Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Accelerated Bregman Proximal Gradient Methods from Dual Geometric Perspectives

Abstract

We study Bregman proximal gradient (BPG) algorithms under relative smoothness for convex, relatively strongly convex, and nonconvex objectives. Existing accelerated BPG algorithms for convex objectives typically require additional assumptions on Bregman divergences, most notably triangle-scaling conditions, which can lead to slower convergence rates. We propose a family of geometry-accelerated BPG algorithms that exploit Bregman geometry in both proximal-gradient and mirror-space updates, without imposing additional geometric conditions such as triangle-scaling conditions. Our methods adapt the stepsizes and mirror-space updates through local backtracking and computable acceptance criteria, without a global relative-smoothness constant as input. We derive convergence bounds in terms of the parameters accepted during the iterations. These bounds yield an Ø(k−2) rate for convex objectives and a linear rate for relatively strongly convex objectives when the geometry-acceleration parameters remain uniformly bounded. For nonconvex objectives, we establish an Ø(k−1) rate for a stationarity measure without requiring a lower Bregman bound or a full-domain Bregman divergence. Numerical experiments on inverse problems, entropy-regularized least squares, D-optimal design, and nonnegative matrix factorization demonstrate faster practical convergence than established Bregman baselines.

Related

  1. On The Linear Convergence of Bregman Proximal Gradient Methods with Applications to Kullback--Leibler regression
    Jonathan Chirinos-Rodríguez, Christian Daniele, Cédric Févotte +1
    HALPreprintLicence not statedOptimisation & controlHAL
  2. Right Bregman proximal gradient with application to Poisson inverse problems
    Thibaut Modrzyk, Elie Bretin, Voichita Maxim
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlHALarXiv
  3. ABrA-GD: Adaptive Bregman Accelerated Gradient Descent for Relatively Smooth and (Strongly-)Convex Optimization
    Damien Scieur
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Composite and Stochastic Smoothed Decentralized Bregman Proximal-Gradient Methods
    Shengze Xu, Chenhan Jin, Qingsong Wang +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Wasserstein accelerated proximal gradient algorithms
    Kansei Ushiyama, Yi Feng, Kaito Fujii +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{yamashita2026accelerated,
  title = {{Accelerated Bregman Proximal Gradient Methods from Dual Geometric Perspectives}},
  author = {Yuya Yamashita and Shota Takahashi and Akiko Takeda},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.34773},
  eprint = {2609.34773},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34773},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Accelerated Bregman Proximal Gradient Methods from Dual Geometric Perspectives
AU  - Yuya Yamashita
AU  - Shota Takahashi
AU  - Akiko Takeda
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.34773
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34773
AB  - We study Bregman proximal gradient (BPG) algorithms under relative smoothness for convex, relatively strongly convex, and nonconvex objectives. Existing accelerated BPG algorithms for convex objectives typically require additional assumptions on Bregman divergences, most notably triangle-scaling conditions, which can lead to slower convergence rates. We propose a family of geometry-accelerated BPG algorithms that exploit Bregman geometry in both proximal-gradient and mirror-space updates, without imposing additional geometric conditions such as triangle-scaling conditions. Our methods adapt the stepsizes and mirror-space updates through local backtracking and computable acceptance criteria, without a global relative-smoothness constant as input. We derive convergence bounds in terms of the parameters accepted during the iterations. These bounds yield an Ø(k^−2) rate for convex objectives and a linear rate for relatively strongly convex objectives when the geometry-acceleration parameters remain uniformly bounded. For nonconvex objectives, we establish an Ø(k^−1) rate for a stationarity measure without requiring a lower Bregman bound or a full-domain Bregman divergence. Numerical experiments on inverse problems, entropy-regularized least squares, D-optimal design, and nonnegative matrix factorization demonstrate faster practical convergence than established Bregman baselines.
ER  -