Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJMIR formative research

Artificial Intelligence Use Among Health Care Professionals in the United States and United Kingdom: Cross-National Survey.

  • Emre Sezgin1,2
  • Jennifer Lee1,3
  • Tomasz Jadczyk4,5
  • Alysha J Taxter1,3
5 affiliations
  1. 1College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43205, United States.
  2. 2Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, United States, 1 6146957499.
  3. 3Division of Clinical Informatics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.
  4. 43rd Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Silesia, Poland.
  5. 5Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Unlabelled

This cross-sectional study examined AI use among 524 health care professionals in the United States and United Kingdom, focusing on current applications, access, barriers, and factors that could support adoption. AI use was common but varied across professional and national contexts, with findings highlighting the importance of evidence, organizational guidance, training, privacy safeguards, and integration into clinical workflows for responsible adoption.

Related

  1. Mental Health and Addiction Care Professionals' Views on Artificial Intelligence Integration in Oman: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.
    Khalood Rashid Al-Abri, Amal Ali Al Saadi, Alzahraa Yasir Al Rashdi +4
    Nursing openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  2. Predictors of Intentions to Learn and Adopt Medical Artificial Intelligence Among Healthcare Professionals in Ghana: A Descriptive Cross‐Sectional Study
    Godwin Adzakpah, Daniel Kwame Kwansah Quansah, Mavis Puopelle Dakorah +10
    Health science reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Willing everywhere but in health: a within-person national survey of artificial intelligence acceptance among 11 013 Nigerian adults
    S. I. Abanni, U. Agbo, M. Y. Sulaiman +7
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  4. Integration of artificial intelligence in clinical practice – Insights from a modified Delphi study with human factors experts and healthcare professionals
    Katharina Wenderott, Jim Krups, Matthias Weigl +1
    Human Factors in HealthcarePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  5. Kaiser Permanente National Cross-Vendor Validation of Mammography Artificial Intelligence Computer-Aided Diagnosis Algorithms in a US-Representative Population
    V. Arasu, T. Gadgil, M. Westley +7
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMedical imaging & radiologymedRxiv

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{sezgin2026artificial,
  title = {{Artificial Intelligence Use Among Health Care Professionals in the United States and United Kingdom: Cross-National Survey.}},
  author = {Emre Sezgin and Jennifer Lee and Tomasz Jadczyk and Alysha J Taxter},
  journal = {JMIR formative research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2196/100681},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42896135},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Artificial Intelligence Use Among Health Care Professionals in the United States and United Kingdom: Cross-National Survey.
AU  - Emre Sezgin
AU  - Jennifer Lee
AU  - Tomasz Jadczyk
AU  - Alysha J Taxter
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
JO  - JMIR formative research
DO  - 10.2196/100681
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42896135
AB  - Unlabelled  This cross-sectional study examined AI use among 524 health care professionals in the United States and United Kingdom, focusing on current applications, access, barriers, and factors that could support adoption. AI use was common but varied across professional and national contexts, with findings highlighting the importance of evidence, organizational guidance, training, privacy safeguards, and integration into clinical workflows for responsible adoption.
SN  - 2561-326X
ER  -