Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,686 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAJournal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences

Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of two different in-office vital bleaching agents in treating dental fluorosis - Randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Introduction: Bleaching teeth is becoming a more popular dental procedure due to possibility of promoting faster tooth whitening with highly concentrated chemicals in-office method has become more popular than home use. Aim: To compare and evaluate the effectiveness of two different in-office vital bleaching agents in treating dental fluorosis. Methodology: 40 subjects were randomly divided into two groups, according to the bleaching agent used: 35% Hydrogen Peroxide and 35% Carbamide Peroxide. The evaluation was completed by two blinded, calibrated evaluators who compared the baseline color of the maxillary anterior teeth with a value-oriented shade guide after each period. The patients recorded the tooth sensitivity on a 0 – 4 scale before and immediately, 3 days, 7 days, and 15 days after the bleaching procedure. Data on sensitivity level were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and data from the color evaluation were subjected to Wilcoxon signed-rank and Friedman tests. Results: The degree of teeth sensitivity was nearly eliminated with the use of CP, while the difference between the bleaching agents disappeared after 24 hours. There was no significant difference between both bleaching agents in tooth whitening. CP provided less sensitivity when compared to HP, but there were no differences in comfort of the techniques used. Conclusion: Both bleaching agents resulted in high levels of patient satisfaction. CP resulted in reduced tooth sensitivity when compared to HP.

Related

  1. Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes of three different scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment – A randomized clinical trial
    Mousumi Goswami, Aditya Saxena, Prachi Pathak +1
    Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive DentistryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Three Different Mouthwashes on Salivary pH in Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Sruthi Jeevagan, Sathi Rami Reddy Mora, Mohamed Rahmankhan N +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Comparative effectiveness of exercise and self-management interventions delivered through different modes of digital support on pain and patient-reported physical function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Hao Luo, Guoqing Zhang, Lingyun Long +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Comparative effectiveness of novel laser-assisted technologies for treating peri-implantitis : A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhe Wang, Jing Wen, Haoyang Li +2
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Comparative Evaluation of Concurrent Carboplatin-Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin-Etoposide Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Yamini Kumar, Bala Venkat Subramanian, G V Deepthi +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{mada2026comparative,
  title = {{Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of two different in-office vital bleaching agents in treating dental fluorosis - Randomized clinical trial}},
  author = {Udaya Rekha Mada and Srinivasulu Gomasani and R.V.S. Krishna Kumar and Punamalli S. Prasanth},
  journal = {Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_61_24},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_61_24},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of two different in-office vital bleaching agents in treating dental fluorosis - Randomized clinical trial
AU  - Udaya Rekha Mada
AU  - Srinivasulu Gomasani
AU  - R.V.S. Krishna Kumar
AU  - Punamalli S. Prasanth
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences
DO  - 10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_61_24
UR  - https://doi.org/10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_61_24
AB  - Introduction: Bleaching teeth is becoming a more popular dental procedure due to possibility of promoting faster tooth whitening with highly concentrated chemicals in-office method has become more popular than home use. Aim: To compare and evaluate the effectiveness of two different in-office vital bleaching agents in treating dental fluorosis. Methodology: 40 subjects were randomly divided into two groups, according to the bleaching agent used: 35% Hydrogen Peroxide and 35% Carbamide Peroxide. The evaluation was completed by two blinded, calibrated evaluators who compared the baseline color of the maxillary anterior teeth with a value-oriented shade guide after each period. The patients recorded the tooth sensitivity on a 0 – 4 scale before and immediately, 3 days, 7 days, and 15 days after the bleaching procedure. Data on sensitivity level were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and data from the color evaluation were subjected to Wilcoxon signed-rank and Friedman tests. Results: The degree of teeth sensitivity was nearly eliminated with the use of CP, while the difference between the bleaching agents disappeared after 24 hours. There was no significant difference between both bleaching agents in tooth whitening. CP provided less sensitivity when compared to HP, but there were no differences in comfort of the techniques used. Conclusion: Both bleaching agents resulted in high levels of patient satisfaction. CP resulted in reduced tooth sensitivity when compared to HP.
SN  - 2278-1889
SN  - 2277-8632
ER  -