What difference do cash transfers make? Understanding impacts and mechanisms from cash transfer recipients and communities in Malawi and Lesotho.
Abstract
Cash transfers are a common poverty alleviation intervention, yet qualitative reports of recipients’ lived experiences are limited. Without these perspectives, policy frameworks risk reducing beneficiaries to passive inputs in programmatic equations. This means potentially overlooking the social meanings, moral negotiations, and relational dynamics through which transfers are actually received, used, perceived, and redistributed. To address this gap, we analyzed 74 in-depth interviews with cash transfer recipients and their household members in rural Malawi and Lesotho. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we created four themes: 1) “With my poverty it can’t work”: Enough to survive, not enough to change, 2) “I can’t be eating in my house while my children are hungry next door”: Grandmothers and the obligation to share, 3) “I am already worried as to what I will be doing”: Psychological relief and stress intertwine, 4) “Sky-falling” and “satanic” money: Notions of deservingness produce stigma and jealousy. Recipients consistently noted improvement in food security, while effects on mental health and social relationships were more mixed. We argue that recipient-centered reports complement and strengthen quantitative evidence about the impacts and mechanisms of cash transfers. We discuss specific policy recommendations, such as larger and more predictable payments, better communication, and sensitive disbursement options, gender-sensitive support, and more active monitoring of psychosocial and community effects in order to mitigate potential negative impacts. Finally, we argue there is a need for a more ambitious focus on development as the key path to poverty eradication.
Related
- Exploring the biogeographical patterns and driving mechanisms of microbial communities in four microhabitats of Zostera japonica beds
- Integrating physiological and proteomics signatures for understanding drought, salinity and alkalinity stress tolerance mechanisms in lentil
- Generalized modeling reveals stabilizing mechanisms in cross-feeding microbial communities
- Community Assembly Mechanisms Facilitate Understanding of Microbial Responses to Habitat Transition along a Spatial Environmental Continuum in Alpine Plateaus
- The trade-off between parsimony and model complexity for understanding biomedical mechanisms from mathematical models
BibTeX
@misc{zaneva2026what,
title = {{What difference do cash transfers make? Understanding impacts and mechanisms from cash transfer recipients and communities in Malawi and Lesotho.}},
author = {Mirela Zaneva and Josphine Hapazari and Theodora Khofi and Christopher James Graham and Eunbi Han and Shruti and Aswathi Surendran and Rizwana Amin and Roseline Dzekem Dine and Hangala Siachiwena},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/3fq7c_v3},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/3fq7c_v3/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - What difference do cash transfers make? Understanding impacts and mechanisms from cash transfer recipients and communities in Malawi and Lesotho.
AU - Mirela Zaneva
AU - Josphine Hapazari
AU - Theodora Khofi
AU - Christopher James Graham
AU - Eunbi Han
AU - Shruti
AU - Aswathi Surendran
AU - Rizwana Amin
AU - Roseline Dzekem Dine
AU - Hangala Siachiwena
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/31
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/3fq7c_v3
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/3fq7c_v3/
AB - Cash transfers are a common poverty alleviation intervention, yet qualitative reports of recipients’ lived experiences are limited. Without these perspectives, policy frameworks risk reducing beneficiaries to passive inputs in programmatic equations. This means potentially overlooking the social meanings, moral negotiations, and relational dynamics through which transfers are actually received, used, perceived, and redistributed. To address this gap, we analyzed 74 in-depth interviews with cash transfer recipients and their household members in rural Malawi and Lesotho. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we created four themes: 1) “With my poverty it can’t work”: Enough to survive, not enough to change, 2) “I can’t be eating in my house while my children are hungry next door”: Grandmothers and the obligation to share, 3) “I am already worried as to what I will be doing”: Psychological relief and stress intertwine, 4) “Sky-falling” and “satanic” money: Notions of deservingness produce stigma and jealousy. Recipients consistently noted improvement in food security, while effects on mental health and social relationships were more mixed. We argue that recipient-centered reports complement and strengthen quantitative evidence about the impacts and mechanisms of cash transfers. We discuss specific policy recommendations, such as larger and more predictable payments, better communication, and sensitive disbursement options, gender-sensitive support, and more active monitoring of psychosocial and community effects in order to mitigate potential negative impacts. Finally, we argue there is a need for a more ambitious focus on development as the key path to poverty eradication.
ER -