Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo

Ω₀ Relational Generative Dynamics Finite Propagation, Self-Limiting Organization, State-Dependent Condensation, and Recursive Structural Generation

  1. 1Independent Researcher, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Can one inherited relational architecture generate qualitatively different regimes of organization without pre-specifying the objects that eventually emerge? This paper was developed specifically as a computational proof module of A2. It tests whether A2’s relational generation can survive a sequence of increasingly demanding dynamical requirements using a two-way strategy: reverse inference from established physical and systems-level phenomena to necessary constraints, followed by forward simulation under explicit controls, ablations and retained failures. Across a sequence of models, compatibility increases relational organization, cumulative history increases persistence, local accessibility produces a finite distance-ordered response front, and self-limitation suppresses unrestricted system-size scaling while exposing a failure of durable structure identity. A reality-informed extension with internal orientation, signed coupling, joint relational state, and state-dependent effective coupling produces rapid relational activation and a global condensation regime. A further multi-source model with stochastic local shocks and finite stress/recovery converts an otherwise nearly locked condensed state into an actively reorganizing regime with repeated observer-detected birth, fusion, fission, and transformation of relational components. The contribution is therefore not a single successful simulation, but a progressively constrained generative route in which both success and failure reduce the admissible mechanism space. We formulate recursive reification Γ_n→X_(n+1), generative-source multiplication, and k-order closure as the next falsifiable tests. The present results do not identify physical particles or cosmological events; they establish that a compact relational architecture can already support organization, finite propagation, explosive condensation, and shock-driven structural transformation within one inherited computational program.

Related

  1. Patronin condensation integrates recognition, protection and organization of microtubule minus ends
    B. Zhang, J. Yang, S. Yu +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textCell biologybioRxiv
  2. Causal Propagation, Persistent Relational Structure and Emergent Dynamics: An Integrated Physical Bridge in the Ω₀/A2 Framework
    Yanghua Wang
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Zenodo
  3. Electroconvergence: The Epistemological Link between Chaos and the Relational Referent of Organization
    Dumitru Crivoi
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  4. From Relational Source Organization to Schwarzschild Geometry and Geodesics EAS/Scalar Fields — Paper II: Isolated-Source Gravitational Correspondence
    0009-0008-0231-7067 Michael E. Labhard\
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  5. EAS / Scalar Fields: Quantum Gravity: Relational Scale, Conditioned-Region Source Organization, and Qualified Correspondence to General Relativity
    0009-0008-0231-7067 Michael E. Labhard\
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026ω₀,
  title = {{Ω₀ Relational Generative Dynamics Finite Propagation, Self-Limiting Organization, State-Dependent Condensation, and Recursive Structural Generation}},
  author = {Yanghua Wang},
  howpublished = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23472403},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23472403},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Ω₀ Relational Generative Dynamics Finite Propagation, Self-Limiting Organization, State-Dependent Condensation, and Recursive Structural Generation
AU  - Yanghua Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - Zenodo
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.23472403
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/23472403
AB  - Can one inherited relational architecture generate qualitatively different regimes of organization without pre-specifying the objects that eventually emerge? This paper was developed specifically as a computational proof module of A2. It tests whether A2’s relational generation can survive a sequence of increasingly demanding dynamical requirements using a two-way strategy: reverse inference from established physical and systems-level phenomena to necessary constraints, followed by forward simulation under explicit controls, ablations and retained failures. Across a sequence of models, compatibility increases relational organization, cumulative history increases persistence, local accessibility produces a finite distance-ordered response front, and self-limitation suppresses unrestricted system-size scaling while exposing a failure of durable structure identity. A reality-informed extension with internal orientation, signed coupling, joint relational state, and state-dependent effective coupling produces rapid relational activation and a global condensation regime. A further multi-source model with stochastic local shocks and finite stress/recovery converts an otherwise nearly locked condensed state into an actively reorganizing regime with repeated observer-detected birth, fusion, fission, and transformation of relational components. The contribution is therefore not a single successful simulation, but a progressively constrained generative route in which both success and failure reduce the admissible mechanism space. We formulate recursive reification Γ_n→X_(n+1), generative-source multiplication, and k-order closure as the next falsifiable tests. The present results do not identify physical particles or cosmological events; they establish that a compact relational architecture can already support organization, finite propagation, explosive condensation, and shock-driven structural transformation within one inherited computational program.
ER  -