Four weeks of isometric handgrip training results in lower awake ambulatory blood pressure compared with control: a randomized clinical trial
- 1Institute of Cardiology of Rio Grande do Sul/University Foundation of Cardiology Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
Abstract
We compared the effects of upper‐limb (handgrip) and lower‐limb (knee extension) isometric training on ambulatory blood pressure in individuals with controlled hypertension. In this randomized controlled trial, 67 adults receiving antihypertensive medication were allocated to a control group (CG, n = 22), small muscle mass isometric training (SMM, handgrip; n = 22), or large muscle mass isometric training (LMM, knee extension; n = 23). Participants completed 12 supervised sessions over 4 weeks, with the exercise protocols performed at 30% of upper‐limb MVC or lower‐limb maximal isometric load, respectively. Ambulatory blood pressure outcomes were compared using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), adjusting for the corresponding baseline office blood pressure. Hourly 24‐h profiles were analyzed using generalized estimating equations with Bonferroni‐adjusted post hoc tests. Significant between‐group differences were observed only for awake ambulatory blood pressure. Compared with CG, SMM showed lower awake systolic blood pressure (121.8 ± 3.1 vs. 124.2 ± 2.6 mmHg; p = 0.017) and awake diastolic blood pressure (76.3 ± 3.6 vs. 80.8 ± 4.2 mmHg; p = 0.009). No significant differences were observed between LMM and CG, between the two exercise groups, or for 24‐h and sleep blood pressure. These findings indicate that, after 4 weeks of supervised isometric training, modest between‐group differences in awake ambulatory blood pressure were observed only for handgrip training compared with the control group. Greater muscle mass recruitment did not result in superior antihypertensive effects, suggesting that the chronic blood pressure response to isometric exercise is not determined solely by the amount of muscle mass involved.
Trial registration: “ClinicalTrials.gov,” “NCT07147595.”
Related
- Effects of Dynamic Core Stability Training as an Adjunct to the FIFA 11+ Program on Dynamic Knee Valgus, Single-Leg Athletic Stability, and Isometric Hip Strength in Amateur Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Comparative effects of suspension-based and dynamometer-based isometric training on neuromuscular performance in trained male athletes: a randomized comparative study.
- Sex differences and acute intermittent isometric handgrip exercise effects on microvascular reactivity in young healthy adults.
- Association of 24 h Pulse Pressure Derived from Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring with All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis: A Prospective Cohort Study
- Dose–effect relationship of an acute isometric exercise session with different durations on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in prehypertensive substance use disorder individuals
BibTeX
@article{oliveira2026four,
title = {{Four weeks of isometric handgrip training results in lower awake ambulatory blood pressure compared with control: a randomized clinical trial}},
author = {Patrícia C. Oliveira and Gustavo Waclawovsky and Alexandre M. Lehnen},
journal = {Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1111/cpf.70102},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.70102},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Four weeks of isometric handgrip training results in lower awake ambulatory blood pressure compared with control: a randomized clinical trial
AU - Patrícia C. Oliveira
AU - Gustavo Waclawovsky
AU - Alexandre M. Lehnen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
DO - 10.1111/cpf.70102
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.70102
AB - We compared the effects of upper‐limb (handgrip) and lower‐limb (knee extension) isometric training on ambulatory blood pressure in individuals with controlled hypertension. In this randomized controlled trial, 67 adults receiving antihypertensive medication were allocated to a control group (CG, n = 22), small muscle mass isometric training (SMM, handgrip; n = 22), or large muscle mass isometric training (LMM, knee extension; n = 23). Participants completed 12 supervised sessions over 4 weeks, with the exercise protocols performed at 30% of upper‐limb MVC or lower‐limb maximal isometric load, respectively. Ambulatory blood pressure outcomes were compared using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), adjusting for the corresponding baseline office blood pressure. Hourly 24‐h profiles were analyzed using generalized estimating equations with Bonferroni‐adjusted post hoc tests. Significant between‐group differences were observed only for awake ambulatory blood pressure. Compared with CG, SMM showed lower awake systolic blood pressure (121.8 ± 3.1 vs. 124.2 ± 2.6 mmHg; p = 0.017) and awake diastolic blood pressure (76.3 ± 3.6 vs. 80.8 ± 4.2 mmHg; p = 0.009). No significant differences were observed between LMM and CG, between the two exercise groups, or for 24‐h and sleep blood pressure. These findings indicate that, after 4 weeks of supervised isometric training, modest between‐group differences in awake ambulatory blood pressure were observed only for handgrip training compared with the control group. Greater muscle mass recruitment did not result in superior antihypertensive effects, suggesting that the chronic blood pressure response to isometric exercise is not determined solely by the amount of muscle mass involved. Trial registration: “ClinicalTrials.gov,” “NCT07147595.”
SN - 1475-0961
SN - 1475-097X
ER -