Modelling the influence of the duration of effectiveness and time taken to implement vector control interventions for vector-borne diseases.
- 1University of Glasgow
Abstract
Implementing vector control interventions against infectious diseases is operationally challenging, with delivery and population uptake taking considerable time within a community. Studies have suggested that the slow mass drug administration (MDA) of the endectocide, ivermectin, may have contributed to the lower epidemiological impact against malaria observed in recent cluster-randomised controlled trials, although evidence supporting this hypothesis is lacking. It is unclear whether interventions which have short but highly effective durations of entomological impact are more impactful than tools which kill the same number of mosquitoes but over a longer period. Transmission dynamics mathematical models can be used to explore the trade-offs between product profiles and investigate how different implementation periods could influence disease control. First, we use a simple vector-borne disease compartmental model to explore the epidemiological impact of killing the same number of mosquitoes over 10, 30 or 90 days. We find that for different mosquito-killing periods, the total number of cases averted is similar, although the observable impact may depend on when efficacy is assessed. Secondly, we adapted an existing malaria transmission model and simulated the fast and slow deployment of an effective endectocide MDA campaign in different seasonal settings. In perennial and seasonal settings and for a given coverage, slow MDA deployment averts more clinical cases of malaria than a fast synchronised distribution (completed in a single day, although the difference was modest). The benefits of the intervention depend on how well-timed a deployment is relative to the peak of the transmission season, with the efficacy of an ivermectin-like endectocide MDA being up to approximately 42% lower if started late. The work indicates that the time taken to complete MDA campaigns is unlikely to drive major differences in the effectiveness of short-lived endectocides and showcases how transmission dynamics models can be used to support epidemiological trial interpretation.
Author summaryMathematical models can be used to help guide the development and implementation of control interventions against infectious diseases and explore how real-world complexities can impact disease control. Previous modelling work indicated that the mass drug administration (MDA) of the mosquito-killing drug, ivermectin, could substantially reduce malaria transmission, assuming eligible individuals due to receive the drug do so on the same day. Logistical constraints mean that MDA campaigns are often slower to implement, although the epidemiological impact of this is unclear. We develop a mathematical modelling framework to explore how the speed at which an intervention is deployed, or its period of effectiveness, influences vector-borne disease dynamics. Results suggest that spreading the impact of an intervention over a longer period provides slightly greater protection. Slower MDA deployment of an ivermectin-like drug is generally more efficacious, although impact is diminished in areas with seasonal mosquito abundance if it is implemented too late in the transmission season.
Related
- Gaming duration and psychological well-being among university students: implications for public health prevention using a cross-sectional study with a modelling approach
- Surgical Site Infection: Conditional Influence of Surgery Duration and ASA Classification in Major Procedures.
- Estimating the cost-effectiveness of the National Weight Management Enhanced Service and NHS Digital Weight Management Programme in England: a modelling study
- Modelling pharyngolaryngeal effectiveness using multimodal non-invasive sensors: study protocol for the PhLEs clinical trial
- Effectiveness of Nursing Interventions on Stress and Functional Capacity Among Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG): A Randomized Controlled Trial
BibTeX
@misc{chandradeva2026modelling,
title = {{Modelling the influence of the duration of effectiveness and time taken to implement vector control interventions for vector-borne diseases.}},
author = {N. Chandradeva and A. C. Glover and C. Whittaker and T. Brewer and J. D. Challenger and H. C. Slater and E. Sherrard-Smith and T. S. Churcher},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.30.26364329},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.30.26364329v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Modelling the influence of the duration of effectiveness and time taken to implement vector control interventions for vector-borne diseases.
AU - N. Chandradeva
AU - A. C. Glover
AU - C. Whittaker
AU - T. Brewer
AU - J. D. Challenger
AU - H. C. Slater
AU - E. Sherrard-Smith
AU - T. S. Churcher
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.30.26364329
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.30.26364329v1
AB - Implementing vector control interventions against infectious diseases is operationally challenging, with delivery and population uptake taking considerable time within a community. Studies have suggested that the slow mass drug administration (MDA) of the endectocide, ivermectin, may have contributed to the lower epidemiological impact against malaria observed in recent cluster-randomised controlled trials, although evidence supporting this hypothesis is lacking. It is unclear whether interventions which have short but highly effective durations of entomological impact are more impactful than tools which kill the same number of mosquitoes but over a longer period. Transmission dynamics mathematical models can be used to explore the trade-offs between product profiles and investigate how different implementation periods could influence disease control. First, we use a simple vector-borne disease compartmental model to explore the epidemiological impact of killing the same number of mosquitoes over 10, 30 or 90 days. We find that for different mosquito-killing periods, the total number of cases averted is similar, although the observable impact may depend on when efficacy is assessed. Secondly, we adapted an existing malaria transmission model and simulated the fast and slow deployment of an effective endectocide MDA campaign in different seasonal settings. In perennial and seasonal settings and for a given coverage, slow MDA deployment averts more clinical cases of malaria than a fast synchronised distribution (completed in a single day, although the difference was modest). The benefits of the intervention depend on how well-timed a deployment is relative to the peak of the transmission season, with the efficacy of an ivermectin-like endectocide MDA being up to approximately 42% lower if started late. The work indicates that the time taken to complete MDA campaigns is unlikely to drive major differences in the effectiveness of short-lived endectocides and showcases how transmission dynamics models can be used to support epidemiological trial interpretation. Author summaryMathematical models can be used to help guide the development and implementation of control interventions against infectious diseases and explore how real-world complexities can impact disease control. Previous modelling work indicated that the mass drug administration (MDA) of the mosquito-killing drug, ivermectin, could substantially reduce malaria transmission, assuming eligible individuals due to receive the drug do so on the same day. Logistical constraints mean that MDA campaigns are often slower to implement, although the epidemiological impact of this is unclear. We develop a mathematical modelling framework to explore how the speed at which an intervention is deployed, or its period of effectiveness, influences vector-borne disease dynamics. Results suggest that spreading the impact of an intervention over a longer period provides slightly greater protection. Slower MDA deployment of an ivermectin-like drug is generally more efficacious, although impact is diminished in areas with seasonal mosquito abundance if it is implemented too late in the transmission season.
ER -