Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 17 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Effects of Uninterrupted and Interrupted Sitting on Central Blood Pressure in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Crossover Trial

  1. 1University of Southampton

Abstract

BACKGROUNDSedentary behaviour independently contributes to cardiovascular disease risk. In healthy adults, prolonged uninterrupted sitting acutely elevates blood pressure, whereas light-activity breaks attenuate this response. Whether such strategies confer similar benefits in high-risk populations, such as chronic stroke survivors, remains unanswered.

OBJECTIVESTo determine whether non-ambulatory, seated heel-raise interruptions every 10 minutes would attenuate central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) during 3 hours of prolonged sitting in individuals with chronic stroke. We hypothesized that the experimental (heel-raise interruption) condition (EXP) would significantly mitigate the cSBPresponse relative to uninterrupted sitting (CON).

METHODSUsing a randomized crossover design, 15 chronic stroke patients (69.3 {+/-} 10.8 y; 10 male) completed two 3-hour conditions: CON and EXP (10 seated bi-lateral heel raises at 1 rep{middle dot}s-{superscript 1} every 10 minutes). Central and peripheral blood pressures were assessed pre- and post-each condition using the SphygmoCor XCEL. Condition x Time interactions were tested using repeated-measures ANOVA.

RESULTSThe primary hypothesis was confirmed: a significant Condition x Time interaction was detected for cSBP (p < 0.05; p{superscript 2} = 0.28), with EXP eliciting a smaller increase than CON (5.6 mmHg [-6.4, 17.6] vs. 9.6 mmHg [-2.4, 21.6]).

CONCLUSIONSHeel-raise interruptions every 10 minutes attenuate the cSBP response to prolonged sitting in chronic stroke patients and reduce cardiac workload. Frequent, non-ambulatory activity breaks represent a practical secondary prevention strategy for this population, though higher intensity or frequency may be required to fully protect vascular function.

Related

  1. Long-Term Effects of Paced Heart Rate on Central Blood Pressure in Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction and Hypertension: A Randomised Crossover Study
    Tuuli Joonsalu, Silver Heinsar, Martin Serg +5
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial Comparing Immediate Effects of Components of Complex Decongestive Therapy in Lower-limb Lymphedema Patients.
    Asako Oka, Tetsuya Tsuji, Kiriko Abe +8
    Progress in rehabilitation medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMC
  3. Effects of liraglutide on blood pressure and renal function in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shengning Gao, Yudong Shan, Dongxue Ma +2
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Innovative application of pressure gradient measurement in internal carotid stenosis in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (NOTICE-CAS): study protocol for a randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial
    Krzysztof Ściborski, Artur Telichowski, Natalia Świątoniowska-Lonc +19
    TrialsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Clinical trials & evidence synthesisCrossref
  5. Acute Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training with Different Loads on Peripheral Muscle Oxygenation Kinetics and Autonomic Response in Patients with COPD: A Protocol for a Randomized Crossover Study.
    Natália Mota da Silva Borges, Patrícia Angélica de Miranda Silva Nogueira, Dyego Tavares de Lima +7
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{faulkner2026effects,
  title = {{Effects of Uninterrupted and Interrupted Sitting on Central Blood Pressure in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Crossover Trial}},
  author = {J. Faulkner and D. Lambrick and S. Fryer and K. Stone and S. Hannah and N. Hudson and L. Stoner and A. Mitchelmore},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.02.26362083},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362083v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Effects of Uninterrupted and Interrupted Sitting on Central Blood Pressure in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Crossover Trial
AU  - J. Faulkner
AU  - D. Lambrick
AU  - S. Fryer
AU  - K. Stone
AU  - S. Hannah
AU  - N. Hudson
AU  - L. Stoner
AU  - A. Mitchelmore
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/02
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.02.26362083
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362083v1
AB  - BACKGROUNDSedentary behaviour independently contributes to cardiovascular disease risk. In healthy adults, prolonged uninterrupted sitting acutely elevates blood pressure, whereas light-activity breaks attenuate this response. Whether such strategies confer similar benefits in high-risk populations, such as chronic stroke survivors, remains unanswered.  OBJECTIVESTo determine whether non-ambulatory, seated heel-raise interruptions every 10 minutes would attenuate central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) during 3 hours of prolonged sitting in individuals with chronic stroke. We hypothesized that the experimental (heel-raise interruption) condition (EXP) would significantly mitigate the cSBPresponse relative to uninterrupted sitting (CON).  METHODSUsing a randomized crossover design, 15 chronic stroke patients (69.3 {+/-} 10.8 y; 10 male) completed two 3-hour conditions: CON and EXP (10 seated bi-lateral heel raises at 1 rep{middle dot}s-{superscript 1} every 10 minutes). Central and peripheral blood pressures were assessed pre- and post-each condition using the SphygmoCor XCEL. Condition x Time interactions were tested using repeated-measures ANOVA.  RESULTSThe primary hypothesis was confirmed: a significant Condition x Time interaction was detected for cSBP (p < 0.05; p{superscript 2} = 0.28), with EXP eliciting a smaller increase than CON (5.6 mmHg [-6.4, 17.6] vs. 9.6 mmHg [-2.4, 21.6]).  CONCLUSIONSHeel-raise interruptions every 10 minutes attenuate the cSBP response to prolonged sitting in chronic stroke patients and reduce cardiac workload. Frequent, non-ambulatory activity breaks represent a practical secondary prevention strategy for this population, though higher intensity or frequency may be required to fully protect vascular function.
ER  -