Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 51 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Bayesian Fixed-Confidence Best-Arm Identification with Abstention

Abstract

We study the Bayesian fixed-confidence best-arm identification problem in which a learner can abstain from making a terminal recommendation. Subject to a target error probability δ and an abstention budget α, we propose Screen-and-Confirm (S&C) and analyze its expected stopping time. We further derive the minimum expected stopping time for any algorithm that satisfies these constraints. For Gaussian priors and rewards, as (δ,α)↓(0,0), we establish matching upper and lower bounds up to multiplicative constants, with rate κν2[1+log((α+δ)/δ)]/(α+δ), where κν is the prior density of the top-two gap at zero, highlighting that nearly tied instances govern the sampling cost. When abstention is disallowed (α=0), S&C yields the optimal Θ(1/δ) dependence for fixed model parameters, removing the additional log(1/δ) factor in the upper bound of Jang et al. (2024) under our Gaussian assumptions. We further characterize the exact multiplicative constant of the minimum expected stopping time for practical regimes including (i) fixed α∈ (0,1) and (ii) α/δ→∞, which are also achieved by S&C.

Related

  1. Nearly Optimal Fixed-Confidence Best-Arm Identification with 1-Bit Feedback
    Khang Luong, Dinh Thai Son, Hoang Ta +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Asymptotically Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed-Budget under Differential Privacy
    Keqin Chen, Jie Bian, Yulian Wu +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. FOCUS: Fixed-Confidence Online Causal Learning Using Sequential Adaptive Interventions
    Haijie Xu, Chen Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Cost-Aware Best-LLM Identification using Dueling Feedback
    Sarvesh Gharat, Nikhil Karamchandani, Jayakrishnan Nair
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Tight Sample Complexity Bounds for Entropic Best Policy Identification
    Amer Essakine, Claire Vernade
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{huang2026bayesian,
  title = {{Bayesian Fixed-Confidence Best-Arm Identification with Abstention}},
  author = {Yuqi Huang and Yunlong Hou and Vincent Y. F. Tan},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.30384},
  eprint = {2610.30384},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30384},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Bayesian Fixed-Confidence Best-Arm Identification with Abstention
AU  - Yuqi Huang
AU  - Yunlong Hou
AU  - Vincent Y. F. Tan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.30384
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30384
AB  - We study the Bayesian fixed-confidence best-arm identification problem in which a learner can abstain from making a terminal recommendation. Subject to a target error probability δ and an abstention budget α, we propose Screen-and-Confirm (S&C) and analyze its expected stopping time. We further derive the minimum expected stopping time for any algorithm that satisfies these constraints. For Gaussian priors and rewards, as (δ,α)↓(0,0), we establish matching upper and lower bounds up to multiplicative constants, with rate κ_ν^2[1+log((α+δ)/δ)]/(α+δ), where κ_ν is the prior density of the top-two gap at zero, highlighting that nearly tied instances govern the sampling cost. When abstention is disallowed (α=0), S&C yields the optimal Θ(1/δ) dependence for fixed model parameters, removing the additional log(1/δ) factor in the upper bound of Jang et al. (2024) under our Gaussian assumptions. We further characterize the exact multiplicative constant of the minimum expected stopping time for practical regimes including (i) fixed α∈ (0,1) and (ii) α/δ→∞, which are also achieved by S&C.
ER  -