Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
178,033 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Learning joint probabilistic weather forecasts from station observations alone

Abstract

Assessing compound weather risks requires forecasts representing dependence between variables. CLARA (Calibrated Advection-Routing Attention) learns joint Gaussian predictive distributions of five surface variables from station observations alone, without numerical weather prediction or reanalysis; the approximately 28,000-parameter model supports CPU training and prediction. Across six multi-year folds on 96 stations, its lead-mean energy score is 4.9% lower than that of a learned comparator with matched temporal inputs (4.7% with a similar parameter count) and 11-65% lower than those of statistical baselines. Holding marginal variances fixed, removing learned correlations worsens joint negative log-likelihood by 1.0-2.8 nats per station. A covariance-scale estimator, proved consistent under stated assumptions, improves short-lead calibration but over-corrects at long leads. Synthetic interventions show an attention-bias coefficient alone does not measure forecast influence. Retrained in ten regions on six continents, CLARA outperforms persistence in all 60 multi-year region-lead comparisons and a similarly sized learned model in 57 of 60.

Related

  1. Improving global precipitation forecasts with an AI weather model trained on satellite observations
    Julian F. Schmitt, Bertrand Delorme, Robert C. King +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
  2. A Station-Based Evaluation of Machine Learning-based Weather Forecasting Models in Northern Norway
    Siyan Chen, Lars Uebbing, Eirik Mikal Samuelsen +5
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
  3. Butterfly Effect and the Kinetic Energy Cascade in Probabilistic Machine Learning Weather Prediction Models
    Jiakai Chen, Joel Oskarsson, Simon Driscoll +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
  4. Station-trained air-quality forecasts without regional emission inventories
    TK Lee
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY-NC 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyEnvironmental science & pollutionEarthArXiv
  5. Can we create a `race to the top' for weather forecasts to inform smallholder farmer decisions?
    Colin Aitken, Michael K. Tippett, Pedram Hassanzadeh +9
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{yi2026learning,
  title = {{Learning joint probabilistic weather forecasts from station observations alone}},
  author = {Chaeyeon Yi and Yun Am Seo},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.09898},
  eprint = {2610.09898},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09898},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Learning joint probabilistic weather forecasts from station observations alone
AU  - Chaeyeon Yi
AU  - Yun Am Seo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.09898
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09898
AB  - Assessing compound weather risks requires forecasts representing dependence between variables. CLARA (Calibrated Advection-Routing Attention) learns joint Gaussian predictive distributions of five surface variables from station observations alone, without numerical weather prediction or reanalysis; the approximately 28,000-parameter model supports CPU training and prediction. Across six multi-year folds on 96 stations, its lead-mean energy score is 4.9% lower than that of a learned comparator with matched temporal inputs (4.7% with a similar parameter count) and 11-65% lower than those of statistical baselines. Holding marginal variances fixed, removing learned correlations worsens joint negative log-likelihood by 1.0-2.8 nats per station. A covariance-scale estimator, proved consistent under stated assumptions, improves short-lead calibration but over-corrects at long leads. Synthetic interventions show an attention-bias coefficient alone does not measure forecast influence. Retrained in ten regions on six continents, CLARA outperforms persistence in all 60 multi-year region-lead comparisons and a similarly sized learned model in 57 of 60.
ER  -