Weathering the Ballot Box: Climate Disasters Response and Electoral Behavior in Colombia
Abstract
Do voters hold politicians accountable for climate-related disasters? Existing research offers competing explanations: some argue that voters punish incumbents for poor disaster management, others emphasize the electoral rewards of effective relief, and still others highlight contextual conditions—such as disaster timing and intensity—that moderate these effects. This paper develops and tests a conditional accountability framework that integrates these perspectives, arguing that the political consequences of disasters depend jointly on disaster exposure and the credibility of government response. Using a novel dataset of over 47,000 climate-related disasters in Colombia (1998–2021), linked to municipality-level presidential election results, I estimate fixed-effects models capturing within-municipality and within-cycle variation in disaster exposure and relief. The results show that disasters generally reduce incumbent vote share when they are severe or occur close to elections, but that timely and visible relief can partially offset these effects. These findings unify competing theories of disaster politics and show how accountability under climate stress depends on the interaction between citizen evaluation and government strategy.
Related
- Functional response, numerical response, mutual interference and switching behavior of the predatory mite Euseius scutalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) fed on Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)
- Echoes of Thought: Task Complexity, Inner Speech Analogs, and Prompt Design Shape LLMs’ Response Behavior in the Two-Step Task
- Sustained Activation of a Defensive Behavior-Related Circuit Elicits a distinct Homeostatic Sleep Response
- Exploring piling behavior in aviary-housed laying hens in response to age, management practices, and social influences
- Enhanced weathering of glacial rock flour drives coupled inorganic and organic carbon sequestration in a five-year field experiment
BibTeX
@misc{gelvez2026weathering,
title = {{Weathering the Ballot Box: Climate Disasters Response and Electoral Behavior in Colombia}},
author = {Juan David Gelvez},
howpublished = {OSF Preprints},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31219/osf.io/nfgmd_v3},
url = {https://osf.io/nfgmd_v3/},
note = {CC0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Weathering the Ballot Box: Climate Disasters Response and Electoral Behavior in Colombia
AU - Juan David Gelvez
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/08
PB - OSF Preprints
DO - 10.31219/osf.io/nfgmd_v3
UR - https://osf.io/nfgmd_v3/
AB - Do voters hold politicians accountable for climate-related disasters? Existing research offers competing explanations: some argue that voters punish incumbents for poor disaster management, others emphasize the electoral rewards of effective relief, and still others highlight contextual conditions—such as disaster timing and intensity—that moderate these effects. This paper develops and tests a conditional accountability framework that integrates these perspectives, arguing that the political consequences of disasters depend jointly on disaster exposure and the credibility of government response. Using a novel dataset of over 47,000 climate-related disasters in Colombia (1998–2021), linked to municipality-level presidential election results, I estimate fixed-effects models capturing within-municipality and within-cycle variation in disaster exposure and relief. The results show that disasters generally reduce incumbent vote share when they are severe or occur close to elections, but that timely and visible relief can partially offset these effects. These findings unify competing theories of disaster politics and show how accountability under climate stress depends on the interaction between citizen evaluation and government strategy.
ER -