Emotion-Focused Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment for Adolescents
6 affiliations
- 1Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- 2Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- 3Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego
- 4San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego
- 5Department of Psychiatry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, White Plains, New York
- 6Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Abstract
Importance: Family-based behavioral treatment (FBT) efficacy decreases in adolescence, a developmental period of gradual maturation and increasing autonomy during which emotion regulation skills develop.
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of FBT alone compared with FBT plus emotion regulation across 6 months of treatment and 12 months of follow-up on adolescent weight change, emotion regulation, emotional eating, and parent weight change.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel-group randomized clinical trial of adolescents 13 to 16 years of age with body mass index (BMI) in the 85th percentile or higher but less than the 99.9th percentile was conducted from August 29, 2019, to January 4, 2024, at 2 university clinics. Central randomization was completed by a statistician, and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment condition. The majority of treatments and assessments were delivered remotely via video conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Interventions: FBT plus emotion regulation vs traditional FBT skills alone for weight loss. FBT included nutrition and physical activity education, behavior change strategies, and parenting skills. Both treatments had 6 months of adolescent and parent groups and behavior coaching sessions. The combined group included FBT skills and added dialectical behavior therapy and emotion-focused therapy.
Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were adolescent weight (body mass index [BMI] z score (BMIz) and BMI as a percentage of the 95th BMI percentile [%BMIp95]), emotion regulation skills (measured by Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale [DERS] scores), emotional eating behaviors (measured by Emotional Eating Scale [EES] scores), parent weight, and feasibility and acceptability of treatment. Primary outcome analyses used an intention-to-treat approach.
Results: A total of 166 (FBT plus emotion regulation = 84; FBT = 82) dyads (adolescents: mean [SD] age, 14.3 [1.2] years; 95 [57%] female; mean [SD] BMIz, 2.2 [0.6]; mean [SD] %BMIp95, 120.4 [21.4]; parents: mean [SD] age, 45.3 [6.5] years; 141 [85%] female; mean [SD] BMI, 32.6 [7.0]) were assessed at baseline, midtreatment, posttreatment, and 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. There were no statistically significant differences in posttreatment weight loss among adolescents receiving FBT plus emotion regulation compared with FBT (difference in BMIz, 0.03 [95% CI, −0.05 to 0.10]). However, adolescents in FBT plus emotion regulation did not regain as much weight at the 12-month follow-up (difference in BMIz, −0.09 [95% CI, −0.17 to −0.02]). At the 12-month follow-up, 4% (95% CI, 1%-12%) of adolescents in FBT and 22% (95% CI, 8%-48%) of adolescents in FBT plus emotion regulation lost a clinically significant amount of weight (≥0.20 BMIz). At 12 months’ follow-up, parent weight (difference in BMI, 0.51 [95% CI, −0.03 to 1.05]) and adolescent emotion regulation (difference in DERS scores, −0.06 [95% CI, −0.25 to 0.50]) did not differ by treatment. By contrast, the FBT plus emotion regulation group had lower scores than the FBT group on emotional eating (difference in EES scores, −0.39 [95% CI, −0.63 to −0.15]).
Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of 166 parent-adolescent dyads, adding emotion regulation skills to FBT did not improve weight loss during treatment but was associated with less weight regain and lower emotional eating through the 12-month follow-up. These findings suggest that adding emotion regulation skills to an FBT program may attenuate weight regain and decrease emotional eating among adolescents.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03674944
Related
- Psychophysiological Trajectories of Trauma Recovery: A Process-Oriented Randomized Comparison of Internal Family Systems (IFS) and Emotion-Focused Training for Self-Compassion and Self-Protection (EFT-SCP) in Traumatized Adolescents
- Effects of insomnia-focused psychological and behavioral interventions on depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Motivation in adolescents and caretakers undergoing a weight management program – longitudinal data from the cluster-randomized, motivation-focused STARKIDS trial
- Client Satisfaction with Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Findings from a Series of Statewide Learning Collaboratives
- Comparing the effectiveness of emotion-focused therapy and cognitive rehabilitation based on RehaCom software on emotional and cognitive components in female migraine patients: A randomized control trial.
