Preliminary Evidence Suggests the Transcriptomic Response of Tricolored Bats to White‐Nose Syndrome Is Similar but Not Identical to That of Little Brown Bats
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA
- 2Institute for Interdisciplinary Data Sciences University of Idaho Moscow Idaho USA
- 3Department of Biological Sciences University of Massachusetts Lowell Massachusetts USA
- 4Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of California Santa Cruz Santa Cruz California USA
Abstract
Understanding the pathophysiology of emerging wildlife diseases can inform treatment, improve the projections of long‐term population trajectories, and reveal variation in population‐level impacts among species. Research on white‐nose syndrome (WNS) in hibernating North American bats has largely focused on a single highly susceptible species, the little brown bat ( Myotis lucifugus ). Another susceptible species, the tricolored bat ( Perimyotis subflavus ), has experienced population declines comparable to or greater than those of little brown bats but remains understudied. In particular, the immune response of tricolored bats to WNS has not previously been evaluated. Here, we conduct a preliminary analysis comparing part of the transcriptomic response of tricolored bats to WNS with the little brown bat response. We analyzed 14 tricolored and 13 little brown bat samples collected from Colossal Cave, Kentucky, USA in 2017, where WNS has been present since 2013. We also included 26 little brown bat samples collected from a nearby hibernation site in 1999, prior to WNS emergence. Lacking a proper pre‐WNS control for tricolored bats, we conducted pairwise differential expression analyses between the three sample groups and evaluated the overlap between results to infer part of the tricolored bat response to WNS. These initial results suggested that tricolored bats exhibited differential expression patterns characteristic of susceptible species, including large changes in gene expression still apparent at the end of the hibernation season. Differentially expressed genes were associated with immune, metabolic, and circadian functions, broadly resembling the response observed in little brown bats. However, there was variation in the specific genes involved between the two species. Overall, tricolored bats appear to mount a pronounced immune response to WNS that is similar, but not identical, to that of little brown bats.
Related
- Field-Zone-Associated Transcriptomic and Metabolic Divergence Despite Nearly Identical Observed Chlorophyll in an Agrivoltaic Tea Setting
- TXN/TXNIP signatures point to plasma cells as a potential immune hub in periodontitis based on integrated transcriptomic analysis and preliminary experimental validation
- Molecular basis of anti-CD36 alloimmunization: transcriptomic evidence linking intronic splice-site mutations to CD36 loss-of-function
- Cognitive effects of untreated unilateral and bilateral hearing loss in midlife: Preliminary evidence
- Refined anatomy-based fitting reduces interaural place mismatch and improves speech outcomes, with preliminary evidence for reduced listening effort
BibTeX
@article{kwait2026preliminary,
title = {{Preliminary Evidence Suggests the Transcriptomic Response of Tricolored Bats to White‐Nose Syndrome Is Similar but Not Identical to That of Little Brown Bats}},
author = {Robert E. Kwait and Evan A. Eskew and Maanasvi Balasubramanian and Sarah A. Gignoux‐Wolfsohn and Malin L. Pinsky and Brooke Maslo},
journal = {Ecology and Evolution},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1002/ece3.74588},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.74588},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Preliminary Evidence Suggests the Transcriptomic Response of Tricolored Bats to White‐Nose Syndrome Is Similar but Not Identical to That of Little Brown Bats
AU - Robert E. Kwait
AU - Evan A. Eskew
AU - Maanasvi Balasubramanian
AU - Sarah A. Gignoux‐Wolfsohn
AU - Malin L. Pinsky
AU - Brooke Maslo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - Ecology and Evolution
DO - 10.1002/ece3.74588
UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.74588
AB - Understanding the pathophysiology of emerging wildlife diseases can inform treatment, improve the projections of long‐term population trajectories, and reveal variation in population‐level impacts among species. Research on white‐nose syndrome (WNS) in hibernating North American bats has largely focused on a single highly susceptible species, the little brown bat ( Myotis lucifugus ). Another susceptible species, the tricolored bat ( Perimyotis subflavus ), has experienced population declines comparable to or greater than those of little brown bats but remains understudied. In particular, the immune response of tricolored bats to WNS has not previously been evaluated. Here, we conduct a preliminary analysis comparing part of the transcriptomic response of tricolored bats to WNS with the little brown bat response. We analyzed 14 tricolored and 13 little brown bat samples collected from Colossal Cave, Kentucky, USA in 2017, where WNS has been present since 2013. We also included 26 little brown bat samples collected from a nearby hibernation site in 1999, prior to WNS emergence. Lacking a proper pre‐WNS control for tricolored bats, we conducted pairwise differential expression analyses between the three sample groups and evaluated the overlap between results to infer part of the tricolored bat response to WNS. These initial results suggested that tricolored bats exhibited differential expression patterns characteristic of susceptible species, including large changes in gene expression still apparent at the end of the hibernation season. Differentially expressed genes were associated with immune, metabolic, and circadian functions, broadly resembling the response observed in little brown bats. However, there was variation in the specific genes involved between the two species. Overall, tricolored bats appear to mount a pronounced immune response to WNS that is similar, but not identical, to that of little brown bats.
SN - 2045-7758
SN - 2045-7758
ER -