Advancing the service-oriented transition of smart cities: Evaluating the intelligent approval quality
- 1School of Law, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
- 2School of Law, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
Abstract
In the context of smart cities development and digital governance, administrative intelligent approval plays an effective and valuable role in government service transformation. However, the explosive application of technology has led to several challenges of approval quality such as inconsistent with due process, weak error correction mechanism of algorithmic decision-making and lagged supervisory regime, which hinder the service-oriented transformation. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the quality of intelligent approval using rigorous, rational, and universally applicable methods, which may not only enhance the service standards of digital government and advance smart cities development toward maturity, but also contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. In the stage of evaluation indicator system construction, determining first-level indicators including legality, rationality, satisfaction and supervision by Delphi Method. Then the corresponding 10 secondary indicators and 38 tertiary indicators are progressively expanded based on value guidance, institutional norms, literature research and cases. In the stage of applying, Taiyuan in China is taken as the evaluation object and implemented through Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. The evaluation results indicated that although the overall quality shows good, there are several potential and prominent problems, including insufficient specific modes, inaccessible the right to a hearing, inadequate staff service, ineffective public supervision and the lack of transparency, and the targeted strategies are proposed for improving the approval quality. Additionally, future research will establish a dedicated evaluation committee, leverage digital platforms more extensively, and strengthen relevant legislation and theoretical support.
Related
- Student satisfaction-oriented physical education teacher education curriculum: A framework for evaluating implementation effectiveness and optimizing quality
- Evaluating State-Transition Models in Short Resting-State fMRI with Continuous-Dynamics Controls
- Disease-level drug approval forecasting from trial-agnostic public data
- Editorial: Advancing enteric disease treatments: probiotics and antimicrobial strategies
- Editorial: Advancing plant histopathology: unraveling plant-pathogen interactions and disease resistance mechanisms
BibTeX
@article{wang2026advancing,
title = {{Advancing the service-oriented transition of smart cities: Evaluating the intelligent approval quality}},
author = {Jiaqi Wang and Yali Wang},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0354902},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354902},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Advancing the service-oriented transition of smart cities: Evaluating the intelligent approval quality
AU - Jiaqi Wang
AU - Yali Wang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/25
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0354902
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354902
AB - In the context of smart cities development and digital governance, administrative intelligent approval plays an effective and valuable role in government service transformation. However, the explosive application of technology has led to several challenges of approval quality such as inconsistent with due process, weak error correction mechanism of algorithmic decision-making and lagged supervisory regime, which hinder the service-oriented transformation. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the quality of intelligent approval using rigorous, rational, and universally applicable methods, which may not only enhance the service standards of digital government and advance smart cities development toward maturity, but also contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. In the stage of evaluation indicator system construction, determining first-level indicators including legality, rationality, satisfaction and supervision by Delphi Method. Then the corresponding 10 secondary indicators and 38 tertiary indicators are progressively expanded based on value guidance, institutional norms, literature research and cases. In the stage of applying, Taiyuan in China is taken as the evaluation object and implemented through Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. The evaluation results indicated that although the overall quality shows good, there are several potential and prominent problems, including insufficient specific modes, inaccessible the right to a hearing, inadequate staff service, ineffective public supervision and the lack of transparency, and the targeted strategies are proposed for improving the approval quality. Additionally, future research will establish a dedicated evaluation committee, leverage digital platforms more extensively, and strengthen relevant legislation and theoretical support.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -