Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Medicine

Neural crosstalk between subchondral bone and synovium in osteoarthritis

  1. 1Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  2. 2Evidence-based Medicine Center, Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province (Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province), Luoyang, Henan, China
  3. 3School of Nursing, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Abstract

Osteoarthritis is a whole-joint disease involving articular cartilage, subchondral bone, synovium, vasculature, and peripheral nerves. However, whether joint innervation merely conveys nociceptive input or actively contributes to disease progression remains unresolved. This review integrates evidence on subchondral bone remodeling, synovial inflammation, neurovascular reorganization, and pain sensitization, and proposes a bidirectional neural crosstalk model between subchondral bone and synovium. In subchondral bone, abnormal mechanical loading and osteoclast activation promote sensory nerve ingrowth and neurovascular remodeling through Netrin-1–deleted in colorectal cancer receptor signaling, prostaglandin E2–prostaglandin E receptor 4 signaling, and Slit guidance ligand 3-related pathways. In the synovium, nerve growth factor and inflammatory mediators reinforce sensory sprouting, neuronal excitability, and neuropeptide release. Calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P, norepinephrine, and neuropeptide Y act on osteoclasts, osteoblast-lineage cells, fibroblast-like synoviocytes, macrophages, and endothelial cells, thereby linking neural activity to bone turnover, synovial immunity, and vascular remodeling. These signals converge on the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand–osteoprotegerin axis, nuclear factor-κB, and vascular endothelial growth factor-related pathways. Osteochondral channels, periosteal–synovial interfaces, and neurovascular networks may provide anatomical routes for this cross-compartment communication, forming a feedback circuit that sustains structural damage and chronic pain. Neural effects vary across disease stages and tissue compartments, and pain relief does not necessarily confer structural protection. Future therapies should therefore prioritize stage-specific and compartment-selective neuromodulation while assessing pain, function, and joint structural safety in parallel.

Related

  1. From MRI-defined bone marrow lesions to pain, structural progression, and subchondral remodeling in knee osteoarthritis: an integrated multi-database bibliometric and text-mining analysis
    Yousheng Zhang, Zihang Zhao
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. The emerging role of subchondral bone homeostasis in osteoarthritis.
    Antonia Donat, Weixin Xie, Assil-Ramin Alimy +3
    Journal of orthopaedic translationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Subchondral bone remodeling in knee osteoarthritis is coupled to lipid mobilization from bone marrow adipocytes
    L. Loisay, S. Bouagga, D. de Haro +8
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textPhysiologybioRxiv
  4. Pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation of subchondral bone in knee osteoarthritis
    José Fábio Lana, Daniel Jorge, João Protásio Netto +8
    Frontiers in Pain ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Differential Expression of ACAN, COL1A1, and COL2A1 in Cartilage and Synovium During Osteoarthritis Progression: An Observational Pilot Study Supported by Preliminary Bioinformatic Analysis
    Karolina Kopacz, Anna Litwin, Kamila Baran +8
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{feng2026neural,
  title = {{Neural crosstalk between subchondral bone and synovium in osteoarthritis}},
  author = {Yiran Feng and Qi Gao and Xiaoya Liu and Yapeng Li},
  journal = {Frontiers in Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1971392},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1971392},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Neural crosstalk between subchondral bone and synovium in osteoarthritis
AU  - Yiran Feng
AU  - Qi Gao
AU  - Xiaoya Liu
AU  - Yapeng Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Frontiers in Medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1971392
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1971392
AB  - Osteoarthritis is a whole-joint disease involving articular cartilage, subchondral bone, synovium, vasculature, and peripheral nerves. However, whether joint innervation merely conveys nociceptive input or actively contributes to disease progression remains unresolved. This review integrates evidence on subchondral bone remodeling, synovial inflammation, neurovascular reorganization, and pain sensitization, and proposes a bidirectional neural crosstalk model between subchondral bone and synovium. In subchondral bone, abnormal mechanical loading and osteoclast activation promote sensory nerve ingrowth and neurovascular remodeling through Netrin-1–deleted in colorectal cancer receptor signaling, prostaglandin E2–prostaglandin E receptor 4 signaling, and Slit guidance ligand 3-related pathways. In the synovium, nerve growth factor and inflammatory mediators reinforce sensory sprouting, neuronal excitability, and neuropeptide release. Calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P, norepinephrine, and neuropeptide Y act on osteoclasts, osteoblast-lineage cells, fibroblast-like synoviocytes, macrophages, and endothelial cells, thereby linking neural activity to bone turnover, synovial immunity, and vascular remodeling. These signals converge on the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand–osteoprotegerin axis, nuclear factor-κB, and vascular endothelial growth factor-related pathways. Osteochondral channels, periosteal–synovial interfaces, and neurovascular networks may provide anatomical routes for this cross-compartment communication, forming a feedback circuit that sustains structural damage and chronic pain. Neural effects vary across disease stages and tissue compartments, and pain relief does not necessarily confer structural protection. Future therapies should therefore prioritize stage-specific and compartment-selective neuromodulation while assessing pain, function, and joint structural safety in parallel.
SN  - 2296-858X
ER  -