Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in artificial intelligence

A machine learning framework for stage-structured predator–prey systems with fear effect: Sparse Identification, Gaussian Process Regression, and bifurcation analysis

  1. 1Department of Mathematics, Vellore Institute of Technology , , ,

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive machine learning framework for the analysis of a stage-structured predator–prey system incorporating the fear effect, intra-specific competition among juvenile predators, and maturation delay. The three-species model, comprising prey (N), juvenile predators (P1), and mature predators (P2), is governed by a non-linear ordinary differential equation system in which the prey growth rate is modulated by a fear factor 1/(1+kP2). We first establish the existence and local stability of the coexistence equilibrium E* = (16.02, 16.09, 32.19) and rigorously identify a supercritical Hopf bifurcation at a critical fear intensity kcrit ≈ 0.067, beyond which the equilibrium becomes unstable and a stable limit cycle emerges. Five machine learning methods are deployed and benchmarked: (i) Sparse Identification of Non-linear Dynamics (SINDy) with a generic polynomial library, which recovers the predator equations exactly (R2 = 1.0) and approximates the prey equation (R2 = 0.9997); (ii) Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD), whose linear assumption yields poor reconstruction (R2 = −2.885 for P2), demonstrating the inadequacy of linear methods for this non-linear system; (iii) Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) with a periodic–RBF composite kernel, achieving RMSE values of 1.92, 1.03, and 0.84 from sparse noisy observations; (iv) a physics-constrained function approximation for recovering population trajectories from incomplete data; and (v) a polynomial surrogate ODE model for derivative field approximation. Additionally, the effect of maturation delay τ on system stability is examined through delay differential equation analysis with a fourth-order Runge–Kutta integrator, revealing delay-induced destabilization and transitions to limit cycle dynamics at τ ≥ 10. All numerical results are independently verified and all performance metrics are computed from actual analyses. The framework provides a rigorous, reproducible methodology for applying modern data-driven methods to stage-structured ecological models.

Related

  1. Improving MASLD Identification in Patients with T2D: A Computable Phenotype Framework Integrating Structured Data and Clinical Notes
    Y. Chen, A. Sharma, Q. Yang +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  2. A Carriage-Structured Model of Meningococcal Meningitis: Backward Bifurcation, Seasonal Recurrence, and the Reach of Conjugate-Vaccine Strategies in the African Meningitis Belt.
    Siphokazi Princess Gatyeni
    Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  3. Teacher-student-machine interaction autonomous learning: a structured LLM-integrated framework for developing independent clinical reasoning in residency training.
    Pengru Wang, He Li, Dingyuan Tu +7
    BMC medical educationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  4. A Seven-Step Framework for Structured ChatGPT-Assisted Pharmacology Learning: Educational Outcomes and Attitudes Toward Hypothetical AI-Informed Patients.
    Jelena Roganović, Igor Končar, Milena Barać
    ScientificaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Explainable computational framework for subtype classification and biomarker identification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using machine learning
    Anagha Rajan, Christopher Leela Biji, Mangalam Goutam Sinha +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationBioinformatics & computational biologyPLOSPMC
BibTeX
@article{ramraj2026machine,
  title = {{A machine learning framework for stage-structured predator–prey systems with fear effect: Sparse Identification, Gaussian Process Regression, and bifurcation analysis}},
  author = {G. Ramraj and T. Poornima},
  journal = {Frontiers in artificial intelligence},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/frai.2026.1887024},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719457},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A machine learning framework for stage-structured predator–prey systems with fear effect: Sparse Identification, Gaussian Process Regression, and bifurcation analysis
AU  - G. Ramraj
AU  - T. Poornima
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
JO  - Frontiers in artificial intelligence
DO  - 10.3389/frai.2026.1887024
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13719457
AB  - This paper presents a comprehensive machine learning framework for the analysis of a stage-structured predator–prey system incorporating the fear effect, intra-specific competition among juvenile predators, and maturation delay. The three-species model, comprising prey (N), juvenile predators (P1), and mature predators (P2), is governed by a non-linear ordinary differential equation system in which the prey growth rate is modulated by a fear factor 1/(1+kP2). We first establish the existence and local stability of the coexistence equilibrium E* = (16.02, 16.09, 32.19) and rigorously identify a supercritical Hopf bifurcation at a critical fear intensity kcrit ≈ 0.067, beyond which the equilibrium becomes unstable and a stable limit cycle emerges. Five machine learning methods are deployed and benchmarked: (i) Sparse Identification of Non-linear Dynamics (SINDy) with a generic polynomial library, which recovers the predator equations exactly (R2 = 1.0) and approximates the prey equation (R2 = 0.9997); (ii) Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD), whose linear assumption yields poor reconstruction (R2 = −2.885 for P2), demonstrating the inadequacy of linear methods for this non-linear system; (iii) Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) with a periodic–RBF composite kernel, achieving RMSE values of 1.92, 1.03, and 0.84 from sparse noisy observations; (iv) a physics-constrained function approximation for recovering population trajectories from incomplete data; and (v) a polynomial surrogate ODE model for derivative field approximation. Additionally, the effect of maturation delay τ on system stability is examined through delay differential equation analysis with a fourth-order Runge–Kutta integrator, revealing delay-induced destabilization and transitions to limit cycle dynamics at τ ≥ 10. All numerical results are independently verified and all performance metrics are computed from actual analyses. The framework provides a rigorous, reproducible methodology for applying modern data-driven methods to stage-structured ecological models.
SN  - 2624-8212
ER  -