Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Beyond the glass: testing visitor effects on the behavior of captive teleost fish in public aquaria

  1. 1ENES Bioacoustics Research Lab, CRNL, University of Saint-Etienne, CNRS UMR 5292, Inserm UMR-S 1028, Saint-Etienne, France ; MARE Marine and Environmental Scien

Abstract

Zoos and public aquariums serve as essential hubs for wildlife conservation, public education, and scientific research; however, the success of these missions depends upon maintaining high animal welfare standards despite constant human presence. A primary concern is the 'visitor effect': the modification of animal behavior due to human presence. While this phenomenon is well-documented in captive mammals and has been explored in Chondrichthyans, it remains largely unexamined in teleost fish, despite evidence of their sensitivity to human stimuli in natural environments. This study addresses this knowledge gap by investigating the behavioral responses of 13 teleost species to varying levels of visitor density, direct human solicitations, and ambient noise. Our multivariate analysis reveals that the total number of visitors present in the aquarium and the direct sonic human solicitations (such as knocking on the glass) are significant drivers of behavioral changes. We observed high inter-taxonomic variability: while Euxiphipops sextriatus, Dascyllus aruanus, Zebrasoma flavescens, Chaetodontoplus mesoleucus and Pygoplites diacanthus showed marked sensitivity through significant modifications in their behaviors the others (Amphiprion percula, Chaetodon rafflesia, Chromis viridis, Chrysiptera parasema, Heniochus chrysostomus, and Lactoria cornuta) showed no obvious behavioral changes. Furthermore, acoustic analysis indicates a complex soundscape where global visitor density correlates with increased sound amplitude, particularly in the 100 Hz to 400 Hz range, a critical band for teleost hearing, suggesting that visitor-induced noise is distinct from the aquarium's technical background noise (pumps, aerator etc). These findings underscore that the 'visitor effect' is not a uniform phenomenon but a complex interaction shaped by species-specific sensitivity and distinct anthropogenic actions. Our results highlight the necessity of incorporating species-specific behavioral data and acoustic monitoring into welfare management protocols to better mitigate the impact of human presence on captive fish populations.

Related

  1. An Assessment of Floral Visitor Diversity and Visitation Patterns Associated with Bauhinia variegata L. in a Semi-Urban South African Environment
    Usia Matsila, Mokgaetji Georginah Mokganya
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  2. Floral scents of deceptive Arum maculatum L. (Araceae) shape a taxonomically diverse visitor community of lesser dung flies (Sphaeroceridae) that affects its reproductive success
    Danae Laina, Eva Gfrerer-Burgschwaiger, Jindřich Roháček +5
    Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEcologyZoology & animal behaviourHAL
  3. Complete ammonia-oxidizing Nitrospira and ammonia-oxidizing archaea as biological supplements for freshwater aquaria
    A. K. Umbach, O. Ikert, B. Choquet +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  4. Testing the theory of planned behavior in predicting evacuation intentions during storms
    Amer Hamad Issa Abukhalaf, Abdallah Y Naser
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceAtmospheric science & meteorologyPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  5. Piloting floral-visitor assemblages: Camera-based monitoring in the cliff-dwelling Eastern Alpine endemic Physoplexis comosa (Campanulaceae)
    K. Iberl, P. Kirschner, A. Koc +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEcologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{vincent2026beyond,
  title = {{Beyond the glass: testing visitor effects on the behavior of captive teleost fish in public aquaria}},
  author = {L. Vincent and T. Turco and J. Mourin and J. Attia and A.-S. Tribot},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.17.752300},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.752300v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Beyond the glass: testing visitor effects on the behavior of captive teleost fish in public aquaria
AU  - L. Vincent
AU  - T. Turco
AU  - J. Mourin
AU  - J. Attia
AU  - A.-S. Tribot
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.17.752300
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.17.752300v1
AB  - Zoos and public aquariums serve as essential hubs for wildlife conservation, public education, and scientific research; however, the success of these missions depends upon maintaining high animal welfare standards despite constant human presence. A primary concern is the 'visitor effect': the modification of animal behavior due to human presence. While this phenomenon is well-documented in captive mammals and has been explored in Chondrichthyans, it remains largely unexamined in teleost fish, despite evidence of their sensitivity to human stimuli in natural environments. This study addresses this knowledge gap by investigating the behavioral responses of 13 teleost species to varying levels of visitor density, direct human solicitations, and ambient noise. Our multivariate analysis reveals that the total number of visitors present in the aquarium and the direct sonic human solicitations (such as knocking on the glass) are significant drivers of behavioral changes. We observed high inter-taxonomic variability: while Euxiphipops sextriatus, Dascyllus aruanus, Zebrasoma flavescens, Chaetodontoplus mesoleucus and Pygoplites diacanthus showed marked sensitivity through significant modifications in their behaviors the others (Amphiprion percula, Chaetodon rafflesia, Chromis viridis, Chrysiptera parasema, Heniochus chrysostomus, and Lactoria cornuta) showed no obvious behavioral changes. Furthermore, acoustic analysis indicates a complex soundscape where global visitor density correlates with increased sound amplitude, particularly in the 100 Hz to 400 Hz range, a critical band for teleost hearing, suggesting that visitor-induced noise is distinct from the aquarium's technical background noise (pumps, aerator etc). These findings underscore that the 'visitor effect' is not a uniform phenomenon but a complex interaction shaped by species-specific sensitivity and distinct anthropogenic actions. Our results highlight the necessity of incorporating species-specific behavioral data and acoustic monitoring into welfare management protocols to better mitigate the impact of human presence on captive fish populations.
ER  -