Reliability of retrospective self-report of shift work exposure in a large occupational cohort
Abstract
Objectives: To examine agreement between baseline and retrospective assessments of shift work exposure and test whether this differs in cancer and cardiometabolic disease patients. Methods: A subgroup of the Airwave Health Monitoring study, a cohort of police employees, self-reported shift work status at study entry and retrospectively at follow-up. Agreement statistics were computed overall and stratified by subsequent cancer and cardiometabolic disease status. Adjusted logistic regression tested whether discordant reporting differed by disease status. Results: Overall agreement was 86% (95% CI = 84-88%; {kappa} = 0.72), with no evidence of asymmetric misclassification (McNemar's p = 0.32). Agreement was similar among participants who later developed cancer ({kappa} = 0.76) but lower, although imprecisely estimated, among those who developed cardiometabolic disease ({kappa} = 0.56). Adjusted odds of discordant reporting did not differ significantly by cancer (OR = 0.96, 95% CI= 0.39-2.05) or cardiometabolic disease status (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 0.81-3.87). Conclusions: Retrospective shift work reports showed good overall reliability, with no evidence of asymmetric misclassification, though reliability varied somewhat by disease outcome. These findings provide an empirical basis for future studies using retrospective shift work exposure in the AHMS and similar cohorts.
Related
- Occupational ionizing radiation exposure among medical workers rose during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study
- Acute eosinophilic pneumonia possibly triggered by occupational exposure to zygomycetes: a histologically confirmed case report.
- Vibrio parahaemolyticus bacteremia in decompensated cirrhosis complicated by spontaneous bacterial peritonitis following occupational seafood exposure: A case report.
- Temporal patterns of respiratory rate exposure and mortality in critically ill patients: a retrospective multi-database cohort study
- Cumulative obesity exposure and hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer risk following different weight-loss interventions: retrospective cohort study
BibTeX
@misc{lopezvelasco2026reliability,
title = {{Reliability of retrospective self-report of shift work exposure in a large occupational cohort}},
author = {C. Lopez-Velasco},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.27.26366313},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.26366313v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Reliability of retrospective self-report of shift work exposure in a large occupational cohort
AU - C. Lopez-Velasco
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.27.26366313
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.27.26366313v1
AB - Objectives: To examine agreement between baseline and retrospective assessments of shift work exposure and test whether this differs in cancer and cardiometabolic disease patients. Methods: A subgroup of the Airwave Health Monitoring study, a cohort of police employees, self-reported shift work status at study entry and retrospectively at follow-up. Agreement statistics were computed overall and stratified by subsequent cancer and cardiometabolic disease status. Adjusted logistic regression tested whether discordant reporting differed by disease status. Results: Overall agreement was 86% (95% CI = 84-88%; {kappa} = 0.72), with no evidence of asymmetric misclassification (McNemar's p = 0.32). Agreement was similar among participants who later developed cancer ({kappa} = 0.76) but lower, although imprecisely estimated, among those who developed cardiometabolic disease ({kappa} = 0.56). Adjusted odds of discordant reporting did not differ significantly by cancer (OR = 0.96, 95% CI= 0.39-2.05) or cardiometabolic disease status (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 0.81-3.87). Conclusions: Retrospective shift work reports showed good overall reliability, with no evidence of asymmetric misclassification, though reliability varied somewhat by disease outcome. These findings provide an empirical basis for future studies using retrospective shift work exposure in the AHMS and similar cohorts.
ER -