Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Translational Oncology

Single-cell and bulk transcriptomic analysis of inflammation-metabolism programs and the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis

  1. 1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Maanshan People's Hospital, No. 45, Hubei Road, Maanshan, Anhui, 243000, China
  2. 2Department of General Surgery, Wuhu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, No. 430, Jiuhua South Road, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, China
  3. 3Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Maanshan People's Hospital, No. 45, Hubei Road, Maanshan, Anhui, 243000, China

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is a major cause of mortality in colorectal cancer (CRC) and develops within a heterogeneous tumor microenvironment (TME). How immune, stromal, and metabolic programs differ between primary CRC and matched liver metastases remains incompletely resolved.

Methods: We analyzed publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from GSE178318 (15 specimens from six patients: six primary CRC samples, six matched liver metastases, and three peripheral-blood mononuclear cell samples) together with bulk RNA-seq data from GSE50760 (54 samples from 18 patients spanning normal colon, primary CRC, and liver metastasis). The single-cell workflow included quality control, score-based cell-type annotation, patient-level pseudobulk differential expression, pathway/module scoring, ligand-receptor co-expression analysis, and diffusion-map pseudotime. Bulk data were assessed using within-patient paired comparisons, co-expression analysis, and program-level scoring. Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate (FDR) correction was applied for multiple testing.

Results: After quality control, 132,915 single cells were retained. Liver metastases showed higher patient-level T/NK-cell fractions and lower malignant epithelial and B/plasma-cell fractions than primary tumors. In paired single-cell pseudobulk analysis, no gene remained significant at the prespecified FDR threshold, although nominal differences suggested extracellular-matrix and metabolic changes. Glycolysis scores were modestly higher and oxidative-phosphorylation scores modestly lower in liver metastases, whereas inflammatory and glycolytic scores were not correlated at the patient-tissue level. Ligand-receptor co-expression was strongest for MIF-CD74, VIM-CD44, and HLA-A-CD8A, with CAF/stromal and myeloid/TAM populations showing high aggregate outgoing scores. Diffusion pseudotime showed increasing EMT/invasion scores and decreasing glycolysis along the inferred transcriptomic ordering; this ordering is descriptive and not a longitudinal lineage. In the bulk cohort, 654 genes differed between liver metastasis and primary tumor, while cross-platform rank concordance was weak (Spearman rho=0.106).

Conclusions: Public single-cell and bulk datasets support compartment-associated differences in cellular composition and transcriptional programs in CRLM, with prominent stromal, myeloid, and metabolic features. However, limited patient numbers, cross-sectional sampling, weak cross-platform concordance, and the absence of experimental validation mean that the ligand-receptor and trajectory findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than causal or clinically validated.

Related

  1. Single-cell transcriptomic and immune microenvironment analyses reveal a TIMP1-associated OLFM4⁺ tumor epithelial program linked to colorectal cancer progression and immune evasion.
    Rui Leng, Xi Cui, Xinyu Wu +5
    Translational oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
  2. 1120 Hyperplex spatial profiling of transcriptomic, proteomic, and protein–protein proximity layers for an in-depth characterization of the tumor microenvironment
    Pino Bordignon, Saska Brajkovic, Benjamin Pelz +6
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYMolecular biology & gene regulationDOAJ
  3. Linking systemic inflammation nutrition status to the tumor immune microenvironment: integrated biomarkers of neoadjuvant response in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Licong Shao, Jianting Xu, Xudong Wu +2
    Frontiers in geneticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC
  4. DVT-primed neutrophils reshape the brain microenvironment to promote brain metastasis
    S. Endo, D. Rujchanarong, K. Keeran +17
    bioRxivPreprintCC0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  5. NDFIP2 Suppresses Colorectal Cancer Metastasis Through DDX3X‐Dependent R‐Loop Remodeling and GNG13 Transcriptional Activation
    Enjian Zhang, Yanfang Li, Jiaxin Shu +10
    Advanced SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
BibTeX
@article{ma2026singlecell,
  title = {{Single-cell and bulk transcriptomic analysis of inflammation-metabolism programs and the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis}},
  author = {Zhen Ma and Wen Jiang and Jian Zhang and Lingyu Kong and Conghao Zhao and Fang Ma and Chenliang Wu},
  journal = {Translational Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.tranon.2026.103077},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2026.103077},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Single-cell and bulk transcriptomic analysis of inflammation-metabolism programs and the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis
AU  - Zhen Ma
AU  - Wen Jiang
AU  - Jian Zhang
AU  - Lingyu Kong
AU  - Conghao Zhao
AU  - Fang Ma
AU  - Chenliang Wu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Translational Oncology
DO  - 10.1016/j.tranon.2026.103077
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2026.103077
AB  - Background: Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is a major cause of mortality in colorectal cancer (CRC) and develops within a heterogeneous tumor microenvironment (TME). How immune, stromal, and metabolic programs differ between primary CRC and matched liver metastases remains incompletely resolved.  Methods: We analyzed publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from GSE178318 (15 specimens from six patients: six primary CRC samples, six matched liver metastases, and three peripheral-blood mononuclear cell samples) together with bulk RNA-seq data from GSE50760 (54 samples from 18 patients spanning normal colon, primary CRC, and liver metastasis). The single-cell workflow included quality control, score-based cell-type annotation, patient-level pseudobulk differential expression, pathway/module scoring, ligand-receptor co-expression analysis, and diffusion-map pseudotime. Bulk data were assessed using within-patient paired comparisons, co-expression analysis, and program-level scoring. Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate (FDR) correction was applied for multiple testing.  Results: After quality control, 132,915 single cells were retained. Liver metastases showed higher patient-level T/NK-cell fractions and lower malignant epithelial and B/plasma-cell fractions than primary tumors. In paired single-cell pseudobulk analysis, no gene remained significant at the prespecified FDR threshold, although nominal differences suggested extracellular-matrix and metabolic changes. Glycolysis scores were modestly higher and oxidative-phosphorylation scores modestly lower in liver metastases, whereas inflammatory and glycolytic scores were not correlated at the patient-tissue level. Ligand-receptor co-expression was strongest for MIF-CD74, VIM-CD44, and HLA-A-CD8A, with CAF/stromal and myeloid/TAM populations showing high aggregate outgoing scores. Diffusion pseudotime showed increasing EMT/invasion scores and decreasing glycolysis along the inferred transcriptomic ordering; this ordering is descriptive and not a longitudinal lineage. In the bulk cohort, 654 genes differed between liver metastasis and primary tumor, while cross-platform rank concordance was weak (Spearman rho=0.106).  Conclusions: Public single-cell and bulk datasets support compartment-associated differences in cellular composition and transcriptional programs in CRLM, with prominent stromal, myeloid, and metabolic features. However, limited patient numbers, cross-sectional sampling, weak cross-platform concordance, and the absence of experimental validation mean that the ligand-receptor and trajectory findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than causal or clinically validated.
SN  - 1936-5233
ER  -