Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma

A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis of musculoskeletal trauma care assessment tools and frameworks in low- and middle-income countries: A narrative review

  • Richard Dimock1
  • Yoshiko Sakuma2,3
  • Elizabeth Tissingh4,5
5 affiliations
  1. 1Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, United Kingdom
  2. 2Department of Infectious Diseases Epidemiology and International Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7 HT, United Kingdom
  3. 3Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
  4. 4King's Global Health Partnerships, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
  5. 5Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, HA7 4LP, United Kingdom
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Musculoskeletal (MSK) trauma is a leading cause of global injury-related mortality and disability, particularly affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite the crucial role of trauma care systems in emergency and surgical care, LMICs face significant challenges in developing robust MSK trauma care. The lack of international consensus on evaluation tools and frameworks hinders practical assessment and improvement. This study aims to review and synthesise current evidence on quality evaluation tools for MSK trauma care in LMICs.

A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Internet databases from 2014 to 2024, employing keywords related to orthopaedics, assessment, tool, framework, and LMICs. The review included all study types addressing MSK trauma care tools/assessments in LMICs. Independent screening was performed with team discussions, and data extraction covered study characteristics and tool specifications. Three reviewers conducted a strengths, weakness, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of identified tools, following stages of familiarisation, theme identification, indexing, charting, and interpretation.

The review identified 26 studies. Key tools include SOSAS, G-TSET, PIPES, INTACT, the WHO Tool for Situational Analysis, Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care, G-MUSC, the Modified Donabedian model, the Four Delays Framework, and WHO Monitoring the building blocks of health systems. A thematic analysis of the SWOT analyses identified five themes for strengths, three for weaknesses, five for opportunities, and three for threats, providing recommendations for future MSK trauma care tools in LMICs.

This review identified tools and frameworks for MSK trauma care in LMICs. SWOT analysis revealed their strengths and weaknesses, highlighting the need for MSK trauma specific tools can support long-term system evaluation, and tailored to the unique challenges in LMICs. Careful consideration is needed to choose the appropriate tool, and developing a specialised evaluation framework is crucial to advance orthopaedic trauma care in these settings.

Related

  1. Evaluation of stakeholder perceptions of a nursing internship program using the CIPP framework: identifying strengths, weaknesses, and perception gaps between students and instructors
    Zohreh Karimiankakolaki, Parvin Mohammadi
    BMC Medical EducationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  2. Treating diagnostic frameworks as information systems: normative implications and opportunities
    Philip Millroth
    Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  3. Diagnostic Methods for Muscle Wasting in COPD: Strengths, Limitations and the Role of Nutritional Assessment
    Roberta Cianci, Domenica Francesca Mariniello, Giuseppe Luciano +8
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Family planning self-care: From global frameworks to local meaning, perceptions, experiences and opportunities in Niger
    Jean Christophe Fotso, Elikem Togo, Dieudonne Bidashimwa +2
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPLOS
  5. Shear-Wave Elastography in Musculoskeletal Pain: Current Evidence and Clinical Applications for Tissue Stiffness Assessment
    Hortensia De la Corte-Rodríguez, Beatriz A. Rodríguez-Damiani, Natalia Pinilla-Téllez +2
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{dimock2026strengths,
  title = {{A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis of musculoskeletal trauma care assessment tools and frameworks in low- and middle-income countries: A narrative review}},
  author = {Richard Dimock and Yoshiko Sakuma and Elizabeth Tissingh},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.jcot.2026.103632},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2026.103632},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis of musculoskeletal trauma care assessment tools and frameworks in low- and middle-income countries: A narrative review
AU  - Richard Dimock
AU  - Yoshiko Sakuma
AU  - Elizabeth Tissingh
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
DO  - 10.1016/j.jcot.2026.103632
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2026.103632
AB  - Musculoskeletal (MSK) trauma is a leading cause of global injury-related mortality and disability, particularly affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite the crucial role of trauma care systems in emergency and surgical care, LMICs face significant challenges in developing robust MSK trauma care. The lack of international consensus on evaluation tools and frameworks hinders practical assessment and improvement. This study aims to review and synthesise current evidence on quality evaluation tools for MSK trauma care in LMICs.  A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Internet databases from 2014 to 2024, employing keywords related to orthopaedics, assessment, tool, framework, and LMICs. The review included all study types addressing MSK trauma care tools/assessments in LMICs. Independent screening was performed with team discussions, and data extraction covered study characteristics and tool specifications. Three reviewers conducted a strengths, weakness, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of identified tools, following stages of familiarisation, theme identification, indexing, charting, and interpretation.  The review identified 26 studies. Key tools include SOSAS, G-TSET, PIPES, INTACT, the WHO Tool for Situational Analysis, Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care, G-MUSC, the Modified Donabedian model, the Four Delays Framework, and WHO Monitoring the building blocks of health systems. A thematic analysis of the SWOT analyses identified five themes for strengths, three for weaknesses, five for opportunities, and three for threats, providing recommendations for future MSK trauma care tools in LMICs.  This review identified tools and frameworks for MSK trauma care in LMICs. SWOT analysis revealed their strengths and weaknesses, highlighting the need for MSK trauma specific tools can support long-term system evaluation, and tailored to the unique challenges in LMICs. Careful consideration is needed to choose the appropriate tool, and developing a specialised evaluation framework is crucial to advance orthopaedic trauma care in these settings.
SN  - 0976-5662
SN  - 2213-3445
ER  -