Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Meaningful yet complex: navigating cross-sectoral collaboration in arts-based health promotion

Abstract

Background: WHO highlights the promising role of arts and culture in health promotion and prevention. A cross-sector partnership in Central Denmark Region developed a group-based singing intervention to support women at increased risk of postpartum depression. Running the intervention requires ongoing collaboration between regional hospitals (recruitment) and municipal music and arts schools (delivery). This study examines what motivates such cross-sectoral collaboration and how it is experienced by the professionals involved in this intervention.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 14 stakeholders, including regional decision-makers, midwives from regional hospitals, and singing teachers, leaders and project coordinators from municipal music and arts schools. Data were collected in 2025 and 2026 and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Preliminary analysis identifies two main themes: (1) Shared motivation and situated interests. Strong motivation and high perceived value were prominent across actors. These operated at two levels: (a) a shared cross-sectoral ambition to support women, and (b) individual motivations shaped by professional roles, responsibilities, and local contexts. (2) Recurring tensions in collaboration. Differences in professionals’ roles, priorities, and organisational contexts caused repeated and unresolved tensions due to uncertainty about who the intervention is for, how it should be delivered across sectors, and who benefits from it.

Conclusions: Across professions and sectors, professionals were highly motivated by the arts-based intervention, but this study highlights the challenges of bringing together actors from fundamentally different organisational contexts and ways of working. Shared responsibility, sustained organisational, managerial, and financial support are needed to integrate such interventions into routine practice, alongside further research on how this can be achieved.

Key messages: • Cross-sectoral arts-based interventions are widely valued and generate strong motivation. But tensions emerge in practice due to differences in organisational contexts and ways of working.

• Cross-sectoral collaboration depends on alignment between actors and requires shared responsibility and organisational, managerial and financial support for integration into routine practice.

Related

  1. Cocaine use in Europe: the need for cross-sectoral collaboration between security, justice, health, and social systems
    Marie Lhosmot-Marquet, Clotilde Champeyrache, Hélène Donnadieu +6
    The Lancet Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY1 citedEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  2. Ambitious but unclear: a policy document analysis of digital cross-sectoral collaboration between social security service and healthcare service in Norway.
    Maryam Haghshenas, Aslak Steinsbekk, Karen Walseth Hara
    BMC health services researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  3. Editorial: Navigating child injury prevention and safety promotion: strategies, evidence, and sustainable transformations
    Ye Jin, Li Li, Julie Brown +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefDOAJ
  4. Beyond rehabilitation: toward developmental and trans-sectoral systems of support for complex acquired brain injury in children
    Christiaan Gmelig Meyling, Sandra Bakker, Marike Reinders +7
    Frontiers in rehabilitation sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  5. Learning the how of collaboration: action research on neighbourhood-level health promotion
    J Sonneveld, J Bruijning
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{fyrstenborg2026meaningful,
  title = {{Meaningful yet complex: navigating cross-sectoral collaboration in arts-based health promotion}},
  author = {A Fyrstenborg and S Lou and A Bo},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1462},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1462},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Meaningful yet complex: navigating cross-sectoral collaboration in arts-based health promotion
AU  - A Fyrstenborg
AU  - S Lou
AU  - A Bo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1462
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1462
AB  - Background: WHO highlights the promising role of arts and culture in health promotion and prevention. A cross-sector partnership in Central Denmark Region developed a group-based singing intervention to support women at increased risk of postpartum depression. Running the intervention requires ongoing collaboration between regional hospitals (recruitment) and municipal music and arts schools (delivery). This study examines what motivates such cross-sectoral collaboration and how it is experienced by the professionals involved in this intervention.  Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 14 stakeholders, including regional decision-makers, midwives from regional hospitals, and singing teachers, leaders and project coordinators from municipal music and arts schools. Data were collected in 2025 and 2026 and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.  Results: Preliminary analysis identifies two main themes: (1) Shared motivation and situated interests. Strong motivation and high perceived value were prominent across actors. These operated at two levels: (a) a shared cross-sectoral ambition to support women, and (b) individual motivations shaped by professional roles, responsibilities, and local contexts. (2) Recurring tensions in collaboration. Differences in professionals’ roles, priorities, and organisational contexts caused repeated and unresolved tensions due to uncertainty about who the intervention is for, how it should be delivered across sectors, and who benefits from it.  Conclusions: Across professions and sectors, professionals were highly motivated by the arts-based intervention, but this study highlights the challenges of bringing together actors from fundamentally different organisational contexts and ways of working. Shared responsibility, sustained organisational, managerial, and financial support are needed to integrate such interventions into routine practice, alongside further research on how this can be achieved.  Key messages: • Cross-sectoral arts-based interventions are widely valued and generate strong motivation. But tensions emerge in practice due to differences in organisational contexts and ways of working.  • Cross-sectoral collaboration depends on alignment between actors and requires shared responsibility and organisational, managerial and financial support for integration into routine practice.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -