Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Noise-Aware Constitutive Compatibility Atlas for Hyperelastic Material Characterization

  1. 1University of California, Riverside

Abstract

Hyperelastic constitutive characterization is usually posed as selecting the best-fitting model, although several families can reproduce measured loading paths while predicting different responses elsewhere. We developed a noise-aware constitutive-response atlas to determine which families are compatible with an observed response over a prescribed deformation range and within a stated error tolerance. Each family forms a continuous response manifold in a common bounded deformation space, with exact nesting preserved. Standard uniaxial, biaxial, and shear tests are restricted projections of the complete response space, allowing the atlas to identify deformation states that resolve ambiguities left by conventional calibration. The output can contain several families, one family, or none, without forcing a single winner. We constructed the atlas for seven incompressible isotropic hyperelastic families using literature-based parameter ranges. Numerical certification and three controlled tests examined generating-family recovery, separation of responses distinct at the prescribed tolerance, and rejection of a withheld constitutive law. External validation used Treloar rubber and human-brain datasets. For Treloar rubber, uniaxial calibration retained the Mooney-Rivlin and one-term Ogden families; an atlas-selected equibiaxial measurement favored Mooney-Rivlin. For cortex, compression retained the one-term Ogden and second-order Yeoh families; withheld tension and shear favored one-term Ogden. The atlas thus preserves genuine ambiguity, exposes an inadequate candidate library, and identifies when another measurement is needed.

Related

  1. Data-Driven Discovery of a Hyperelastic Strain-Energy Function for Veins Using Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks
    Marisa Bazzi, Divya Adil, Gavin Mays +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBioinformatics & computational biologyBiological & medical physicsarXiv
  2. ProFinder: Candidate constitutive promoter prediction across the bacterial tree for genetic tool development in non-model species
    A. Gautam, J. W. Marsh
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  3. Surfactant Compatibility Screening Improves Formulation Performance of Metarhizium anisopliae for Control of the Tomato Leafminer Phthorimaea absoluta
    Song Mei, Amr Abou El-Ela, Yuanqiu Dong +5
    InsectsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEurope PMC
  4. Compatibility of PVC after irradiation: spectroscopic evaluation
    Samuel Dorey, Fabien Girard, Nathalie Dupuy +3
    European Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Constitutive androgen receptor activity sustains DNA replication programs in triple-negative breast cancer.
    Jing Li, Hongwei Yuan, Kefan Chen +3
    Cell death & diseasePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMCDOAJPMC
BibTeX
@misc{asadi2026noiseaware,
  title = {{Noise-Aware Constitutive Compatibility Atlas for Hyperelastic Material Characterization}},
  author = {A. Asadi and K. Laksari},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.12.758616},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.12.758616v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Noise-Aware Constitutive Compatibility Atlas for Hyperelastic Material Characterization
AU  - A. Asadi
AU  - K. Laksari
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.12.758616
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.12.758616v1
AB  - Hyperelastic constitutive characterization is usually posed as selecting the best-fitting model, although several families can reproduce measured loading paths while predicting different responses elsewhere. We developed a noise-aware constitutive-response atlas to determine which families are compatible with an observed response over a prescribed deformation range and within a stated error tolerance. Each family forms a continuous response manifold in a common bounded deformation space, with exact nesting preserved. Standard uniaxial, biaxial, and shear tests are restricted projections of the complete response space, allowing the atlas to identify deformation states that resolve ambiguities left by conventional calibration. The output can contain several families, one family, or none, without forcing a single winner. We constructed the atlas for seven incompressible isotropic hyperelastic families using literature-based parameter ranges. Numerical certification and three controlled tests examined generating-family recovery, separation of responses distinct at the prescribed tolerance, and rejection of a withheld constitutive law. External validation used Treloar rubber and human-brain datasets. For Treloar rubber, uniaxial calibration retained the Mooney-Rivlin and one-term Ogden families; an atlas-selected equibiaxial measurement favored Mooney-Rivlin. For cortex, compression retained the one-term Ogden and second-order Yeoh families; withheld tension and shear favored one-term Ogden. The atlas thus preserves genuine ambiguity, exposes an inadequate candidate library, and identifies when another measurement is needed.
ER  -