Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0HAL

Bell nonlocality does not imply violation of nonlocal games

Abstract

Nonlocal games offer a conceptually clear way to reason about Bell nonlocality. However, we show that as originally defined, and most commonly used, i.e. with a deterministic predicate, they cannot be complete witnesses of nonlocality. Concretely, we prove the existence of nonlocal behaviours which do not violate any such nonlocal game. Furthermore, we also show that quantum mechanics can produce these game-classical nonlocal behaviours. We prove that this phenomenon exists in every bipartite scenario $(X,Y,A,B)$ with X,Y≥2 and A,B≥4.

Related

  1. Does a pole in the self-energy imply a violation of the Luttinger theorem?
    Artem Abanov, Andrey Chubukov
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Revivals of Bell nonlocality require Schrödinger and Heisenberg non-Markovianity
    Federico Settimo, Kimmo Luoma, Jyrki Piilo +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Quantum entanglement and Bell nonlocality in top-quark pair production at a photon linear collider
    Seong Youl Choi, Dong Woo Kang, Jae Sik Lee +1
    Journal of High Energy PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsCrossref
  4. The minimal example of quantum network Bell nonlocality
    Erwan Don, Jessica Bavaresco, Patryk Lipka-Bartosik +3
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationHAL
  5. Dark-Mode Control of Contrasting Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality between Mechanical Oscillators
    Souvik Agasti, Philippe Djorwe, Xin Zhou
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{faleiro2026bell,
  title = {{Bell nonlocality does not imply violation of nonlocal games}},
  author = {Ricardo Faleiro and Lucas Emanuel Antunes Porto and Marco Túlio Quintino and Flavien Hirsch},
  howpublished = {HAL},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.06799},
  eprint = {2610.06799},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05787551v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Bell nonlocality does not imply violation of nonlocal games
AU  - Ricardo Faleiro
AU  - Lucas Emanuel Antunes Porto
AU  - Marco Túlio Quintino
AU  - Flavien Hirsch
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - HAL
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.06799
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05787551v1
AB  - Nonlocal games offer a conceptually clear way to reason about Bell nonlocality. However, we show that as originally defined, and most commonly used, i.e. with a deterministic predicate, they cannot be complete witnesses of nonlocality. Concretely, we prove the existence of nonlocal behaviours which do not violate any such nonlocal game. Furthermore, we also show that quantum mechanics can produce these game-classical nonlocal behaviours. We prove that this phenomenon exists in every bipartite scenario $(X,Y,A,B)$ with X,Y≥2 and A,B≥4.
ER  -