Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

BELL: Biomodel Evidence and LLM-based Logic

  1. 1University of Pittsburgh

Abstract

Building accurate and predictive mechanistic models requires careful biological interaction curation and verification against existing knowledge. When done manually, these tasks become impractical, especially with massive extraction of interactions facilitated by advanced natural language processing methods and large language models (LLMs). We present BELL (Biomodel Evidence and LLM-based Logic), a biocuration support framework that automates evidence retrieval, scoring, and explanation for interaction-level verification. BELL processes each interaction through a five-step pipeline: entity grounding, database ranking, evidence retrieval from seven biological databases, a heuristic four-dimension programmatic scoring, and chain-of-thought explanation with a recommended curator action generated by LLMs. We applied BELL on 210 protein-protein interactions from a curated Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) model. Results show that 49.5% of interactions achieved HIGH confidence and 72.4% received a positive curator recommendation, while qualitative flags precisely directed curator attention to evidence gaps. BELL is integrated into the KALIMBA curation platform and available at www.boheme.pitt.edu/Kalimba.

Related

  1. NeuroGraphBench: Interacting with Drosophila Connectomes at Scale for Exploring the Functional Logic of Neural Circuits
    A. A. Lazar, S. Shukla, Y. Zhou
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull text1 citedNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. An embedded deep learning–fuzzy logic framework for intelligent and automated irrigation in smart farming
    Ze Luo, Zhuo Yang, Yi Hu +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossref
  3. Boolean Logic-responsive FRET Biosensors via Genetically Encoded Autonomous Compilation
    H. Son, J. W. Hoye, M. Khawand +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  4. Mechanistic Interpretability Needs a Logic of Inference
    Zhimin Hu, Chen Jiang, Hanbo Xie +2
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceOSF
  5. A proof-carrying architecture for synthetic genetic logic circuits under stochastic temporal contracts
    Arman Ferdowsi, Laura Kovacs
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{arazkhani2026bell,
  title = {{BELL: Biomodel Evidence and LLM-based Logic}},
  author = {N. Arazkhani and B. H. Cochran and N. Miskov-Zivanov},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.18.721350},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.18.721350v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - BELL: Biomodel Evidence and LLM-based Logic
AU  - N. Arazkhani
AU  - B. H. Cochran
AU  - N. Miskov-Zivanov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/18
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.18.721350
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.18.721350v1
AB  - Building accurate and predictive mechanistic models requires careful biological interaction curation and verification against existing knowledge. When done manually, these tasks become impractical, especially with massive extraction of interactions facilitated by advanced natural language processing methods and large language models (LLMs). We present BELL (Biomodel Evidence and LLM-based Logic), a biocuration support framework that automates evidence retrieval, scoring, and explanation for interaction-level verification. BELL processes each interaction through a five-step pipeline: entity grounding, database ranking, evidence retrieval from seven biological databases, a heuristic four-dimension programmatic scoring, and chain-of-thought explanation with a recommended curator action generated by LLMs. We applied BELL on 210 protein-protein interactions from a curated Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) model. Results show that 49.5% of interactions achieved HIGH confidence and 72.4% received a positive curator recommendation, while qualitative flags precisely directed curator attention to evidence gaps. BELL is integrated into the KALIMBA curation platform and available at www.boheme.pitt.edu/Kalimba.
ER  -