Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Oncology

Sex-associated differences in initial resection location, margin status, and re-excision in extremity leiomyosarcoma: a retrospective tertiary-center cohort study

  1. 1Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Burn Center, Sarcoma Center, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum
  2. 2Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Hamburg

Abstract

Background: Sex-associated differences in early surgical care may occur within individual sarcoma entities. We examined recorded tumor characteristics, initial resection location, margin status, and re-excision in extremity leiomyosarcoma.

Methods: This exploratory retrospective study included 79 patients with initial resection during 2000–2015 who ultimately received treatment at a tertiary sarcoma center. The primary endpoint was initial R1 versus R0 resection. Analyses used Firth penalized logistic regression and Bayesian marginal standardization; treatment-location, re-excision, and survival analyses were exploratory.

Results: Initial R1 occurred in 34/46 men (73.9%) and 13/29 women (44.8%; absolute difference 29.1 percentage points; P = 0.015). Men more frequently underwent initial outside-center surgery (72.3% vs. 41.4%) and re-excision (82.6% vs. 50.0%). Recorded tumors <5 cm were more frequent in men (64.6% vs. 35.5%). The male-sex odds ratio decreased from 3.41 (95% CI 1.31–9.24) after age and site adjustment to 2.43 (0.82–7.41) after additional size and depth adjustment. The fully standardized difference was 16.6 percentage points (95% credible interval −2.5 to 37.4), compatible with no difference as well as a clinically substantial difference. Among patients with known location and R0/R1 status, R1 occurred after 37/44 outside-center and 9/29 index-center resections. All 47 patients with initial R1 underwent re-excision; definitive R0 was achieved in all 79 patients.

Conclusion: Men in this selected, exploratory cohort had higher observed frequencies of outside-center resection, initial R1, and re-excision. Adjustment attenuated the association, with substantial residual uncertainty. These findings do not establish inequity, differential access, biological causation, or mediation and require prospective multicenter validation.

Related

  1. Adjunctive iliac vein stenting for May-Thurner-associated lower-extremity phlebolymphedema: a dual-center retrospective cohort study
    Yi-Chen Lin, Li-Chuan Shen, Dian-Xi Chen +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Surgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  2. Vascular Invasion and Survival in Extremity Leiomyosarcoma: An Exploratory Single-Center Cohort Study from the Oxford Sarcoma Service.
    Seva N S Gill, Tanjot S Kurala, Serkan Bayram +4
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Age-associated differences in lower-extremity muscle mass, force, and power in older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of sex differences
    Elodie Piche, Raphael Zory, Emeline Michel +3
    BMC GeriatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyHAL
  4. Factors Associated with Adjuvant Radiotherapy Use After Simpson Grade I Resection of WHO Grade 2 Meningioma: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Yasar Unsal, Mehmet Ozgur Ozates, Recai Kulak +2
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Higher intraoperative arterial-to-end-tidal carbon dioxide gradients are associated with postoperative respiratory morbidity after lung cancer resection: a retrospective INSPIRE cohort study
    Long Li, Dan Wang, Qingyi Zhou +1
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{weskamp2026sexassociated,
  title = {{Sex-associated differences in initial resection location, margin status, and re-excision in extremity leiomyosarcoma: a retrospective tertiary-center cohort study}},
  author = {Pia Weskamp and Sonja Verena Schmidt and Marius Drysch and Felix Reinkemeier and Mehran Dadras and Marcus Lehnhardt and Flemming Puscz and Christoph Wallner},
  journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1980400},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1980400/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Sex-associated differences in initial resection location, margin status, and re-excision in extremity leiomyosarcoma: a retrospective tertiary-center cohort study
AU  - Pia Weskamp
AU  - Sonja Verena Schmidt
AU  - Marius Drysch
AU  - Felix Reinkemeier
AU  - Mehran Dadras
AU  - Marcus Lehnhardt
AU  - Flemming Puscz
AU  - Christoph Wallner
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - Frontiers in Oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1980400
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1980400/full
AB  - Background: Sex-associated differences in early surgical care may occur within individual sarcoma entities. We examined recorded tumor characteristics, initial resection location, margin status, and re-excision in extremity leiomyosarcoma.  Methods: This exploratory retrospective study included 79 patients with initial resection during 2000–2015 who ultimately received treatment at a tertiary sarcoma center. The primary endpoint was initial R1 versus R0 resection. Analyses used Firth penalized logistic regression and Bayesian marginal standardization; treatment-location, re-excision, and survival analyses were exploratory.  Results: Initial R1 occurred in 34/46 men (73.9%) and 13/29 women (44.8%; absolute difference 29.1 percentage points; P = 0.015). Men more frequently underwent initial outside-center surgery (72.3% vs. 41.4%) and re-excision (82.6% vs. 50.0%). Recorded tumors <5 cm were more frequent in men (64.6% vs. 35.5%). The male-sex odds ratio decreased from 3.41 (95% CI 1.31–9.24) after age and site adjustment to 2.43 (0.82–7.41) after additional size and depth adjustment. The fully standardized difference was 16.6 percentage points (95% credible interval −2.5 to 37.4), compatible with no difference as well as a clinically substantial difference. Among patients with known location and R0/R1 status, R1 occurred after 37/44 outside-center and 9/29 index-center resections. All 47 patients with initial R1 underwent re-excision; definitive R0 was achieved in all 79 patients.  Conclusion: Men in this selected, exploratory cohort had higher observed frequencies of outside-center resection, initial R1, and re-excision. Adjustment attenuated the association, with substantial residual uncertainty. These findings do not establish inequity, differential access, biological causation, or mediation and require prospective multicenter validation.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -