Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Can radon help to improve methane emission estimates? Results from a dual-tracer inversion

  1. 1Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (Jena, Germany)

Abstract

A major source of uncertainty in inverse modelling of greenhouse gas emissions are deficits in atmospheric transport models, in particular in the description of vertical mixing within the planetary boundary layer (PBL). The properties of radon-222 (Rn) makes it a suitable natural tracer for vertical mixing in the PBL. When comparing the CH ₄ model-data mismatch (MDM), i.e. the differences between the observed and modelled CH ₄ concentrations, with the MDM of Rn, we found substantial correlations for several observation sites in central Europe in 2021 (the median CH ₄ -Rn MDM correlation coefficient is 0.6), indicating that a large part of the CH ₄ and Rn MDM variability can be explained by common errors in the simulated (vertical) transport. We aim to exploit this information in a joint inversion for CH ₄ and Rn by taking into account prior uncertainties and making use of the fact that the transport model error is correlated between the two gases. We use simultaneous CH ₄ and Rn observations from 17 sites across central Europe in 2021. The dual-tracer CH ₄ -Rn inversion yields lower CH ₄ fluxes in several countries covered by the observation sites compared to a single-tracer CH ₄ -only inversion without Rn information. The differences in country-total CH ₄ fluxes between the dual-tracer and single-tracer inversions are on the order of a few percent and depend on the assumed uncertainty for the Rn prior fluxes. These findings underscore the importance of accurate Rn flux maps for fully leveraging the dual-tracer approach and enhancing the reliability of CH ₄ flux estimates.

Versions

Related

  1. Strategic design of methane observation networks to improve emission estimates: A case study in Africa
    Hui Li, Philippe Ciais, Frédéric Chevallier +11
    Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Applying satellite observations to improve bottom-up national emission inventories for methane: application to Colombia
    Sarah E. Hancock, Daniel J. Jacob, Rodrigo Jiménez +17
    Atmospheric chemistry and physicsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text6 citedClimate scienceOpenAlex
  3. Investigating variability and uncertainty in upstream methane emissions intensity estimates of Western Canadian oil and gas production
    Julia Yuan, Martin Lavoie, David Risk +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
  4. Joint Estimation of the Global Facility-Scale Oil–Gas Methane Emission Rate Distribution and Survey-Mode Detection Probabilities from Multiple Satellite Systems
    Dylan Jervis, Jean-Philippe W. MacLean, Jason McKeever +2
    Environmental Science & TechnologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text5 citedClimate scienceOpenAlex
  5. U.S. oil and gas methane emission intensity declined 2019–2024 with little indication of federal policy impact
    Ao Chen, William S. Daniels, Ziting Huang +11
    Communications Earth & EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
BibTeX
@article{maier2026radon,
  title = {{Can radon help to improve methane emission estimates? Results from a dual-tracer inversion}},
  author = {Fabian Maier and Christian Rödenbeck and Ute Karstens and Frank-Thomas Koch and Maksym Gachkivskyi and Andrew Smerald and Christoph Gerbig},
  journal = {Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5194/acp-26-14699-2026},
  url = {https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14699/2026/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Can radon help to improve methane emission estimates? Results from a dual-tracer inversion
AU  - Fabian Maier
AU  - Christian Rödenbeck
AU  - Ute Karstens
AU  - Frank-Thomas Koch
AU  - Maksym Gachkivskyi
AU  - Andrew Smerald
AU  - Christoph Gerbig
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
DO  - 10.5194/acp-26-14699-2026
UR  - https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14699/2026/
AB  - A major source of uncertainty in inverse modelling of greenhouse gas emissions are deficits in atmospheric transport models, in particular in the description of vertical mixing within the planetary boundary layer (PBL). The properties of radon-222 (Rn) makes it a suitable natural tracer for vertical mixing in the PBL. When comparing the CH ₄ model-data mismatch (MDM), i.e. the differences between the observed and modelled CH ₄ concentrations, with the MDM of Rn, we found substantial correlations for several observation sites in central Europe in 2021 (the median CH ₄ -Rn MDM correlation coefficient is 0.6), indicating that a large part of the CH ₄ and Rn MDM variability can be explained by common errors in the simulated (vertical) transport. We aim to exploit this information in a joint inversion for CH ₄ and Rn by taking into account prior uncertainties and making use of the fact that the transport model error is correlated between the two gases. We use simultaneous CH ₄ and Rn observations from 17 sites across central Europe in 2021. The dual-tracer CH ₄ -Rn inversion yields lower CH ₄ fluxes in several countries covered by the observation sites compared to a single-tracer CH ₄ -only inversion without Rn information. The differences in country-total CH ₄ fluxes between the dual-tracer and single-tracer inversions are on the order of a few percent and depend on the assumed uncertainty for the Rn prior fluxes. These findings underscore the importance of accurate Rn flux maps for fully leveraging the dual-tracer approach and enhancing the reliability of CH ₄ flux estimates.
SN  - 1680-7324
ER  -