Ultrasound with nerve stimulation versus ultrasound alone for obturator nerve block in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- 1Department of Anesthesiology, The People's Hospital of Yichun City, Jiangxi, China.
- 2Department of Nursing, The People's Hospital of Yichun City, Jiangxi, China.
- 3Department of Neurology, The People's Hospital of Yichun City, Jiangxi, China.
Abstract
Background
The obturator nerve block (ONB) is commonly used during transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) to prevent adductor spasm. Both ultrasound (US)-guided and nerve stimulation (NS) techniques are available, but whether adding NS to US improves block outcomes remains debated.Methods
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to 6 April 2026. The rate of adductor spasm prevention, block performance time, onset time, number of needle passes, patient and surgeon satisfaction, and complications were evaluated. Pooled odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results
Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 451 patients were analyzed. The US + NS group significantly improved block rate of adductor spasm prevention compared to US alone (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.72-5.93, P < 0.001; I² =0%), but required longer performance time (MD = 1.99 min, 95% CI: 1.51-2.47, P < 0.001; I² =91%). No differences were found in needle passes or onset time. Complications were rare and comparable.Conclusions
Combining nerve stimulation with US guidance for ONB significantly improves rate of adductor spasm prevention and patient/surgeon satisfaction compared to US guidance alone, although with a longer block performance time. The two techniques are similar in onset time and needle passes. US + NS is recommended for ONB during TURBT.
Related
- A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing subpectineal and interfascial obturator nerve block techniques in preventing adductor muscle spasm during transurethral resection of bladder tumors.
- Minimally invasive vs standard surgical treatment: A systematic review comparing prostatic artery embolization and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
- Blue versus white light for transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
- Expression of STAT3 and STAT6 in Men with Large Versus Small Prostates Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
- Integrated Oral and Facial Prosthetic Rehabilitation Postoncologic Resection: A Modified Obturator Approach
BibTeX
@article{hu2026ultrasound,
title = {{Ultrasound with nerve stimulation versus ultrasound alone for obturator nerve block in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.}},
author = {Qun Hu and Luping Gan and Cui Ouyang and Li Peng and Changgen Zhong and Shengqiang Wang},
journal = {Saudi journal of anaesthesia},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.4103/sja.sja_368_26},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42960054},
note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Ultrasound with nerve stimulation versus ultrasound alone for obturator nerve block in transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
AU - Qun Hu
AU - Luping Gan
AU - Cui Ouyang
AU - Li Peng
AU - Changgen Zhong
AU - Shengqiang Wang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - Saudi journal of anaesthesia
DO - 10.4103/sja.sja_368_26
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42960054
AB - Background The obturator nerve block (ONB) is commonly used during transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) to prevent adductor spasm. Both ultrasound (US)-guided and nerve stimulation (NS) techniques are available, but whether adding NS to US improves block outcomes remains debated.Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to 6 April 2026. The rate of adductor spasm prevention, block performance time, onset time, number of needle passes, patient and surgeon satisfaction, and complications were evaluated. Pooled odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 451 patients were analyzed. The US + NS group significantly improved block rate of adductor spasm prevention compared to US alone (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.72-5.93, P < 0.001; I² =0%), but required longer performance time (MD = 1.99 min, 95% CI: 1.51-2.47, P < 0.001; I² =91%). No differences were found in needle passes or onset time. Complications were rare and comparable.Conclusions Combining nerve stimulation with US guidance for ONB significantly improves rate of adductor spasm prevention and patient/surgeon satisfaction compared to US guidance alone, although with a longer block performance time. The two techniques are similar in onset time and needle passes. US + NS is recommended for ONB during TURBT.
SN - 1658-354X
SN - 0975-3125
ER -