Human disturbance and the magnitude and predictability of phenotypic divergence
Abstract
Environmental change can drive phenotypic change within species, but it remains unclear whether such responses produce a general and predictable degree of phenotypic divergence across populations. We conducted a preregistered reanalysis of PROCEED v6.2, comprising 7,186 contrasts from 254 references and 253 species, to test whether the magnitude and predictability of phenotypic divergence differ among disturbance contexts and across temporal, biological, and methodological characteristics of studies. We used ln M to quantify phenotypic differences between paired population samples relative to the variation retained within them and fitted phylogenetic location--scale meta-regressions to model average divergence and residual heterogeneity jointly. Across the dataset, average phenotypic divergence was substantial but did not consistently exceed within-population variation, while total heterogeneity reached 96.6%, providing little support for a universal magnitude of divergence. Disturbance contexts differed more strongly in predictability than in average divergence. Landscape change and introduced populations showed greater divergence than in situ natural variation, while landscape change was also comparatively predictable. By contrast, responses to introduced species consistently showed greater variation among contrasts than most other contexts, whereas the lower predictability of hunting or harvesting and in situ natural variation depended partly on a single large Pacific salmon dataset. Moderator associations should be interpreted cautiously because study characteristics were unevenly represented and partly confounded, and some results were sensitive to robustness analyses. Overall, environmental change can produce substantial phenotypic divergence, but neither its magnitude nor its predictability is uniform across systems. Accounting for heterogeneity therefore reveals when broad comparative responses are likely to generalize and when population-specific evidence is required.
Related
- Subindividual variation in plants: branch-level phenotypic and epigenetic divergence of pollen grains is correlated with the epigenetic divergence of adjacent leaves
- Phenotypic and immunological profile divergence between SLE-associated myelitis and SLE-NMOSD overlap syndrome: a retrospective case series
- Representational continuity through cognitive reconfiguration of magnitude networks in the human brain
- Auditory tracking magnitude, temporal alignment, and anatomical distribution during wakefulness and propofol-based anesthesia in human sEEG
- Early-life cortisol exposure modulates habituation to human disturbance in fallow deer fawns.
BibTeX
@misc{ortega2026human,
title = {{Human disturbance and the magnitude and predictability of phenotypic divergence}},
author = {Santiago Ortega and Eduardo S. A. Santos and Kiyoko Gotanda and Sarah Sanderson and Lucas Damian Gorne and Andrew Hendry and Shinichi Nakagawa},
howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.32942/x2tt3g},
url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15389/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Human disturbance and the magnitude and predictability of phenotypic divergence
AU - Santiago Ortega
AU - Eduardo S. A. Santos
AU - Kiyoko Gotanda
AU - Sarah Sanderson
AU - Lucas Damian Gorne
AU - Andrew Hendry
AU - Shinichi Nakagawa
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
PB - EcoEvoRxiv
DO - 10.32942/x2tt3g
UR - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15389/
AB - Environmental change can drive phenotypic change within species, but it remains unclear whether such responses produce a general and predictable degree of phenotypic divergence across populations. We conducted a preregistered reanalysis of PROCEED v6.2, comprising 7,186 contrasts from 254 references and 253 species, to test whether the magnitude and predictability of phenotypic divergence differ among disturbance contexts and across temporal, biological, and methodological characteristics of studies. We used ln M to quantify phenotypic differences between paired population samples relative to the variation retained within them and fitted phylogenetic location--scale meta-regressions to model average divergence and residual heterogeneity jointly. Across the dataset, average phenotypic divergence was substantial but did not consistently exceed within-population variation, while total heterogeneity reached 96.6%, providing little support for a universal magnitude of divergence. Disturbance contexts differed more strongly in predictability than in average divergence. Landscape change and introduced populations showed greater divergence than in situ natural variation, while landscape change was also comparatively predictable. By contrast, responses to introduced species consistently showed greater variation among contrasts than most other contexts, whereas the lower predictability of hunting or harvesting and in situ natural variation depended partly on a single large Pacific salmon dataset. Moderator associations should be interpreted cautiously because study characteristics were unevenly represented and partly confounded, and some results were sensitive to robustness analyses. Overall, environmental change can produce substantial phenotypic divergence, but neither its magnitude nor its predictability is uniform across systems. Accounting for heterogeneity therefore reveals when broad comparative responses are likely to generalize and when population-specific evidence is required.
ER -