Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Breastfeeding Interruption and Resumption: A Risk-Based Clinical Decision Framework

  1. 1Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
  2. 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cuza Voda Hospital, 700038 Iasi, Romania

Abstract

Lactating women often need medication, contrast-enhanced or nuclear imaging, or treatment for infection, and each raises the question of whether breastfeeding can continue. Advice is frequently binary, and in some settings interruption may be recommended more readily than the evidence warrants. This narrative review proposes that breastfeeding interruption be managed as a clinical decision with three linked components: whether interruption is necessary, its minimum necessary duration and the criterion for resumption. We distinguish the hazard of an agent, the infant’s actual exposure and the resulting clinical risk, and apply a common sequence of questions to maternal pharmacotherapy, contrast media, radiopharmaceuticals and selected maternal infections, using pharmacokinetic, dosimetric or transmission measures. The evidence base remains limited and heterogeneous: in a major lactation database, 54% of listed medications had no breastfeeding safety data, and no direct measurement of contrast-media absorption in breastfed infants was identified. The proposed framework grades management across five levels, from unrestricted breastfeeding to avoidance or definitive cessation; whether a restriction is temporary or definitive follows the applicable guidance, and resumption criteria are defined at the outset. This conceptual aid is not a validated decision rule, does not replace agent-, procedure-, radionuclide- or pathogen-specific guidance and requires prospective evaluation.

Related

  1. Quality of Movement Assessment after ACL Reconstruction in Youth: A Clinical Framework to Guide Rehabilitation and Return-to-Sport Decision-Making
    International journal of sports physical therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Real-world evaluation of a multilingual agentic retrieval-augmented clinical AI framework for evidence-grounded medical decision support
    Mohammad Hossein Imani, Mohammad Hasannejad, Amir Hossein Imani +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Identifying and formulating appropriate clinical problems for clinical prediction models and AI decision support: the RIVU-AI framework.
    Jeff Choi, Jayson Marwaha, Gary S Collins
    BMJ digital health & AIPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  4. Clinical Reasoning, Pathophysiology, and Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care: A Conceptual Framework for Integrating Decision-Making
    Álvaro Réa-Neto, Jeane Cristina Fonseca Vieira
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Systemic corticosteroids in critical illness: an evidence-based framework for clinical decision-making
    Yu-Wen Chang, Chun-Fu Chung, Suey-Haur Lee +4
    European Journal of Clinical PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
BibTeX
@article{petroaie2026breastfeeding,
  title = {{Breastfeeding Interruption and Resumption: A Risk-Based Clinical Decision Framework}},
  author = {Antoneta Dacia Petroaie and Alexandru Carauleanu and Iustina Petra Solomon Condriuc and Eric Oliviu Cosovanu and Elena Teona Cosovanu and Oana Raluca Temneanu and Ana Maria Slanina and Elena Popa and Adorata Elena Coman},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15208148},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8148},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Breastfeeding Interruption and Resumption: A Risk-Based Clinical Decision Framework
AU  - Antoneta Dacia Petroaie
AU  - Alexandru Carauleanu
AU  - Iustina Petra Solomon Condriuc
AU  - Eric Oliviu Cosovanu
AU  - Elena Teona Cosovanu
AU  - Oana Raluca Temneanu
AU  - Ana Maria Slanina
AU  - Elena Popa
AU  - Adorata Elena Coman
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15208148
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/8148
AB  - Lactating women often need medication, contrast-enhanced or nuclear imaging, or treatment for infection, and each raises the question of whether breastfeeding can continue. Advice is frequently binary, and in some settings interruption may be recommended more readily than the evidence warrants. This narrative review proposes that breastfeeding interruption be managed as a clinical decision with three linked components: whether interruption is necessary, its minimum necessary duration and the criterion for resumption. We distinguish the hazard of an agent, the infant’s actual exposure and the resulting clinical risk, and apply a common sequence of questions to maternal pharmacotherapy, contrast media, radiopharmaceuticals and selected maternal infections, using pharmacokinetic, dosimetric or transmission measures. The evidence base remains limited and heterogeneous: in a major lactation database, 54% of listed medications had no breastfeeding safety data, and no direct measurement of contrast-media absorption in breastfed infants was identified. The proposed framework grades management across five levels, from unrestricted breastfeeding to avoidance or definitive cessation; whether a restriction is temporary or definitive follows the applicable guidance, and resumption criteria are defined at the outset. This conceptual aid is not a validated decision rule, does not replace agent-, procedure-, radionuclide- or pathogen-specific guidance and requires prospective evaluation.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -