Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

(Approximate) Symmetric Extension Complexity of the Spanning Tree Polytope

Abstract

We prove a tight lower bound on symmetric LP formulations for the spanning tree polytope of the complete graph. More precisely, let PST(Kn) be the spanning tree polytope of Kn. We show that, for all n≥13, every symmetric extended formulation for PST(Kn) has at least binom n3 inequalities. Since the classical Martin formulation has a symmetric formulation of size O(n3), this gives xcs(PST(Kn))=Θ(n3). We also study outer relaxations of the spanning tree polytope of Kn for maximization with nonnegative edge weights. We show that for every fixed approximation factor below 3/2, symmetric LP formulations still require Θ(n3) inequalities for all sufficiently large n, whereas factor 3/2 admits a formulation of size O(n2). Moreover, we provide an exact symmetric SDP formulation of size O(n2), measured by PSD matrix order, which implies xcpsd(PST(Kn))= Θ(n2). Thus symmetric LP and SDP sizes already differ for exact formulations, and for every fixed approximation factor 1≤β<3/2 for all sufficiently large n.

Related

  1. Fine asymptotics for approximate simulation of symmetric channels
    Valentinian Lungu, Aaron B. Wagner, Ioannis Kontoyiannis
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  2. Near-Optimal Complexity of Finding Approximate Local Minima of Nonconvex Finite Sums
    Qihao Zhou
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. A symmetric extension of Zhao's series for ζ(5)
    Noam Shalev
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. Conservative CSPs in Logspace are in Symmetric Linear Datalog (under complexity theoretic assumptions)
    Florian Starke
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  5. A Scale-Critical μ<3/8 Extension Principle for Spherically Symmetric Einstein-Scalar Field System
    Xinliang An, Haoyang Chen, Jaydeep Singh
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{pokutta2026approximate,
  title = {{(Approximate) Symmetric Extension Complexity of the Spanning Tree Polytope}},
  author = {Sebastian Pokutta},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2606.17017},
  eprint = {2606.17017},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17017},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - (Approximate) Symmetric Extension Complexity of the Spanning Tree Polytope
AU  - Sebastian Pokutta
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2606.17017
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17017
AB  - We prove a tight lower bound on symmetric LP formulations for the spanning tree polytope of the complete graph. More precisely, let P_ST(K_n) be the spanning tree polytope of K_n. We show that, for all n≥13, every symmetric extended formulation for P_ST(K_n) has at least binom n3 inequalities. Since the classical Martin formulation has a symmetric formulation of size O(n^3), this gives xcs(P_ST(K_n))=Θ(n^3). We also study outer relaxations of the spanning tree polytope of K_n for maximization with nonnegative edge weights. We show that for every fixed approximation factor below 3/2, symmetric LP formulations still require Θ(n^3) inequalities for all sufficiently large n, whereas factor 3/2 admits a formulation of size O(n^2). Moreover, we provide an exact symmetric SDP formulation of size O(n^2), measured by PSD matrix order, which implies xc_psd(P_ST(K_n))= Θ(n^2). Thus symmetric LP and SDP sizes already differ for exact formulations, and for every fixed approximation factor 1≤β<3/2 for all sufficiently large n.
ER  -