BibTeX
@article{boutelle2026emotionfocused,
title = {{Emotion-Focused Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment for Adolescents}},
author = {Kerri N. Boutelle and Michael A. Manzano and Ellen K. Pasquale and David R. Strong and Rebecca S. Bernard and Kyung E. Rhee and Dawn M. Eichen and Alec Miller and Carol B. Peterson},
journal = {JAMA Network Open},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39867},
url = {https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2855701},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Emotion-Focused Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment for Adolescents
AU - Kerri N. Boutelle
AU - Michael A. Manzano
AU - Ellen K. Pasquale
AU - David R. Strong
AU - Rebecca S. Bernard
AU - Kyung E. Rhee
AU - Dawn M. Eichen
AU - Alec Miller
AU - Carol B. Peterson
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - JAMA Network Open
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39867
UR - https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2855701
AB - Importance: Family-based behavioral treatment (FBT) efficacy decreases in adolescence, a developmental period of gradual maturation and increasing autonomy during which emotion regulation skills develop. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of FBT alone compared with FBT plus emotion regulation across 6 months of treatment and 12 months of follow-up on adolescent weight change, emotion regulation, emotional eating, and parent weight change. Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel-group randomized clinical trial of adolescents 13 to 16 years of age with body mass index (BMI) in the 85th percentile or higher but less than the 99.9th percentile was conducted from August 29, 2019, to January 4, 2024, at 2 university clinics. Central randomization was completed by a statistician, and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment condition. The majority of treatments and assessments were delivered remotely via video conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Interventions: FBT plus emotion regulation vs traditional FBT skills alone for weight loss. FBT included nutrition and physical activity education, behavior change strategies, and parenting skills. Both treatments had 6 months of adolescent and parent groups and behavior coaching sessions. The combined group included FBT skills and added dialectical behavior therapy and emotion-focused therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were adolescent weight (body mass index [BMI] z score (BMIz) and BMI as a percentage of the 95th BMI percentile [%BMIp95]), emotion regulation skills (measured by Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale [DERS] scores), emotional eating behaviors (measured by Emotional Eating Scale [EES] scores), parent weight, and feasibility and acceptability of treatment. Primary outcome analyses used an intention-to-treat approach. Results: A total of 166 (FBT plus emotion regulation = 84; FBT = 82) dyads (adolescents: mean [SD] age, 14.3 [1.2] years; 95 [57%] female; mean [SD] BMIz, 2.2 [0.6]; mean [SD] %BMIp95, 120.4 [21.4]; parents: mean [SD] age, 45.3 [6.5] years; 141 [85%] female; mean [SD] BMI, 32.6 [7.0]) were assessed at baseline, midtreatment, posttreatment, and 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. There were no statistically significant differences in posttreatment weight loss among adolescents receiving FBT plus emotion regulation compared with FBT (difference in BMIz, 0.03 [95% CI, −0.05 to 0.10]). However, adolescents in FBT plus emotion regulation did not regain as much weight at the 12-month follow-up (difference in BMIz, −0.09 [95% CI, −0.17 to −0.02]). At the 12-month follow-up, 4% (95% CI, 1%-12%) of adolescents in FBT and 22% (95% CI, 8%-48%) of adolescents in FBT plus emotion regulation lost a clinically significant amount of weight (≥0.20 BMIz). At 12 months’ follow-up, parent weight (difference in BMI, 0.51 [95% CI, −0.03 to 1.05]) and adolescent emotion regulation (difference in DERS scores, −0.06 [95% CI, −0.25 to 0.50]) did not differ by treatment. By contrast, the FBT plus emotion regulation group had lower scores than the FBT group on emotional eating (difference in EES scores, −0.39 [95% CI, −0.63 to −0.15]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of 166 parent-adolescent dyads, adding emotion regulation skills to FBT did not improve weight loss during treatment but was associated with less weight regain and lower emotional eating through the 12-month follow-up. These findings suggest that adding emotion regulation skills to an FBT program may attenuate weight regain and decrease emotional eating among adolescents. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03674944
SN - 2574-3805
ER -