Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0EarthArXiv

Repeatability-dependent detection thresholds for time-lapse seismic CO₂ monitoring

Abstract

We quantify the smallest CO₂ layer that a time-lapse seismic survey pair can detect as a function of repeatability, measured by the normalized root-mean-square (NRMS) difference, in a Sleipner-like synthetic study. Gassmann fluid substitution under four mixing treatments feeds one-dimensional layer models, checked against two-dimensional finite-difference gathers, and calibrated nonrepeatability sets NRMS from 10% to 60%. Detection is a hypothesis test at a false-alarm probability of 0.05, with 1200 null realizations per frequency and noise level and 40 held-out signal realizations in each of 1728 cells, for four detectors: windowed energy, a clean-template matched filter, a generic-template filter, and a small convolutional neural network (CNN). At 30 Hz, a CO₂ saturation of 0.8, and uniform (Reuss) mixing, the energy detector's minimum detectable thickness rises from the 1-m grid floor at NRMS 10% to 4.5 m at 60%, and Voigt mixing roughly doubles the latter. The energy detector's minimum detectable free-phase mass per area rises over the same range from 25 (a censored grid corner) to 253 kg/m², usually at the lowest saturation tested. At 30 and 45 Hz and NRMS of 40% and above, the energy detector and the CNN increasingly exceed the matched filter's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, consistent with signal misalignment; at 15 Hz the matched filter keeps its advantage. At fixed NRMS, in-window reflectivity and host stiffness move the 30-Hz energy-detector threshold, and a consolidated host suppresses detection. Predictions agree with 11 published Sleipner observables within a factor of 1.41, a consistency check rather than validation. Published Sleipner NRMS of 45%–53% lies near the 50% grid level, where energy-detector, matched-filter, and CNN thresholds span 1.8–3.0 m here and typically 1.8–3.6 m over replicate background draws. A credible detection claim states the repeatability, the false-alarm probability, and the detector together.

Related

  1. Impact of proposed wind turbines on seismic monitoring stations at the Xiaolangdi Reservoir
    Liwei Wei, Cunxiang Cao, Xiaoqing Gan +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyCrossref
  2. Original Insights Into Rock Slope Damage Processes Until Collapse From Passive Seismic Monitoring
    P. Bottelin, L. Baillet
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeophysics & seismologyarXiv
  3. Dense Seismic Array Monitoring of the Glacier Tongue of Isunnguata Sermia, West Greenland
    Nicolas Paris, Florent Gimbert, Tifenn Le Bris +27
    SeismicaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionGeophysics & seismologyHAL
  4. A New Framework for the Detection and Removal of Glitches in InSight Seismic Data
    Andong Lu, Q. M. Li
    Earth and Space SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral earth scienceCrossref
  5. Seismic P-wave attenuation estimation based on frequency-dependent AVO using Kramers-Kronig relations for gas reservoir prediction
    Shengyi Wang, Xuehua Chen, Xingyu Luo +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeophysics & seismologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{falowo2026repeatabilitydependent,
  title = {{Repeatability-dependent detection thresholds for time-lapse seismic CO₂ monitoring}},
  author = {Moses Olanrewaju Falowo},
  howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.31223/x5qr6s},
  url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15925/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Repeatability-dependent detection thresholds for time-lapse seismic CO₂ monitoring
AU  - Moses Olanrewaju Falowo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
PB  - EarthArXiv
DO  - 10.31223/x5qr6s
UR  - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15925/
AB  - We quantify the smallest CO₂ layer that a time-lapse seismic survey pair can detect as a function of repeatability, measured by the normalized root-mean-square (NRMS) difference, in a Sleipner-like synthetic study. Gassmann fluid substitution under four mixing treatments feeds one-dimensional layer models, checked against two-dimensional finite-difference gathers, and calibrated nonrepeatability sets NRMS from 10% to 60%. Detection is a hypothesis test at a false-alarm probability of 0.05, with 1200 null realizations per frequency and noise level and 40 held-out signal realizations in each of 1728 cells, for four detectors: windowed energy, a clean-template matched filter, a generic-template filter, and a small convolutional neural network (CNN). At 30 Hz, a CO₂ saturation of 0.8, and uniform (Reuss) mixing, the energy detector's minimum detectable thickness rises from the 1-m grid floor at NRMS 10% to 4.5 m at 60%, and Voigt mixing roughly doubles the latter. The energy detector's minimum detectable free-phase mass per area rises over the same range from 25 (a censored grid corner) to 253 kg/m², usually at the lowest saturation tested. At 30 and 45 Hz and NRMS of 40% and above, the energy detector and the CNN increasingly exceed the matched filter's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, consistent with signal misalignment; at 15 Hz the matched filter keeps its advantage. At fixed NRMS, in-window reflectivity and host stiffness move the 30-Hz energy-detector threshold, and a consolidated host suppresses detection. Predictions agree with 11 published Sleipner observables within a factor of 1.41, a consistency check rather than validation. Published Sleipner NRMS of 45%–53% lies near the 50% grid level, where energy-detector, matched-filter, and CNN thresholds span 1.8–3.0 m here and typically 1.8–3.6 m over replicate background draws. A credible detection claim states the repeatability, the false-alarm probability, and the detector together.
ER  -