Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Sampling Allocation of LinUCB: Optimal Design Limits in the Small-Gap Regime

Abstract

We study the sampling allocation of LinUCB in the small-gap regime, where the reward gaps are of order at most n−1/2 over the decision horizon n. This scaling captures the hard instances underlying worst-case regret lower bounds, for which LinUCB is known to be near optimal up to logarithmic factors in n. Using a mean-field perspective, we characterize this allocation through the empirical sampling distribution, a macroscopic object that averages the effect of adaptive decisions over the horizon, and identify its limit as n→∞. We establish that in this regime, the empirical sampling distribution induced by LinUCB converges to the set of D-optimal designs. This central result reveals that, in the small-gap regime, LinUCB not only achieves near optimal minimax regret but also allocates samples in a way that is asymptotically efficient for learning the reward parameter, thereby connecting regret-driven online learning with information-efficient experimental design. Building on the optimal design limit, we obtain two useful consequences. First, we refine the asymptotic regret analysis of LinUCB in the small-gap regime by characterizing its leading-order constant in the limit. Second, we show that, despite LinUCB's adaptive sampling strategy, the regularized least-squares estimator satisfies a central-limit-type theorem in the small-gap regime, thereby enabling valid statistical inference for the reward parameter.

Related

  1. Optimal sampling density design for homotopic off-the-grid deconvolution
    Joseph Gabet, Maxime Ferreira Da Costa, Kiryung Lee
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingOptimisation & controlHAL
  2. Optimal Dynamic Resource Allocation for Multicore Real-time Systems
    Georgiy A. Bondar, Abigail Eisenklam, Ripon C. Sarker +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Optimal Allocation and Volume under Surface
    Kai Feng, Han Hong, Jessie Li +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Randomized Adaptive Sequential Allocation and the Limits of Bounded Exposure to Inferior Treatments
    Sampurna Kundu, Monitirtha Dey, Atanu Biswas
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Error analysis and optimal sample allocation for randomized unbiased estimation: the single term estimator
    Jiayu He, Chao Zheng
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{liu2026sampling,
  title = {{Sampling Allocation of LinUCB: Optimal Design Limits in the Small-Gap Regime}},
  author = {Yujie Liu and Vincent Y. F. Tan and Yunbei Xu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.06213},
  eprint = {2610.06213},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06213},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sampling Allocation of LinUCB: Optimal Design Limits in the Small-Gap Regime
AU  - Yujie Liu
AU  - Vincent Y. F. Tan
AU  - Yunbei Xu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.06213
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06213
AB  - We study the sampling allocation of LinUCB in the small-gap regime, where the reward gaps are of order at most n^−1/2 over the decision horizon n. This scaling captures the hard instances underlying worst-case regret lower bounds, for which LinUCB is known to be near optimal up to logarithmic factors in n. Using a mean-field perspective, we characterize this allocation through the empirical sampling distribution, a macroscopic object that averages the effect of adaptive decisions over the horizon, and identify its limit as n→∞. We establish that in this regime, the empirical sampling distribution induced by LinUCB converges to the set of D-optimal designs. This central result reveals that, in the small-gap regime, LinUCB not only achieves near optimal minimax regret but also allocates samples in a way that is asymptotically efficient for learning the reward parameter, thereby connecting regret-driven online learning with information-efficient experimental design. Building on the optimal design limit, we obtain two useful consequences. First, we refine the asymptotic regret analysis of LinUCB in the small-gap regime by characterizing its leading-order constant in the limit. Second, we show that, despite LinUCB's adaptive sampling strategy, the regularized least-squares estimator satisfies a central-limit-type theorem in the small-gap regime, thereby enabling valid statistical inference for the reward parameter.
ER  -