Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Fixation Probabilities of Mutant Alleles in an Ecological Context

  1. 1Arizona State University

Abstract

For decades, population geneticists have relied upon a formula derived by Malecot and by Kimura to estimate the fixation probability of mutant alleles (phi). Among other things, this formula leads to the conclusion that in sufficiently large populations phi asymptotically approaches 2s(Ne/N) (for small s), where s is the relative selective advantage of the mutant allele, and Ne and N respectively denote the effective and absolute (haploid) population sizes. In contrast, in sufficiently small populations, phi = 1/N, with the two domains of behavior being separated at the point where s is approximately 1/(2Ne). These results hold when s, N, and Ne remain constant during the fixation process, but require modification when populations are changing in size. Here, we show that if there are ecological effects associated with competing alleles, such that the genetic composition of the population influences the total population size, the fixation probability of a beneficial allele can substantially deviate from the levels suggested above, even in the domain of effective neutrality (i.e., |s| less than 1/(2Ne)). We obtain analytical results for a variety of frequency-dependent functions for the overall population size, and show that the overall effect is largely a function of the response at low mutant-allele frequency. We also derive expressions for times to fixation and for fixation probabilities of deleterious alleles, and show how our results relate to prior work for the situation in which population sizes change in frequency-independent manners.

Related

  1. Wheat cleistogamy is expressed by the dosage effect of homoeologous AP2 mutant alleles carrying a point mutation in the miR172 target site.
    Katsuyuki Kakeda, Agetha Bigie Nanape, Hinako Ogawa +1
    Breeding sciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  2. Multiplayer games on regular graphs under aspiration-driven imitation: Fixation probabilities and the dilution principle
    Dhaker Kroumi
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEvolutionary biologyarXiv
  3. Fluctuation theorems and exact multi-allele fixation probabilities
    Emil A. Yuzbashyan, Alexander Feigel, Alexandre V. Morozov
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textEvolutionary biologyStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  4. Map-based cloning of the susceptibility locus conditioning bs6 resistance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) encoding mutant alleles of pseudokinase proteins.
    Zoltan Toth, Zoltan Gabor Toth, Peter Kalo +2
    TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte GenetikPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  5. Mutant Fixation for a Stochastic Evolutionary Model in Fragmented Populations
    Yi Fu, Natalia L. Komarova
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEvolutionary biologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{joshi2026fixation,
  title = {{Fixation Probabilities of Mutant Alleles in an Ecological Context}},
  author = {K. Joshi and S. Halder and A. G. Casanova and M. Lynch},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.07.20.739501},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.20.739501v2},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Fixation Probabilities of Mutant Alleles in an Ecological Context
AU  - K. Joshi
AU  - S. Halder
AU  - A. G. Casanova
AU  - M. Lynch
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/20
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.07.20.739501
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.20.739501v2
AB  - For decades, population geneticists have relied upon a formula derived by Malecot and by Kimura to estimate the fixation probability of mutant alleles (phi). Among other things, this formula leads to the conclusion that in sufficiently large populations phi asymptotically approaches 2s(Ne/N) (for small s), where s is the relative selective advantage of the mutant allele, and Ne and N respectively denote the effective and absolute (haploid) population sizes. In contrast, in sufficiently small populations, phi = 1/N, with the two domains of behavior being separated at the point where s is approximately 1/(2Ne). These results hold when s, N, and Ne remain constant during the fixation process, but require modification when populations are changing in size. Here, we show that if there are ecological effects associated with competing alleles, such that the genetic composition of the population influences the total population size, the fixation probability of a beneficial allele can substantially deviate from the levels suggested above, even in the domain of effective neutrality (i.e., |s| less than 1/(2Ne)). We obtain analytical results for a variety of frequency-dependent functions for the overall population size, and show that the overall effect is largely a function of the response at low mutant-allele frequency. We also derive expressions for times to fixation and for fixation probabilities of deleterious alleles, and show how our results relate to prior work for the situation in which population sizes change in frequency-independent manners.
ER  -