Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute

Artificial intelligence-driven precision immunogenetics for cancer stem cell-targeted CAR immunotherapy

  1. 1University of Colombo, Institute of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology
  2. 2Department of Biomedical Science, School of Medical Sciences, International Institute of Health Sciences (IIHS – Multiversity)
  3. 3University of Kelaniya, Faculty of Medicine

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a major contributor to therapeutic resistance, tumour recurrence, and disease progression because of their self-renewal capacity, phenotypic plasticity, immune evasion, and ability to persist after treatment. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of several hematological malignancies, but effective targeting of CSC-driven disease, especially solid tumour, remains challenging. Antigen heterogeneity and loss, CSC plasticity, CAR-cell dysfunction, metabolic constraints, and an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME) can limit long-term therapeutic responses. CSC-associated antigens such as CD133, CD44, EpCAM, HER2, CSPG4, ALDH, and EGFRvIII have been investigated as CAR targets, although their heterogeneous and context-dependent expression raises important concerns regarding CSC specificity and on-target/off-tumour toxicity. Artificial intelligence (AI) and computational approaches provide opportunities to integrate genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, spatial, and clinical data for CSC-associated antigen discovery, biomarker identification, CAR design, patient stratification, and toxicity prediction. However, the evidence supporting these applications varies considerably, ranging from computational and preclinical studies to retrospective clinical modelling, while prospective clinical validation of AI-guided CSC-targeted CAR therapy remains limited. Similarly, next-generation platforms, including CAR-natural killer (CAR-NK) cells, CAR-macrophages (CAR-M), gamma-delta CAR-T cells, and CAR-invariant natural killer T (CAR-iNKT) cells, remain at different stages of translational development. This review critically examines CSC biology, mechanisms of resistance to CAR-based therapy, emerging CAR platforms, and the potential role of AI in precision immunogenetics. Particular emphasis is placed on differentiating CSC-intrinsic, CAR-cell-intrinsic, and TME-mediated resistance and on defining the evidence maturity of AI applications. Finally, current challenges in data availability, tumour heterogeneity, model bias, external validation, interpretability, safety, and prospective clinical translation are discussed, together with priorities for developing clinically validated AI-enabled CSC-targeted CAR therapies.

Related

  1. Editorial: Artificial intelligence and anti-cancer drugs: advancing discovery, personalization, and precision oncology
    Mohamed El-Shazly, Neeraj Kumar, Sumit Sheoran
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossref
  2. Toward Precision Colorectal Cancer Screening: Integrating Clinical Risk Stratification, Molecular Biomarkers, and Artificial Intelligence
    Sorinel Lunca, Stefan Morarasu, Gabriel Mihail Dimofte
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Oncologic Imaging: Deep Learning, Radiomics, and Clinical Integration for Precision Cancer Diagnosis
    Ohmini Krishnamurthy Rajendran
    International Journal of Drug Delivery TechnologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text19 citedMedical imaging & radiologyOpenAlex
  4. Clinical Translation of Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Real-World Validation, Workflow Integration, and Precision Medicine Applications
    Ohmini Krishnamurthy Rajendran
    International Journal of Drug Delivery TechnologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text20 citedEpidemiology & public healthOpenAlex
  5. Artificial Intelligence–Driven Multimodal Imaging for Cancer During Pregnancy: Advances in Maternal–Fetal Diagnostics and Precision Oncology
    Ohmini Krishnamurthy Rajendran
    International Journal of Drug Delivery TechnologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text20 citedEpidemiology & public healthOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{abeysuriya2026artificial,
  title = {{Artificial intelligence-driven precision immunogenetics for cancer stem cell-targeted CAR immunotherapy}},
  author = {Visula Abeysuriya and Sachintha N. Alwis and Vasitha Abeysuriya},
  journal = {Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1186/s43046-026-00422-2},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s43046-026-00422-2},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Artificial intelligence-driven precision immunogenetics for cancer stem cell-targeted CAR immunotherapy
AU  - Visula Abeysuriya
AU  - Sachintha N. Alwis
AU  - Vasitha Abeysuriya
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/08
JO  - Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute
DO  - 10.1186/s43046-026-00422-2
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s43046-026-00422-2
AB  - Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a major contributor to therapeutic resistance, tumour recurrence, and disease progression because of their self-renewal capacity, phenotypic plasticity, immune evasion, and ability to persist after treatment. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of several hematological malignancies, but effective targeting of CSC-driven disease, especially solid tumour, remains challenging. Antigen heterogeneity and loss, CSC plasticity, CAR-cell dysfunction, metabolic constraints, and an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME) can limit long-term therapeutic responses. CSC-associated antigens such as CD133, CD44, EpCAM, HER2, CSPG4, ALDH, and EGFRvIII have been investigated as CAR targets, although their heterogeneous and context-dependent expression raises important concerns regarding CSC specificity and on-target/off-tumour toxicity. Artificial intelligence (AI) and computational approaches provide opportunities to integrate genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, spatial, and clinical data for CSC-associated antigen discovery, biomarker identification, CAR design, patient stratification, and toxicity prediction. However, the evidence supporting these applications varies considerably, ranging from computational and preclinical studies to retrospective clinical modelling, while prospective clinical validation of AI-guided CSC-targeted CAR therapy remains limited. Similarly, next-generation platforms, including CAR-natural killer (CAR-NK) cells, CAR-macrophages (CAR-M), gamma-delta CAR-T cells, and CAR-invariant natural killer T (CAR-iNKT) cells, remain at different stages of translational development. This review critically examines CSC biology, mechanisms of resistance to CAR-based therapy, emerging CAR platforms, and the potential role of AI in precision immunogenetics. Particular emphasis is placed on differentiating CSC-intrinsic, CAR-cell-intrinsic, and TME-mediated resistance and on defining the evidence maturity of AI applications. Finally, current challenges in data availability, tumour heterogeneity, model bias, external validation, interpretability, safety, and prospective clinical translation are discussed, together with priorities for developing clinically validated AI-enabled CSC-targeted CAR therapies.
SN  - 2589-0409
SN  - 1110-0362
ER  -