Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS Global Public Health

Prospective economic evaluation of a predictive artificial intelligence model for sepsis: Effects on hospital costs and return on investment

7 affiliations
  1. 1Multidisciplary Sepsis Unit, Son Llatzer Hospital, Palma, Spain
  2. 2Multidisciplinary Sepsis Group, Health Research Intitute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Palma, Spain
  3. 3University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain
  4. 4Fundación Código Sepsis, Valencia, Spain
  5. 5Faculty of Medicine, Finis Terrae University, Santiago, Chile
  6. 6Critical Care Center, Clínica Las Condes Hospital, Santiago, Chile
  7. 7BiometricsAI, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Early sepsis detection is essential for improving outcomes and reducing costs, but traditional rule-based systems have limited accuracy and real-world evidence for machine-learning alternatives remains scarce. In this context, BIAlert-Sepsis predicts sepsis risk within 24 hours using historical hospital data, and evaluating its implementation in a tertiary hospital setting provides an opportunity to quantify its clinical benefits and economic value. We conducted a retrospective quasi-experimental before–after study including all septic patients admitted from January 2011 to June 2024. The baseline period (Jan 2011 – Mar 2019) was compared with the AI implementation period (Apr 2019 – June 2024), excluding the COVID-19 interval. Outcomes were assessed using adjusted generalized linear models and interrupted time series regression. A hospital-perspective economic evaluation incorporated implementation and maintenance costs, and a 5-year model estimated net benefit and return on investment (ROI), supported by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A total of 8,039 patients were included (6,168 baseline period; 1,871 AI period). Demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable across periods. During the AI period, ICU admissions decreased from 34.4% to 30.4% (adjusted p = 0.001), accompanied by significant reductions of 0.35 ICU days and 0.59 ward days per patient. Mean admission costs declined from 26,517€ to 24,630€ (adjusted p = 0.005). After covariate adjustment, AI implementation was associated with a 26.1–31.1% reduction in mean admission costs across GLM models. Interrupted time series analysis identified a modest immediate cost level change after AI implementation and a larger sustained decline during the post-COVID period. The 5-year economic model projected a cumulative discounted net benefit of 3.55M€ and a 528% ROI. BIAlert-Sepsis was associated with favourable clinical outcomes and lower costs, with economic modelling suggesting early breakeven and positive financial returns. Author summary: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition in which early detection is critical to improving survival and reducing healthcare costs. However, traditional rule-based screening systems often fail to identify high-risk patients early enough. AI offers a promising way to support earlier and more accurate detection.

Related

  1. On the variability of generative artificial intelligence methods in conceptual modeling: an experimental evaluation on combining causal maps
    Noé Y. Flandre, Cédric Daumas, Philippe J. Giabbanelli
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyGeneral mathematicsPLOSPMC
  2. Robust Design and Evaluation of Predictive Algorithms under Unobserved Confounding
    Ashesh Rambachan, Amanda Coston, Edward H. Kennedy
    The Review of Economics and StatisticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text29 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  3. Causal Inference with Generative Artificial Intelligence: Application to Texts as Treatments
    Kosuke Imai, Kentaro Nakamura
    Journal of the American Statistical AssociationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text26 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  4. The Akaike Information Criterion and Artificial Intelligence
    Hendrik Schäbe
    Reliability: Theory & ApplicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textStatisticsDOAJ
  5. Correctness and Predictive Uncertainty in Bayesian TSK Fuzzy Regression: A Reproducible Evaluation on Tabular and Building-Meter Data
    Zhiren Xiao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{giglio2026prospective,
  title = {{Prospective economic evaluation of a predictive artificial intelligence model for sepsis: Effects on hospital costs and return on investment}},
  author = {Andres Giglio and Eric Macias-Fassio and Santiago Salas-Sosa and David Lopez and Cristina Pruenza and Aythami Morales and Marcio Borges-Sa},
  journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0006059},
  url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006059},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Prospective economic evaluation of a predictive artificial intelligence model for sepsis: Effects on hospital costs and return on investment
AU  - Andres Giglio
AU  - Eric Macias-Fassio
AU  - Santiago Salas-Sosa
AU  - David Lopez
AU  - Cristina Pruenza
AU  - Aythami Morales
AU  - Marcio Borges-Sa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/31
JO  - PLOS Global Public Health
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006059
UR  - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006059
AB  - Early sepsis detection is essential for improving outcomes and reducing costs, but traditional rule-based systems have limited accuracy and real-world evidence for machine-learning alternatives remains scarce. In this context, BIAlert-Sepsis predicts sepsis risk within 24 hours using historical hospital data, and evaluating its implementation in a tertiary hospital setting provides an opportunity to quantify its clinical benefits and economic value. We conducted a retrospective quasi-experimental before–after study including all septic patients admitted from January 2011 to June 2024. The baseline period (Jan 2011 – Mar 2019) was compared with the AI implementation period (Apr 2019 – June 2024), excluding the COVID-19 interval. Outcomes were assessed using adjusted generalized linear models and interrupted time series regression. A hospital-perspective economic evaluation incorporated implementation and maintenance costs, and a 5-year model estimated net benefit and return on investment (ROI), supported by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A total of 8,039 patients were included (6,168 baseline period; 1,871 AI period). Demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable across periods. During the AI period, ICU admissions decreased from 34.4% to 30.4% (adjusted p = 0.001), accompanied by significant reductions of 0.35 ICU days and 0.59 ward days per patient. Mean admission costs declined from 26,517€ to 24,630€ (adjusted p = 0.005). After covariate adjustment, AI implementation was associated with a 26.1–31.1% reduction in mean admission costs across GLM models. Interrupted time series analysis identified a modest immediate cost level change after AI implementation and a larger sustained decline during the post-COVID period. The 5-year economic model projected a cumulative discounted net benefit of 3.55M€ and a 528% ROI. BIAlert-Sepsis was associated with favourable clinical outcomes and lower costs, with economic modelling suggesting early breakeven and positive financial returns. Author summary: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition in which early detection is critical to improving survival and reducing healthcare costs. However, traditional rule-based screening systems often fail to identify high-risk patients early enough. AI offers a promising way to support earlier and more accurate detection.
SN  - 2767-3375
ER  -