbon-Aware Electric Vehicle Routing Problem with Decision-Focused Learning
    Jaume Reixach, Wanru Chen, Jiaming Wu +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Combining optimal low emission zones scheduling and electric vehicle purchase incentives for transport policy backcasting
    Asmae Alami, Vinith Lakshmanan, Antonio Sciarretta
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlHAL
BibTeX
@misc{parmar2026personal,
  title = {{Personal preference or system role? Battery swapping among UK electric vehicle users}},
  author = {Janak Parmar and Huseyin Ayan and Dilum Dissanayake and Margaret Bell},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.37269},
  eprint = {2610.37269},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37269},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Personal preference or system role? Battery swapping among UK electric vehicle users
AU  - Janak Parmar
AU  - Huseyin Ayan
AU  - Dilum Dissanayake
AU  - Margaret Bell
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.37269
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37269
AB  - Battery swapping replaces a depleted EV battery with a charged one, reducing waiting time and enabling off-peak charging. Evidence on acceptance, however, remains concentrated in Asian markets, and most studies examine individual adoption intentions. This study asks whether current UK EV users judge swapping differently as a purchase option and as a technology for the transport system. Using Behavioural Reasoning Theory, an integrated choice and latent variable model, and latent class analysis, we analyse perceived usefulness, energy-system concerns, practical barriers, and satisfaction with current charging. Usefulness and energy-system concerns relate more strongly to expectations about the system. Battery compatibility and station coverage relate more strongly to personal preference, while spare battery costs relate to expectations about network viability. User groups differ in how they balance benefits, barriers, and satisfaction with existing charging. Policy should address driver barriers and network viability as distinct but connected priorities.
ER  -