Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

The effect of re-warm up and its moderators on performance enhancement and rating of perceived exertion in team-sport athletes: A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis

  1. 1School of Physical Education, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
  2. 2Research Center for High-Quality Development of Competitive Sports, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei, China

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine the effects of re-warm up (RWU) on athletic performance and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in team-sport athletes and to identify potential moderators of these effects. Methods: A literature search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Springer, ProQuest, SPORTDiscus, and CNKI from database inception to 7 June 2025. Three-level meta-analytic models were fitted using R software. Moderation analyses were conducted using the omnibus test method and meta-regression. Results: A total of 20 studies were included. Compared with passive rest, RWU improved countermovement jump (CMJ) performance, sprint performance, and agility, but was also associated with higher RPE (g = 1.04). No statistically significant effects were observed for squat jump (SJ) performance, repeated-sprint ability, or maximal strength. Moderator analyses indicated that takeoff style and lower-limb dominance significantly moderated the effect of RWU on CMJ performance, with significant interactions involving takeoff style, lower-limb dominance, interval format, and age group. For sprint performance, interval format significantly moderated the effect of RWU, whereas no significant moderating effects were observed for age group, running distance, BMI, RWU duration, or warm-up exercise type. The effect of RWU on RPE was significantly moderated by age group and assessment timing, with interactions involving age group, assessment timing, and interval format. Conclusion: RWU may improve CMJ performance, sprint performance, and agility, but current evidence does not indicate significant benefits for SJ performance, repeated-sprint ability, or maximal strength. Moderator effects appeared to be outcome-specific and should be interpreted cautiously, particularly where subgroup evidence was limited. Coaches are therefore advised to tailor RWU strategies to athletes’ individual characteristics, task demands, and competition schedules, while also paying attention to the risk of fatigue accumulation, particularly in youth athletes.

Related

  1. A performance enhancement of the Payne-Hanek range reduction algorithm
    Tue Ly
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  2. Investigation of the impact of graphite microparticle geometry on thermal performance enhancement of phase change materials (PCMs) for thermal energy storage
    Mohamed Moussa El Idi, Atilla Atli, Ahmad Hajjar +2
    Journal of Energy StoragePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textDynamical systemsFluid dynamicsHAL
  3. Performance of machine learning–based prediction models for hypoglycemia in Chinese patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jinhua Yan, Yanping Song, Yangmei Du +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsEndocrinology & metabolismPLOS
  4. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D status and physical performance in football players: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jinfa Gu, Yu Zhang, Luhua Xiao
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Organic chemistryStatisticsPLOS
  5. Systematic review and network meta-analysis of performance of the Sapporo criteria, the Revised Sapporo criteria, and the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: A protocol
    Jie Wang, Yangqi Yin, Jiaqi Qu +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsCardiovascular medicinePLOS
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026effect,
  title = {{The effect of re-warm up and its moderators on performance enhancement and rating of perceived exertion in team-sport athletes: A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis}},
  author = {Jie Zhang and Honglin Tang and Xiangping Zheng and Changzhen Zuo and Yilun Xie and Yilin Fan},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358479},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358479},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The effect of re-warm up and its moderators on performance enhancement and rating of perceived exertion in team-sport athletes: A systematic review and three-level meta-analysis
AU  - Jie Zhang
AU  - Honglin Tang
AU  - Xiangping Zheng
AU  - Changzhen Zuo
AU  - Yilun Xie
AU  - Yilin Fan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/18
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358479
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358479
AB  - Objective: This study aimed to examine the effects of re-warm up (RWU) on athletic performance and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in team-sport athletes and to identify potential moderators of these effects. Methods: A literature search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Springer, ProQuest, SPORTDiscus, and CNKI from database inception to 7 June 2025. Three-level meta-analytic models were fitted using R software. Moderation analyses were conducted using the omnibus test method and meta-regression. Results: A total of 20 studies were included. Compared with passive rest, RWU improved countermovement jump (CMJ) performance, sprint performance, and agility, but was also associated with higher RPE (g = 1.04). No statistically significant effects were observed for squat jump (SJ) performance, repeated-sprint ability, or maximal strength. Moderator analyses indicated that takeoff style and lower-limb dominance significantly moderated the effect of RWU on CMJ performance, with significant interactions involving takeoff style, lower-limb dominance, interval format, and age group. For sprint performance, interval format significantly moderated the effect of RWU, whereas no significant moderating effects were observed for age group, running distance, BMI, RWU duration, or warm-up exercise type. The effect of RWU on RPE was significantly moderated by age group and assessment timing, with interactions involving age group, assessment timing, and interval format. Conclusion: RWU may improve CMJ performance, sprint performance, and agility, but current evidence does not indicate significant benefits for SJ performance, repeated-sprint ability, or maximal strength. Moderator effects appeared to be outcome-specific and should be interpreted cautiously, particularly where subgroup evidence was limited. Coaches are therefore advised to tailor RWU strategies to athletes’ individual characteristics, task demands, and competition schedules, while also paying attention to the risk of fatigue accumulation, particularly in youth athletes.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -