Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,788 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Population-scale machine learning models to estimate individual-level risk for acute respiratory infection

5 more authors
  1. 1University of Auckland

Abstract

Summary / AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSModels based on administrative population health records can help improve understanding of disease and hospitalisation risk. This understanding can support evidence-based population health policy and processes. Influenza and other acute respiratory diseases place a large, inequitable burden on the New Zealand population and health care resources. We have developed and evaluated models using retrospective New Zealand hospitalisation records linked to other administrative data.

MethodsWe analysed linked annual records for approximately 4{middle dot}85-5{middle dot}36 million people in 2017-2024. For each year, models were trained to distinguish people who experienced at least one hospitalisation associated with respiratory infectious disease from those without such a hospitalisation during that year. Six algorithms and eight variable sets were assessed using five-fold cross-validation grouped by demographic profile. Variables comprised demographics, continuous hospital-based (M3) and pharmaceutical-based (P3) morbidity indices, and influenza vaccination status. Models trained on one year were also evaluated on data from the following year. Performance measures were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the average precision score (APS). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) described model contributions, including paired vaccination-input changes in 2024.

FindingsAnnual national hospitalisation prevalence ranged from 1{middle dot}01% to 1{middle dot}60%. With all variables, mean cross-validation AUROC and APS were 0{middle dot}8430 and 0{middle dot}1283 for LightGBM (LGB), and 0{middle dot}8415 and 0{middle dot}1285 for XGBoost (XGB). Adding both morbidity indices to the demographics increased LGB APS from 0{middle dot}0720 to 0{middle dot}1158; adding vaccination further increased it to 0{middle dot}1283. Next-year AUROC and APS averaged 0{middle dot}8429 and 0{middle dot}1267 for LGB and 0{middle dot}8423 and 0{middle dot}1277 for XGB. Age and morbidity were the most influential variables. Among vaccinated individuals, SHAP analysis indicated that vaccination contributed most strongly towards lower model-estimated hospitalisation risk in the oldest age group.

InterpretationCombining historical morbidity and vaccination information in gradient boosting models improved the ability to distinguish between people who experienced respiratory hospitalisation and those who did not in annual New Zealand population data. Similar next-year performance and interpretable variation across age and morbidity profiles support further development toward practical risk assessment, including calibration and evaluation across population groups.

Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSOur focused narrative review considered population-based respiratory hospitalisation models, respiratory disease burden in New Zealand, and the development of the M3 and P3 morbidity indices. Existing studies include population models for COVID-19 and infant respiratory syncytial virus, risk-factor analyses of broad respiratory admissions, and evidence that hospital and pharmaceutical morbidity measures provide complementary information.

Added value of this studyThis is the first evaluation of national hospitalisation data linked to other national administrative data to model the risk of acute respiratory infection admission across eight annual datasets, comparing six algorithms and eight variable sets. Together with the benchmark results, these findings illustrate how gradient boosting applied to population-scale records can represent and explain combinations of routinely recorded health information.

Implications of all the available evidenceQuantifying historical morbidity and including vaccination information improved respiratory hospitalisation classification, with gradient boosting providing the strongest overall performance. The explanatory analyses further showed that vaccination-related contributions depended on the individuals age and morbidity profile. Representing these clinically plausible patterns supports the use of flexible, non-linear models, such as the tree-based algorithms, and rich population-scale records for developing interpretable respiratory risk assessments. The study establishes a basis for a New Zealand respiratory risk model by identifying effective algorithms and useful combinations of variables.

