Mice and humans use ambiguous local motion to stabilize gaze
- 1IOB - Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel
Abstract
Animals need to infer properties of the environment that are only ambiguously encoded by neurons in the sensory periphery. In vision, local edge motion seen through small receptive fields does not uniquely specify the direction of global or object motion. Can these ambiguous local motion signals drive behavior directly, or must the ambiguity first be resolved? We addressed this question in reflexive gaze stabilization by tracing motion signals from the retina through the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) to eye movements, combining retinal and in vivo electrophysiology, computational modelling, and eye tracking in mice and humans. By using stimuli that dissociate local edge motion from global, object motion, we found that NOT cell responses were strongly biased towards local motion and were largely explained by linear pooling of retinal inputs. This effect propagated to behavior: eye movements followed local motion, to the point that changing the edge orientation of vertically moving objects produced horizontal eye movements. Humans showed a qualitatively similar bias, which increased when central vision was masked. Thus, ambiguous local motion signals can drive effective behavior; a conserved sensorimotor strategy in which visually guided behavior relies on a heuristic rather than an accurate reconstruction of the external world.
Related
- Spatially Confined Phase Separation Promotes Local Tubulin Availability to Stabilize Ciliary Microtubule Growth
- From mice to humans: A multi-omic predictive framework for translational immunology
- Fat-Specific Protein 27/CIDEC Promotes Development of Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in Mice and Humans
- Persistent decision-making in mice, monkeys and humans
- Open Dataset of Developmental Timelines for Corresponding Milestones in Mice, Rats, and Humans
BibTeX
@misc{rosselli2026mice,
title = {{Mice and humans use ambiguous local motion to stabilize gaze}},
author = {F. B. Rosselli and M. Buettner and A. Bucci and F. Franke},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.31.747047},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.31.747047v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Mice and humans use ambiguous local motion to stabilize gaze
AU - F. B. Rosselli
AU - M. Buettner
AU - A. Bucci
AU - F. Franke
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/31
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.08.31.747047
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.31.747047v1
AB - Animals need to infer properties of the environment that are only ambiguously encoded by neurons in the sensory periphery. In vision, local edge motion seen through small receptive fields does not uniquely specify the direction of global or object motion. Can these ambiguous local motion signals drive behavior directly, or must the ambiguity first be resolved? We addressed this question in reflexive gaze stabilization by tracing motion signals from the retina through the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) to eye movements, combining retinal and in vivo electrophysiology, computational modelling, and eye tracking in mice and humans. By using stimuli that dissociate local edge motion from global, object motion, we found that NOT cell responses were strongly biased towards local motion and were largely explained by linear pooling of retinal inputs. This effect propagated to behavior: eye movements followed local motion, to the point that changing the edge orientation of vertically moving objects produced horizontal eye movements. Humans showed a qualitatively similar bias, which increased when central vision was masked. Thus, ambiguous local motion signals can drive effective behavior; a conserved sensorimotor strategy in which visually guided behavior relies on a heuristic rather than an accurate reconstruction of the external world.
ER -