Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)

Structured reporting of diagnostic hysteroscopy findings in women with reproductive disorders: an ESGE–ESHRE–IFFS international consensus†ǂ

23 more authors

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: How should the findings of diagnostic hysteroscopy in women with reproductive disorders be reported?

SUMMARY ANSWER: This collaborative document by the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the ESHRE, and the International Federation of Fertility Societies (IFFS) provides the first detailed structured reporting template for diagnostic hysteroscopy findings in women with reproductive disorders.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Despite its widespread use in women with reproductive disorders, no standardized framework currently exists for reporting of hysteroscopic findings. This lack of uniformity may limit the utility of the procedure and contribute to substantial heterogeneity among operators and centers. As a result, the reproducibility of hysteroscopy is limited, making it difficult to conduct robust studies that define its prognostic value in specific patient subgroups.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A dedicated working group from ESGE, ESHRE, and IFFS collaborated to develop a consensus for comprehensive structured reporting of diagnostic hysteroscopy findings in women with reproductive problems.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This consensus paper focuses on grouping diagnostic hysteroscopic findings, structuring their reporting, and adopting standardized terminology for women with reproductive disorders. The virtual Nominal Group Technique, a structured consensus-building method, was adopted to ensure equal contribution from all members in the development of the final consensus.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The document provides a structured reporting of hysteroscopic findings into five sections, each systematically capturing patient characteristics, procedural findings, and pathological observations as follows: patient’s characteristics, and findings from the vagina, cervix, uterine cavity, endometrium, and tubal ostia.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The inclusion of a finding in this structured report is not a proof of its clinical significance, but it could be used as a validation tool for further research.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The standardized reporting of hysteroscopic findings promotes consistent data collection across centers and could help inform research and exchange of clinical experience, enhancing the value of hysteroscopy in fertility evaluation.

FUNDING: No external funding was received for the development of the consensus process or manuscript preparation.

DISCLOSURES: All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Related

  1. The Role of Hysteroscopy in Reproductive Medicine and Subfertility: A Critical Narrative Review
    Orestis Tsonis, Ioannis Paschopoulos, Kasmiria Ioanna Paschopoulou +3
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Chronic Retained Products of Conception Masked by Müllerian Duct Anomaly: The Diagnostic Value of Hysteroscopy
    Prashant Suryarao, Komal Chaudhary
    Annals of African MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  3. Risk-based pathology reporting after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal cancer: international consensus standards
    Kareem Khalaf, Huaqi Li, Mai Iwaya +47
    GutPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral biologyGeneral medicineHAL
  4. Reporting Completeness of Biliary Atresia Organoid Studies: A Scoping Review and Structured Audit
    Guantong Li, Dayan Sun, Dingding Wang +7
    Journal of Clinical and Translational HepatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Sex and disease differences in patients’ diagnostic experiences in autoimmune diseases: an international cross-sectional study
    Melanie Sloan, Sydnae Taylor, Benjamin Cox +8
    eClinicalMedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{catena2026structured,
  title = {{Structured reporting of diagnostic hysteroscopy findings in women with reproductive disorders: an ESGE–ESHRE–IFFS international consensus†ǂ}},
  author = {U Catena and U Catena and G Grimbizis and A Arena and R Campo and C De Angelis and A Di Spiezio Sardo and A Feki and H Fernandez and M Horton and E Mocanu and L A Pacheco and G Pados and A Vereczkey and S Saravelos and A Vitagliano and M Acién and L Gianaroli and U Catena and G Grimbizis and A Arena and R Campo and C De Angelis and A Di Spiezio Sardo and A Feki and H Fernandez and M Horton and E Mocanu and L A Pacheco and G Pados and A Vereczkey and S Saravelos and A Vitagliano and M Acién and L Gianaroli},
  journal = {Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/humrep/deag143},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deag143},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Structured reporting of diagnostic hysteroscopy findings in women with reproductive disorders: an ESGE–ESHRE–IFFS international consensus†ǂ
AU  - U Catena
AU  - U Catena
AU  - G Grimbizis
AU  - A Arena
AU  - R Campo
AU  - C De Angelis
AU  - A Di Spiezio Sardo
AU  - A Feki
AU  - H Fernandez
AU  - M Horton
AU  - E Mocanu
AU  - L A Pacheco
AU  - G Pados
AU  - A Vereczkey
AU  - S Saravelos
AU  - A Vitagliano
AU  - M Acién
AU  - L Gianaroli
AU  - U Catena
AU  - G Grimbizis
AU  - A Arena
AU  - R Campo
AU  - C De Angelis
AU  - A Di Spiezio Sardo
AU  - A Feki
AU  - H Fernandez
AU  - M Horton
AU  - E Mocanu
AU  - L A Pacheco
AU  - G Pados
AU  - A Vereczkey
AU  - S Saravelos
AU  - A Vitagliano
AU  - M Acién
AU  - L Gianaroli
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
DO  - 10.1093/humrep/deag143
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deag143
AB  - STUDY QUESTION: How should the findings of diagnostic hysteroscopy in women with reproductive disorders be reported?  SUMMARY ANSWER: This collaborative document by the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), the ESHRE, and the International Federation of Fertility Societies (IFFS) provides the first detailed structured reporting template for diagnostic hysteroscopy findings in women with reproductive disorders.  WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Despite its widespread use in women with reproductive disorders, no standardized framework currently exists for reporting of hysteroscopic findings. This lack of uniformity may limit the utility of the procedure and contribute to substantial heterogeneity among operators and centers. As a result, the reproducibility of hysteroscopy is limited, making it difficult to conduct robust studies that define its prognostic value in specific patient subgroups.  STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A dedicated working group from ESGE, ESHRE, and IFFS collaborated to develop a consensus for comprehensive structured reporting of diagnostic hysteroscopy findings in women with reproductive problems.  PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This consensus paper focuses on grouping diagnostic hysteroscopic findings, structuring their reporting, and adopting standardized terminology for women with reproductive disorders. The virtual Nominal Group Technique, a structured consensus-building method, was adopted to ensure equal contribution from all members in the development of the final consensus.  MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The document provides a structured reporting of hysteroscopic findings into five sections, each systematically capturing patient characteristics, procedural findings, and pathological observations as follows: patient’s characteristics, and findings from the vagina, cervix, uterine cavity, endometrium, and tubal ostia.  LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The inclusion of a finding in this structured report is not a proof of its clinical significance, but it could be used as a validation tool for further research.  WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The standardized reporting of hysteroscopic findings promotes consistent data collection across centers and could help inform research and exchange of clinical experience, enhancing the value of hysteroscopy in fertility evaluation.  FUNDING: No external funding was received for the development of the consensus process or manuscript preparation.  DISCLOSURES: All authors declare that they have no competing interests.  TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
SN  - 0268-1161
SN  - 1460-2350
ER  -