Related

  1. Sex differences in immune variables and respiratory infection incidence in an athletic population
    Michael Gleeson, NICOLETTE CLAIRE BISHOP, Marta Oliveira +2
    PubMedPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text49 citedPhysiologyOpenAlex
  2. Lymphocyte-predominant inflammation refines lung histopathology scoring in preclinical respiratory viral infection: support from deep learning analysis
    Sang Hyeok Seok, Hyeon Ah Kim, Hyeok-Won An +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossref
  3. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent tuberculosis infection and disease: systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    D. A. Jolliffe, K. Middelkoop, D. Ganmaa +5
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textInfectious diseasemedRxiv
  4. Airway inflammation and upper respiratory tract infection in athletes: is there a link?
    Stéphane Bermon
    PubMedPeer-reviewedLicence not stated82 citedPhysiologyOpenAlex
  5. Lower Respiratory Tract Infection – An Asian Perspective
    Daniel Kwok-Keung Ng
    Pediatric Respirology and Critical Care MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{albrecht2026populationscale,
  title = {{Population-scale machine learning models to estimate individual-level risk for acute respiratory infection}},
  author = {S. Albrecht and E. Smith and H. Y. Yeo and J. Y. Park and A. Gul and I. Hills and J. Hilder and R. Tester and M. David and E. Weiss and E. Wilson and M. Stubbe and S. Marsh and L. Castelino and N. Turner and A. C. Dowell and J. Paynter},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.23.26366351},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.23.26366351v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Population-scale machine learning models to estimate individual-level risk for acute respiratory infection
AU  - S. Albrecht
AU  - E. Smith
AU  - H. Y. Yeo
AU  - J. Y. Park
AU  - A. Gul
AU  - I. Hills
AU  - J. Hilder
AU  - R. Tester
AU  - M. David
AU  - E. Weiss
AU  - E. Wilson
AU  - M. Stubbe
AU  - S. Marsh
AU  - L. Castelino
AU  - N. Turner
AU  - A. C. Dowell
AU  - J. Paynter
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.23.26366351
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.23.26366351v1
AB  - Summary / AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSModels based on administrative population health records can help improve understanding of disease and hospitalisation risk. This understanding can support evidence-based population health policy and processes. Influenza and other acute respiratory diseases place a large, inequitable burden on the New Zealand population and health care resources. We have developed and evaluated models using retrospective New Zealand hospitalisation records linked to other administrative data.  MethodsWe analysed linked annual records for approximately 4{middle dot}85-5{middle dot}36 million people in 2017-2024. For each year, models were trained to distinguish people who experienced at least one hospitalisation associated with respiratory infectious disease from those without such a hospitalisation during that year. Six algorithms and eight variable sets were assessed using five-fold cross-validation grouped by demographic profile. Variables comprised demographics, continuous hospital-based (M3) and pharmaceutical-based (P3) morbidity indices, and influenza vaccination status. Models trained on one year were also evaluated on data from the following year. Performance measures were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the average precision score (APS). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) described model contributions, including paired vaccination-input changes in 2024.  FindingsAnnual national hospitalisation prevalence ranged from 1{middle dot}01% to 1{middle dot}60%. With all variables, mean cross-validation AUROC and APS were 0{middle dot}8430 and 0{middle dot}1283 for LightGBM (LGB), and 0{middle dot}8415 and 0{middle dot}1285 for XGBoost (XGB). Adding both morbidity indices to the demographics increased LGB APS from 0{middle dot}0720 to 0{middle dot}1158; adding vaccination further increased it to 0{middle dot}1283. Next-year AUROC and APS averaged 0{middle dot}8429 and 0{middle dot}1267 for LGB and 0{middle dot}8423 and 0{middle dot}1277 for XGB. Age and morbidity were the most influential variables. Among vaccinated individuals, SHAP analysis indicated that vaccination contributed most strongly towards lower model-estimated hospitalisation risk in the oldest age group.  InterpretationCombining historical morbidity and vaccination information in gradient boosting models improved the ability to distinguish between people who experienced respiratory hospitalisation and those who did not in annual New Zealand population data. Similar next-year performance and interpretable variation across age and morbidity profiles support further development toward practical risk assessment, including calibration and evaluation across population groups.  Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSOur focused narrative review considered population-based respiratory hospitalisation models, respiratory disease burden in New Zealand, and the development of the M3 and P3 morbidity indices. Existing studies include population models for COVID-19 and infant respiratory syncytial virus, risk-factor analyses of broad respiratory admissions, and evidence that hospital and pharmaceutical morbidity measures provide complementary information.  Added value of this studyThis is the first evaluation of national hospitalisation data linked to other national administrative data to model the risk of acute respiratory infection admission across eight annual datasets, comparing six algorithms and eight variable sets. Together with the benchmark results, these findings illustrate how gradient boosting applied to population-scale records can represent and explain combinations of routinely recorded health information.  Implications of all the available evidenceQuantifying historical morbidity and including vaccination information improved respiratory hospitalisation classification, with gradient boosting providing the strongest overall performance. The explanatory analyses further showed that vaccination-related contributions depended on the individuals age and morbidity profile. Representing these clinically plausible patterns supports the use of flexible, non-linear models, such as the tree-based algorithms, and rich population-scale records for developing interpretable respiratory risk assessments. The study establishes a basis for a New Zealand respiratory risk model by identifying effective algorithms and useful combinations of variables.
ER  -