Dynamic backgrounds enhance the confusion effect
- 1School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol 1 , Bristol, UK
- 2School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol 2 , Bristol, UK
Abstract
Natural environments are generally dynamic; examples of background motion include changes in illumination and moving physical features, such as wind-blown foliage or flowing water. Experimental evidence suggests dynamic backgrounds can impede predation by masking the movement of a target, but the interaction between background motion and the movement of prey in groups has not been investigated. Dynamic backgrounds could potentially enhance the confusion effect, the phenomenon whereby locating and/or tracking a single target among similar individuals (‘distractors’) becomes less successful owing to difficulty in discriminating this target from its conspecifics. We investigated whether dynamic backgrounds contribute to the confusion effect by impeding accurate tracking of a target among distractors. We hypothesize that any effect would be greatest when the temporal properties of the background's movement match those of the moving objects. In two experiments, human surrogate ‘predators’ tracked a single target among distractors, moving unpredictably, on backgrounds that drifted coherently in a given direction. Tracking was generally poorer when backgrounds and objects moved at more closely matched speeds, probably owing to temporary masking of prey target movement and subsequent difficulty in re-locating the target among distractors. Our findings identify a role for dynamic backgrounds in defending against predation.
Related
- Beyond snapshots: A dynamic framework for continuous motor unit tracking to enhance neurophysiological assessments
- Resolving the taxonomic confusion between Anthaxia proteus Saunders, 1873 and Anthaxia psittacina Heyden, 1887 (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Buprestinae) through morphological re-examination and molecular analyses
- Cortical substrates of perceptual confusion between pitch and timbre
- Two regions, two lineages: Untangling two centuries of confusion between Machilus glaucescens and M. macranthus (Lauraceae) through integrative taxonomy
- Do divergent mitochondrial backgrounds alter the fate of nuclear alleles during hybridization and admixture?
BibTeX
@article{courtney2026dynamic,
title = {{Dynamic backgrounds enhance the confusion effect}},
author = {Luca C.R. Courtney and Innes C. Cuthill and Ute Leonards and Nicholas E. Scott-Samuel},
journal = {Royal Society Open Science},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1098/rsos.261915},
url = {https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/10/261915/483953/Dynamic-backgrounds-enhance-the-confusion},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Dynamic backgrounds enhance the confusion effect
AU - Luca C.R. Courtney
AU - Innes C. Cuthill
AU - Ute Leonards
AU - Nicholas E. Scott-Samuel
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - Royal Society Open Science
DO - 10.1098/rsos.261915
UR - https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/10/261915/483953/Dynamic-backgrounds-enhance-the-confusion
AB - Natural environments are generally dynamic; examples of background motion include changes in illumination and moving physical features, such as wind-blown foliage or flowing water. Experimental evidence suggests dynamic backgrounds can impede predation by masking the movement of a target, but the interaction between background motion and the movement of prey in groups has not been investigated. Dynamic backgrounds could potentially enhance the confusion effect, the phenomenon whereby locating and/or tracking a single target among similar individuals (‘distractors’) becomes less successful owing to difficulty in discriminating this target from its conspecifics. We investigated whether dynamic backgrounds contribute to the confusion effect by impeding accurate tracking of a target among distractors. We hypothesize that any effect would be greatest when the temporal properties of the background's movement match those of the moving objects. In two experiments, human surrogate ‘predators’ tracked a single target among distractors, moving unpredictably, on backgrounds that drifted coherently in a given direction. Tracking was generally poorer when backgrounds and objects moved at more closely matched speeds, probably owing to temporary masking of prey target movement and subsequent difficulty in re-locating the target among distractors. Our findings identify a role for dynamic backgrounds in defending against predation.
SN - 2054-5703
ER -